Sentences with phrase «warming scientists do»

Not exact matches

Unfortunately, there are examples of at least one study, which claims 97 percent of climate scientists agree global warming is happening and is manmade, which may have done a not - so - great job of reaching such a conclusion.

if anyone disagrees with any scientist who supports global warming, you hypocritcal bozo's are the first to say, «hey, he's a scientist and your not, why don't you shut your face.»

Most of us do not trust the scientists employed by the cigarette companies to tell us truthfully about the consequences of smoking for health, nor the scientists who work for oil companies to give us accurate information about global warming.

But you see, the Met office never predicted a «barbecue summer», firstly because as scientists, the term «barbecue summer» is hardly scientific, but also because they predicted something along the lines of «there's a 60 % chance the summer will be warmer than average», which the media duly turned into «THEREZ GON NA B A BARBEE SUMA LOLZORZ!!!! 111» As someone on the internet said about Simon Jenkins recently, and could now so easily say about Hannan, he doesn't understand what a stochastic process is.

I work with scientists, so I know the only chance we have is to keep greenhouse gases in the ground until they can be fully captured so they don't warm the atmosphere or oceans any more.

«We're glad the governor went to global warming school, but he didn't learn the lessons from it,» said David Pringle, campaign director of the New Jersey Environmental Federation, about the governor's recent meetings with climate scientists.

Scientists from Rice University and Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi's Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies have discovered that Earth's sea level did not rise steadily but rather in sharp, punctuated bursts when the planet's glaciers melted during the period of global warming at the close of the last ice age.

As a result, 10 prominent scientists have written a letter to President Bush and other government leaders urging them to «shape policies to assure that government incentives for biofuels do not increase global warming.»

But for planetary scientists, Jupiter's most distinctive mystery may be what's called the «energy crisis» of its upper atmosphere: how do temperatures average about as warm as Earth's even though the enormous planet is more than fives times further away from the sun?

«I don't think many studies have realized this yet: Black carbon impacts global warming in at least four different ways,» said V. Ramanathan, an atmospheric scientist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography.

Cloudiness was likely to change in ways that could either enhance or diminish the warming, and scientists did not understand the complex processes well.

If you believe, along with almost every scientist who has studied the issue, that global warming poses a genuine threat to humanity, doesn't this suggest that we should be doing something about it?

All but one of the main trackers of global surface temperature are now passing more than 1 °C of warming relative to the second half of the 19th century, according to an exclusive analysis done for New Scientist.

Scientists estimate the pollutant was responsible for half the warming in the Arctic since 1890, and could be warming the globe with more than half the so - called «forcing» that carbon dioxide does.

But scientists are starting to learn how to design materials that do not always radiate more as they warm.

«Either the recent increases are not due to a warming climate, or a warming climate has implications for tornado activity that we don't understand,» says study author Michael Tippett, a climate scientist at Columbia University.

While most scientists don't dispute the link between global warming and extreme weather, the once skeptical public is now starting to come around — especially following 2011, when floods, droughts, heat waves and tornadoes took a heavy toll on the U.S..

According to a sample of scientists contacted by ClimateWire, however, the revised ETS does not much alter the picture of overall planetary warming or how humanity needs to respond to it.

By examining how Earth cools itself back down after a period of natural warming, a study by scientists at Duke University and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory confirms that global temperature does not rise or fall chaotically in the long run.

Conservationists applaud improvements in the reef's health and resilience, but caution that current government policies do far too little to counter global warming, which officials and scientists both agree is the greatest threat to the reef's long - term survival.

Moreover, their results were nonsynchronous: «Their analysis doesn't consider whether the warm / cold periods occurred at the same time,» says Peter Stott, a climate scientist at the U.K.'s Hadley Center for Climate Prediction and Research in Bracknell.

It won't do anything to help the climate in the next decade — a decade that scientists say is critical to arresting global warming and turning the world's energy infrastructure towards low - carbon sources.

Kevin Trenbeth, a climate scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., said the study didn't account for changes in sea surface temperatures, which are the main drivers of changes in the position of the rain belts (as is seen during an El Nino event, when Pacific warming pushes the subtropical jet over the Western U.S. southward).

«We're doing this research for commonsense reasons — as a potential solution to the challenges posed by the exhaustion of fossil fuels and global warming,» says Hiroaki Suzuki of JAXA's Advanced Mission Research Center, one of about 180 scientists at major Japanese research institutes working on the scheme.

New Scientist clearly does not espouse Bjørn Lomborg's Viewfinder soundbite when he calls for «a more reasoned, more constructive, and less frightening dialogue» on global warming (27 June, p 25).

