Sentences with phrase «warming someone have seen»

But this shows that level as the basement lowest possible amount, with the highest about matching the total warming we have seen so far since the industrial revolution.

Called the «transient climate response», or TCR, this is an estimate of how much warming we'd see if we increased carbon dioxide by 1 % a year until levels had just doubled (about 70 years).

This bottler warmer is one of the simplest and most practical travel bottles warmer I have seen so far.

But knowing how much warming we've seen means comparing temperatures now to a time before the world started to feel the effects of industrialising.

Predictions of an intensification of malaria in a warmer world, based on extrapolated empirical relationships or biological mechanisms, must be set against a context of a century of warming that has seen marked global declines in the disease and a substantial weakening of the global correlation between malaria endemicity and climate.

These predictions are correct, although these models failed to predict the strong warming we've seen over the antarctic peninsula.

And it also tells me that this «something else» may be driving the long - term warming we've seen since the first real CET records in the 17th century or the current modern global record since around 1850, or the late 20th century warming cycle recorded by both satellites and at the surface, as well.

That warmists believe the velocity of warming must reverse, or move to a crawl without humans, or that without humans the velocity of warming would see only the slightest of advancement at more or less a constant rate, defies logic.

But more important than agreement with computer models is the fact that four years with no warming in the upper ocean does not erase the 50 years of warming we've seen since ocean temperature measurements became widespread....

He notes «I use the term carefully — reserving it for those who deny the most basic findings of the scientific community, which includes the fact that human activity is substantially or entirely responsible for the large - scale warming we have seen over the past century».

For one of the most expensive bottle warmers I have seen so far, that would be Maxx Elite «Digital Gentle Warm» Bottle Warmer.

What they do — and have done at length in one form since 2009 — is dispute in massive detail how the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has failed to make the case that what little global warming we've seen over the last 150 years is primarily driven by human activity.

The first, «equilibrium climate sensitivity», or ECS, is the total amount of warming we'd see if we instantly doubled levels of carbon dioxide and let the atmosphere and surface oceans respond.

However — and this is the important part — outside causes such as (but not limited to) these do not account for the amount of global warming we have seen.

This bleak future will be characterized by a 9.6 - degree Celsius (17 degrees Fahrenheit) increase in mean surface air temperature, nearly 10 times the warming we have seen to this point.

The warming we have seen is a result of the warming we have caused, minus the cooling we have caused.

From this assumption it is not as unreasonable to point out that there are still things about solar and natural variability such as AMO that we don't understand, and perhaps these are viable alternative explanations for the warming we have seen.

Your side, the side that says human emitted CO2 is the primary driver of climate change, and which (hubristically) says that natural variation can not explain all the warming we've seen, can not explain why the warming has apparently stopped for almost two decades.

When we actually account for thermal inertia and negative forcings, we find that the amount of warming we have seen is consistent with what the IPCC would expect, but inconsistent with Lindzen and Choi 2009.

Second, «the climate system itself is probably responsible for most of the warming we have seen in the last 100 years or so.

There is overwhelming evidence that this has enhanced the natural greenhouse effect, contributing to the warming we have seen over the last century or so.

If the warming we ve seen in the high Arctic continues, then there is a possibility of a new sea route, a Northwest Passage if you will, Vice Admiral Paul G. Gaffney II, former chief of naval research and the former president of National Defense University, said about the study.