I feel bad that Mr. Revkin couldn't get the administration to bite on what even some global
warming scientists admit is an irrelevant, and most feel unquantifiable, «dangerous» level of global warming.
Not exact matches
Scientist Who Spearheaded Attacks on Global
Warming Science Also Directed $ 45 Million Tobacco Industry Effort to Hide Health Impacts of Smoking Former National Academy of Sciences President
Admits Being Paid $ 585,000 by Tobacco Companies.
Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent
scientists central to the global
warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these
scientists view global
warming as a political «cause» rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these
scientists frankly
admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.
When he and others were caught red - handed the IPCC
scientist at the center of the Warmergate scandal, Dr. Phil Jones,
admitted not only that the world may have been much
warmer in the past, but there has actually been no global
warming for 15 years.
By Jonathan Leake
SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have
admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global
warming are based.
Even the IPCC folks
admit (privately) problems with their global -
warming - due - to - anthropengic - increases - in - CO2 trope, with Kevin Trenberth agonizing over the fact that the «world's top
scientists» are not able to account for the lack of
warming.
Many climate
scientists are much less sure about man - made global
warming than they will
admit in public, he says.
But some of the climate
scientists gathered in Geneva to discuss how this might be done
admitted that, on such timescales, natural variability is at least as important as the long - term climate changes from global
warming.
This has been most commonly interpreted (among skeptics) as climate
scientists secretly
admitting amongst themselves that global
warming really has stopped.
«We don't fully understand how to input things like changes in the oceans, and because we don't fully understand it you could say that natural variability is now working to suppress the
warming,» Jones
admitted to the paper, apparently acknowledging what skeptical climate
scientists have been attempting to convey for years.
Jones answered honestly, if a bit clumsily, that the data period since 1995 is marginally too short to derive a statistically significant trend, a response which was headlined by the Daily Mail as «Climategate U-turn as
scientist at centre of row
admits: There has been no global
warming since 1995?»
https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-climate-models-have-not-exaggerated-global-
warming https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-why-the-one-point-five-
warming-limit-is-not-yet-a-geophysical-impossibility Youtube, potholer54's video «Did
scientists REALLY just
admit to exaggerating global
warming?»
While this is categorically false (the last decade was the
warmest on record and 2005 and 2010 are generally considered tied for the
warmest year),
scientists do
admit that
warming hasn't occurred over land as rapidly as predicted in the last ten years, especially given continually rising greenhouse gas emissions.
There are multiple
scientists, researchers, professors, as well as weather and climate change experts that have come out within the past couple of years and have openly
admitted our current understanding of climate change and global
warming to be false.
You can actually read ranking climate
scientists admitting to each other that global
warming has paused, and then scheming to figure out a way to conceal the pause, which was in itself a tacit admission that the theory to which they had devoted their careers had been falsified.
Yet, as Festinger would have predicted, instead of falling silent, perhaps even
admitting error, the denialists have become more vehement in their attacks on climate
scientists, environmentalists and anyone who accepts the evidence for global
warming.
Climategate U-turn as
scientist at centre of row
admits: There has been no global
warming since 1995 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-
scientist-centre-global-
warming-email-row-
admits-data-organised.html Jonathan Petre 14th February 2010
Update 2016: NASA's Lead «Global
Warming» scientist goes political: Calls for a carbon tax — NASA's «global warming» scientist in charge of keeping temperature records admits his bias: «We have to have a price on carbon because right now it's still free to put carbon dioxide into the atmo
Warming»
scientist goes political: Calls for a carbon tax — NASA's «global
warming» scientist in charge of keeping temperature records admits his bias: «We have to have a price on carbon because right now it's still free to put carbon dioxide into the atmo
warming»
scientist in charge of keeping temperature records
admits his bias: «We have to have a price on carbon because right now it's still free to put carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
I've already detailed the way Desmog's founder James Hoggan essentially torpedoes his site's entire existence with the way he first
admits he knows nothing about climate science, but is certain that skeptic climate
scientists are liars, the latter of which he derives entirely from Ross Gelbspan, the «Pulitzer - winning investigator» who Al Gore says discovered the supposedly leaked Western Fuels Association «Information Council for the Environment» (ICE) PR campaign's sinister strategy to «reposition global
warming as theory rather than fact.»
The UK Times Online reports an explosive admission coming forth from the CRU in the aftermath of the ClimateGate revelations (via Memeorandum):
SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have
admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global
warming are based.
«Global
warming is just HALF what we said: World's top climate
scientists admit computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong»
To that end, they are ramping up the dire climate forecasts, even as more and more
scientists jump off of the global -
warming bandwagon and leading alarmists
admit there is no evidence of global
warming over the past 17 years.
Unless a
warming trend re-establishes itself in some major way in the near future, you and every other climate
scientist being paid to study this stuff will have painted yourselves into a corner and forced to
admit that there is a serious flaw in AGW theory.
Honorable
scientists with respect for the principles of the scientific method
admit that even on a human scale the Earth has not
warmed to any significant degree at over the last seventeen years going on two decades, during which time CO2 increased.
Climategate U-turn as
scientist at centre of row
admits: There has been no global
warming since 1995 Jonathan Petre, The Daily Mail, 14 February 2010
Yesterday, the Daily Mail of the UK published a predictably inaccurate article entitled «Climategate U-turn as
scientist at centre of row
admits: There has been no global
warming since 1995».
This was headlined by the Daily Mail as «Climategate U-turn as
scientist at centre of row
admits: There has been no global
warming since 1995?.