Sentences with phrase «warming stopped in»

Now, I'm certainly not saying that global warming stopped in 1998, but the statements at the time were that temperatures would continue to rise beyond the 1998 levels.

For example, one sticky idea is the myth that global warming stopped in 1998.

It's better to focus on a few of these — warming stopped in 1998, water vapour is more important than CO2 etc — and politely annihilate his arguments.

No, it's not the old chestnut global warming stopped in 1998.

To claim global warming stopped in 1998 overlooks one simple physical reality - the land and atmosphere are just a small fraction of the Earth's climate (albeit the part we inhabit).

Yet nobody in their right mind would describe this as «global warming stopped in 1981, then again in 1983, then again in 1988 and again in 1990».

You couldn't possibly leave out «Global Warming Stopped in 1998».

Global warming stopped in 1998.»)

No better than the «warming stopped in 1998 crowd» really.

Sure the warming stopped in 1998.

Hello friends, I'd like to inform everyone of a new discovery — that global warming stopped in January 2008!

A frustratingly stubborn climate myth is that global warming stopped in 1998.

Tamino has an excellent update on «warming stopped in 1998» at http://tamino.wordpress.com/2008/09/12/dont-get-fooled-again/

And you'd be hard - pressed to find a real scientist who would hold a scientific belief that they couldn't prove, or would continue this belief if contrary evidence came out (real contrary evidence, not fluff like «global warming stopped in 1998).

If there was no «warming stopped in 1998» meme, CW13 would simply be known as a superior (to HadCRUT) method of dealing with the missing coverage.

Consider some of the arguments that are proposed and promoted by well - qualified scientists in the denialist camp: Global warming stopped in 1998.

It's pretty funny that the GWPF is predicting no warming based on statistical analyses that can't agree whether warming stopped in 1998 or 2002, and pretty funny that the two modeling techniques used deliver quite different forecasts, making not one, not two, but four different forecasts — all of which we are apparently supposed to take more seriously than anything that is based on, you know, physics.

There are many uncertainties in the science and the occasional finding that pokes holes in details, but claims that warming stopped in year X, there is an ice age imminent, etc. are given undue prominence when there is no real evidence for this sort of position, just as there is no real evidence that tobacco isn't a health hazard, or HIV doesn't cause AIDS.

So perhaps warming stopped in the mid-1990s?

If there was any truth to the claims that global warming stopped in the last 10 years, or since 1998, or since 1995, or whatever the latest claim is, then we can see from the earlier 20th Century example that we would already be seeing clear signs of that in declining trends over the last several 30 - year periods.

He's responsible for this graph showing that warming stopped in 2002:

But in his public speeches he says things he knows damn well are false — global warming stopped in 1998; Mars is warming too and there are no SUVs there; it's the sun, stupid!

Note: this post has been incorporated into the new rebuttal to the myth «No long tail means climate sensitivity is low», as well as «global warming stopped in [insert date]» and «Trenberth can't account for the lack of warming».

In the latest video over at Climate Crocks, Richard Alley debunks the myth that global warming stopped in [insert year] with some excellent anecdotes.

Note: the Foster and Rahmstorf results have been incorporated into the rebuttals to It's the sun (Intermediate and Advanced), A drop in volcanic activity caused warming, It's El Niño, Global warming stopped in [insert year], It hasn't warmed since 1998, and It's cooling

That because some people ride on airplanes, therefore global warming stopped in 1998?

Wegman is willing to punt away his statistical credibility by signing onto a statement that included the absurd claim that «Global warming stopped in 1998.»

We will look at the most common climate myths from «global warming stopped in 1998» to «global warming is caused by the sun» to «climate impacts are nothing to worry about.»

, «Global warming on Mars», Warming stopped in 1998 ″ and so on) is clearly incompatible with any kind of scepticism.

In March of 2014, they said global warming stopped in Augist of 1996.

By April of 2015, they said global warming stopped in December of 1996.

Warming stopped in 1997.

Or that global warming stopped in 1998.

When constantly confronted with this myth that global warming stopped in 1998, or 2000, or 2002, or 2005, or [insert year], we wonder why distinguishing between short - term noise and long - term signal is such a difficult concept for climate «skeptics.»

Note: this post has been incorporated into the rebuttals to «global warming stopped in [insert year]», and Figure 1 has been added to the SkS Climate Graphics Page

This finding undermines the many «skeptic» claims that global warming stopped in 1995 or 1998 or 2001 or 2005, etc. etc..

For those who came in late, this talking point has been around the delusionist blogosphere for some time, though with a lower profile than «global warming stopped in 1998», and was put as question to Phil Jones of UEA in a BBC interview.

And this IS compatible with a slightly changed claim that global warming stopped in September of 1998.

The Escalator, originally created as a simple debunking to the myth «Global warming stopped in [insert date]», turned out to be a very popular graphic.

And no, that is still not evidence that global warming stopped in September 1998.

Trends over short periods in noisy data are very noisy so that leads to huge errorbars on trend estimates and makes silly claims such as «global warming stopped in 1997» blatant falsehoods.

Look, if you want to say that it is POSSIBLE (in the sense of > 5 % chance) from the data that global warming stopped in 1998, then that might be a correct conclusion... But there is no real evidence to support the claim that it did.

«Global warming stopped in 1998.»

In which case you would have concluded warming stopped in 1987.

Are those the same «standard estimates for forcing» that can't explain why Global Warming stopped in the late 1990s or early 2000s, referred to as «The Pause?

If David Rose had gone to the trouble of asking he would have been told that there is no evidence that warming stopped in 1998 (or whatever) for the following reasons:

It certainly seems to me to be nonsense to say «warming stopped in 1997» when every one of the last 11 years bar one has been warmer than that, and this year almost certainly will be as well.

Are those the same «standard estimates for forcing» that can't explain why Global Warming stopped in the late 1990s or early 2000s...

Abandoning the discredited claim that warming stopped in 1997, one skeptic has moved on to claiming the globe started cooling since the end of 2000.

If people in 1996/97 looked at temperature graphs in the same way as some do today they would have concluded that warming stopped in 1987.