Almost as quickly, some longtime critics of the Clintons and global
warming science noticed that Mr. Tapper's post included the full text of the climate portion of Mr. Clinton's speech, which clearly showed the offending line had been taken out of context.
Not exact matches
When he lined up their ages with global climate records, he
noticed a pattern: Many species of megafauna seemed to disappear during a period of extreme
warming around 12,300 years ago, Cooper and his team write today in
Science Advances.
I
noticed an interesting sounding review entitled «The Global
warming Debate: A Review of the State of the
Science» in PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS 162, 1557 - 1586 (2005).
He was working on the history of atmospheric
sciences, I was working on the history of oceanography, and we had both
noticed that some of the people who were challenging the scientific evidence of global
warming had previously questioned the evidence of stratospheric ozone depletion and the harms of tobacco.
According to the «consensus on consensus» paper, for instance, I
noticed that 88 % of members of the AMS surveyed whose area of expertise was climate
science, agreed in 2014 that half or more of the
warming was caused by human activities, including 78 % who agreed that «the cause of global
warming over the past 150 years was mostly human».
While many in the media portrayed the phenomenon as a desperate weapon used by sceptics to undermine climate
science, real scientists took
notice and began to study the
warming pause.
So true... Fear of global
warming has been great for academia and the Left from the beginning because it, «makes industry and capitalism look bad while affording endless visuals of animals and third - world humans suffering at the hands of wealthy Westerners,» as Van Dyke
noticed, plus: «Best of all, being driven by junk -
science that easily metamorphoses as required, it appeared to be endlessly self - sustaining.»
Examples of
science fiction based on devastating climate change are Ready (1998), well - meaning but scarcely
noticed; Turner (1989), a story of civilization collapsing under the pressures of war and economic forces as well as global
warming (noted fairly widely for its literary quality); and, by two of the field's major authors, Silverberg (1994)(little noted), emphasizing the greed, stupidity and ambitions that were bringing vast destruction through ozone as well as global
warming, and Sterling (1995), where colossal storms mingle with stormy political conspiracy.
Amid the aftermath of the failed Times Square terrorist attack and the lethal floods in Tennessee — not to mention the president finally
noticing there is a deep water drilling disaster in the Gulf of Mexico — the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global
Warming held a hearing for Democrats to attempt to gloss over fatal flaws exposed in global warming «consensus science» by the Climategate s
Warming held a hearing for Democrats to attempt to gloss over fatal flaws exposed in global
warming «consensus science» by the Climategate s
warming «consensus
science» by the Climategate scandal.
I
noticed that there is an editorial in the Post today generally rebutting the idea that the consensus on
warming is meaningless and not supported by good
science.
If the author is already peddling denialism based on limited facts used out of context, and this new paper is published likely just to be used as the latest red herring distraction in the global
warming argument by examining «Svalbard and Greenland temperature records» in a too limited time span without relevant context, which, just in case some may not have
noticed does not represent the region known as planet Earth, uses too short a time span in relation to mechanism outside of the examined region because it is in fact a regional analysis; one is left with a reasonable conclusion that the paper is designed to be precisely what I suspect it is designed for, to be a red herring distraction in the argument between
science and
science denialism regarding global
warming.