«I do not know the source of that original document, but I assume it was sent to me because of my past exchanges with Heartland and because I was named in it,» said the scientist who has sparred often with Heartland and others who do not believe in the scientific underpinnings of man - made global warming.

This has created a growing pessimism within the scientific community, with the Guardian reporting that almost nine out of 10 climate scientists don't believe political efforts to restrict global warming to 2º Celsius will succeed.

Scientists do not believe Antarctica is in a precipitous state of warming right now.

They've said it before, but this time climate scientists are saying it with feeling: The world is warming; it's not all natural, it's us; and if nothing is done, it will get a whole lot worse.

The cooling effect of aerosols can partly offset global warming on a short - term basis, but many are made of organic material that comes from sources that scientists don't fully understand, said Joost de Gouw, a research physicist at NOAA's Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder, Colo., who is unaffiliated with the studies.

Erik Conway, co-author of Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, noted that there's even a word (which he did not coin) for manufacturing of fake knowledge — «agnogenesis.»

During his confirmation hearing, Bridenstine said he acknowledged that global warming was real and man - made, but wouldn't say that it was mostly human - caused, as the overwhelming majority of scientists and scientific literature have done.

For instance, if nothing is done to reduce the amount of heat - trapping gasses, such as carbon dioxide, in the atmosphere, Earth could be 5 to 15 degrees Fahrenheit (3 to 8 degrees Celsius) warmer by the end of century, said Sivan Kartha, a senior scientist at the Stockholm Environment Institute.

Also not all places are warming in lock - step; it's the average temp that going up, and (I think) it's even possible there could be greater variance or extremes (hotter hots, colder colds), as the average continues to go up (but I'm no scientist, and I don't really know).

I think you and others could do more to change attitudes in the U.S. on global warming by joining forces in putting pressure on NOAA administrators and NWS supervisors to educate the 5,500 meteorologists in 120 National Weather Service offices so the NWS scientists can help other government people and other meteorologists who enter people's private living rooms better understand climate change.

A group of scientists has now analyzed how people had responded to two of the questions: How much do you know about global warming, and how serious a threat does it pose to you and your family?

Every scientist in the country should put be ordered to put down their work and devote full effort to what can be done to save us as the sun grows warmer.

These analyses, whilst not disproving the anthropogenic global warming theory, do show that the climate we are in today is not unusual in recent history, and therefore the possibility of natural variability causing the warming can not be ruled out, as it seemingly has been by many «independent» scientists, and the IPCC.

98 % of actual climate scientists (a distinction Dr. Willie Soon does not earn) agree that global warming is real and primarily drive by humans burning fossil fuels like coal and oil.

Consider the oddball doctors who took tobacco money to deny a link between cigarette smoking and cancer, or the handful of scientists who take oil and coal money to discredit global warming science, or the people who have done both.

Anthropogenic CO2 emissions are presently increasing every year at an accelerating rate, and it is extremely unlikely that humanity will collectively do what is necessary to not only stop that growth in CO2 emissions, but reverse it, and then reduce emissions by 80 percent or more within 5 to 10 years, which is what mainstream climate scientists say is needed to avoid the worst outcomes of anthropogenic global warming.

He says scientists «now don't know if they have global warming» when there is absolutely zero doubt, even among scientists who are unconvinced climate change poses a major threat, that the planet is warming up.

It does not mean that human - caused global warming is not potentially dangerous... just read the published body of research since 1842... or better yet talk to research scientists who are actively publishing in this like I talk to them weekly.

Eric Fischer, co-author of the study and scientist at ETH Zurich in Switzerland, stated that with the warming the world has already experienced, they can see very clearly that a difference of 0.5 °C really does matter.

«They do a nice job showing that exceptionally warm temperatures from 2012 - 2014 amplified drought conditions for California,» Nate Mantua, a climate scientist at the Southwest Fisheries Science Center who has previously written about temperature variations in the region, said.

When climate scientists discuss the evidence with each other, the questions that matter to them are «Does the evidence show that the Earth's climate is warming, or not?»

But while the study adds to the weight of evidence that there is a connection between a warm Arctic and mid-latitude weather, it doesn't tackle the «critical question» of whether one causes the other, another scientist tells Carbon Brief.

Most scientists do agree that there's been a warming trend over the past 10 years that appears to be pushing the start of spring allergy season earlier in certain parts of the country; unfortunately, this doesn't mean it will end earlier.

Research Paper on Global Warming Did you know that the world famous scientists exploring the climate changes assert that global warming can not be changed during many cenWarming Did you know that the world famous scientists exploring the climate changes assert that global warming can not be changed during many cenwarming can not be changed during many centuries?

When climate scientists discuss the evidence with each other, the questions that matter to them are «Does the evidence show that the Earth's climate is warming, or not?»