Not exact matches
Research led by the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA (ACAD) at the University of Adelaide, published in
Science Advances, has
revealed that it was only when the climate
warmed, long after humans first arrived in Patagonia, did the megafauna suddenly die off around 12,300 years ago.
With its powerful suite of complementary
science instruments, the mission soon
revealed a towering plume of water ice and vapor, salts and organic materials that issues from relatively
warm fractures on the wrinkled surface.
A
revealing look at RC's «real
science:» When SecularAnimist posts a dubious claim (# 87) about the cause and effects of global
warming, it remains here.
This might be an opportune time to remind everyone of how organized tobacco's astroturf «sound
science» movement morphed into attacks on
science in other areas like global
warming, as ably
revealed by George Monbiot, among others: http://opinion-nation.blogspot.com/2008/06/sound-
science-and-climate-change-or.html
I would suggest that the judge's need to ask some of the questions posed might to his credit
reveal a willingness to learn, but I think also
reveals a considerable misunderstanding of global
warming science, and even a rather primitive thinking, that for instance human breathing might be an issue.
One way or another, expect a lot more stories like Mr. Yiryel's in Africa, where demographers expect an additional one billion people by midcentury and
science has
revealed patterns of withering drought, with or without global
warming.
3:26 p.m. Updated Here's a look at new
science revealing the deep internal biases shaping how people regard research on global
warming, and a riff on how that's reflected among winners of the physics Nobel Prize.
The theory of manmade global
warming has been on the decline since the 2009 Climategate scandal
revealed that the «
science» behind the theory was far from objective.
Just to add the appropriate emphasis to what the past 164 years of empirical
science tell us, the «C3» estimator replica above also
reveals what would happen to «global
warming» if the entire U.S. economy shuts down for one year, eliminating some 5.8 billion tonnes of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion - again, it's a nothing - significant outcome for the climate.
FAR
revealed, for example, that on the most important indicator of uncertainty in climate
science — the likely range of
warming for a given increase in carbon dioxide emissions — progress was actually retrograde.
«Our research
revealed warming of the planet can be clearly detected since 1873 and that our oceans continue to absorb the great majority of this heat,» said researcher and lead author Will Hobbs of the University of Tasmania's Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies and the Australian Research Council's Centre of Excellence for Climate System
Science.
The last 18 years of 12 - month periods ending in October
reveals the unsettled, anti-consensus and indisputable
science of empirical evidence that Americans do not face catastrophic global
warming from human CO2.
As I mentioned yesterday, the Swedish scientist Lennart Bengtsson, former director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, winner of the 2005 Descartes Research Prize and the 2006 World Meteorological Organization IMO Prize and a man whose contributions to
science far outweigh Michael Mann's, recently
revealed that he was joining the advisory board of the Global
Warming Policy Foundation, a think - tank for rational skepticism founded in London by Nigel Lawson.
London, 19th April 2013 — Today new research by Carbon Tracker Initiative and the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at London School of Economics and Political
Science reveals that despite fossil fuel reserves already far exceeding the carbon budget to avoid global
warming of more than 2 °C, $ 674 billion was spent last year finding and developing new potentially stranded assets.
«So it is important to remind everyone of the very reason why tens of thousands of people are meeting in Bonn: unprecedented risk to humanity due to global
warming, as
revealed by
science.
The «Heartland Institute 2012 Proposed Budget»
revealed potentially illegal plans to pay federal employees to write unscientific global
warming material for K - 12 school programs and for anti-climate
science reports.
If you really want to understand what the CACC propaganda is really all about (and it certainly isn't
science) read the first article at «News: Global
Warming Controversy» (http://www.global-
warming.biz/news/Global-
warming-controversy.html)-- «EXCITING NEW CARBON CREDIT SECRETS
REVEALED How the Top People in Carbon Credits Are Quietly Making $ 100,000 to $ 50 Million Each Year (And How You Can Do The Same — Or Maybe Even Better)» (http://www.carbonventures.net/?hop=stevelast).
Leaked documents from Heartland Institute, an organization known for attacking climate
science,
revealed a plot to undermine the teaching of global
warming in public schools, the latest indication that climate change is becoming a part of the nation's culture wars.
Pubic debate quickly
reveals that the
science is highly debatable, so the
warmers tend to lose.
Flashback 1977: West Antarctic Ice Sheet Melt To Raise Sea Level 20 Ft. — National
Science Foundation
reveals: «It has nothing to do with a
warmer climate, just the dynamics of unstable ice»
The dangers of attributing sea level rise and Hurricane Sandy to global
warming to one side, it is these claims much more than his «
science advocacy» which
reveal Gavin's values.
On the one hand, this year we have Stephen Schneider telling us that «Risks of global
warming have been underestimated», James Hansen warning us that «Only in the past few years did the
science crystallise,
revealing the urgency.
An earlier publication, also in
Science,
revealed that biodiversity decline accelerates with climate
warming — and that some continents (South America, Australia) seem to be more vulnerable than others.
Michael Mann, a leading climate scientist and professor of meteorology at Pennsylvania State University whose hacked personal emails have recently become the source of media attention was joined by NASA climate scientist Dr. Gavin Schmidt, Princeton's Dr. Michael Oppenheimer, and CAP Senior Fellow Dr. Joseph Romm to discuss the overwhelming scientific understanding of the danger posed by unmitigated global
warming pollution, and that the stolen emails
reveal nothing that changes our extensive understanding of climate
science.
Then the Los Angeles Times
revealed that even as the Exxon board was publicly dismissing climate
science as «very unclear,» company researchers were examining whether global
warming would facilitate oil exploration in the Arctic Ocean...