In this recent article, Bob Tisdale deconstructs the irrational and anti-science claims of a new global
warming study produced by a couple of prominent climate reality deniers.
Not exact matches
A new
study in Nature Climate Change finds that
warming and declines in soil moisture, but also vine management practices to lower yields to
produce better - quality grapes, brought the fruit to early maturity.
The
study also concludes that, over a 15 - year period, cutting the black carbon
produced by burning fossil fuels, vegetation, dung and other sources could reduce the
warming the Earth has experienced since the Industrial Revolution — about 0.8 degrees Celsius — by 17 to 23 percent.
Global
warming above 1.5 °C elsius, the ideal limit set by the 2015 Paris Agreement, will change the Mediterranean region,
producing ecosystems never seen throughout the last 10,000 years, a new
study reports.
«Over the past several decades, we've seen temperatures
warming and carbon dioxide increasing, and our
study found that this tropical forest has responded to that increase by
producing more flowers.»
Our
study of the faster increases in apparent temperature has
produced important findings for this kind of climate change impact assessment, providing a strong scientific support for more stringent and effective climate change mitigation efforts to combat global
warming.»
With no physical reasoning at all they attribute the difference to land use changes, despite the fact that no bottom up
study of land use changes
produces even a
warming, let alone one that matches their numbers.
The
study that came the closest to drawing a strong link between global
warming and California's recent drying was
produced by a pair of Stanford University researchers.
Soon is a leading skeptic of the widely accepted science surrounding climate change, In the International Journal of Public Opinion Research, a
study titled «The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change» found that 97 percent of scientists surveyed believed global
warming already is ongoing, with 84 percent of scientists surveyed believing human -
produced greenhouse gases were the driving force behind the change.
The
study is based on the profiles of
warm pixels in all the dark frames ever
produced by ACS between 2002 and 2011.
According to a
study published in Archives of Internal Medicine in 2008, spending 10 minutes in the noon sun during the
warm months
produces about 10,000 IU of vitamin D.
«For reusable cloth nappies the
study states «The baseline scenario based on average washer and drier use
produced a global
warming impact of approximately 570 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents.»
A Japanese
study showed that
producing a kilogram of beef leads to the emission of greenhouse gases with a global
warming potential equivalent to 36.4 kilograms of carbon dioxide (CO2).
Director Bennett Miller has
produced a
warm and generally agreeable character
study about the pratfalls of athletic institutions and the willingness to think outside the box.
Still a moving, exceptionally
produced social
study on family, Fox Home Video had the good sense to add Ford biographer Joseph McBride, who gives a
warm, engaging, and superb lecture on the film that alone is worth the price of the disc.
Common
warm - up activities in language arts classrooms, such as editing sentences, vocabulary
study, or journal prompts, may yield limited instructional benefits; but none
produce the same level of academic power as 15 minutes of reading time.
In the
study scientists at Scripps and their colleagues «have
produced the first clear evidence of human -
produced warming in the world's oceans, a finding they say removes much of the uncertainty associated with debates about global
warming».
«This
study — if you can even call it that — is exactly what the Union of Concerned Scientists said it needed to
produce five years ago in order to create «wrongdoers» of global
warming.
«
Warming in California has made it more probable that when a low precipitation year occurs, it occurs in
warm conditions and is more likely to
produce severe drought,» said lead
study author Noah Diffenbaugh, an associate professor in the School of Earth Sciences at Stanford.
Oh, and he never could answer the questions about Venus and Uranus, or
produce a
study showing water vapour
warms rather than cools.
Published in 2011, that
study produced a chart of sea levels that bounced up and down over time, changing with global temperatures, and then ticked sharply upward as industrialization triggered global
warming.
At a time when global
warming is projected to
produce more extreme weather, the
study provides the most comprehensive look yet at the influence of such events on crop area, yields and production around the world.
Nor have you
produced or cited a single
study which shows from world temperature and precipitation records that water vapour could
warm the surface.
The
study, which shows that trees planted in tropical regions can help fight climate change, found that global forests actually
produce a net
warming of the planet.
While the richest income class in this
study, earning more than 30,000 rupees a month,
produce slightly less than the global average CO2 emissions of 5 tonnes, this amount already exceeds the sustainable global average CO2 emissions of 2.5 tonnes per capita that needs to be reached to limit global
warming below 2 degrees centigrade.
By last week, a model
study had found that Totten alone could
produce nearly a meter of sea level rise before the end of this Century if global
warming forces ocean waters to heat up by 2 C or more near the Totten Glacier.
Collectively and pursuant to statutory authority, under the direction of these Executive Offices, the USGCRP directed an effort statutorily dedicated in part to
studying the state of the science and its uncertainties surrounding the theory of «global
warming» or «climate change,» ultimately
producing the National Assessment.
Calibration
studies show that unaspirated land - station temperature sensors
produce a systematic
warm - bias.
According to a report in The Mail on Sunday, NOAA scientist Dr. John Bates has
produced «irrefutable evidence» that the NOAA
study denying the «pause» in global
warming in the period since 1998 was based on false and misleading data.
Empirical evidence shows water vapor cools and you can not
produce any
study showing it
warms by nearly 30 degrees as the IPCC want you to be gullible enough to believe.
This is not to say models are funded in order to
produce warm trends, but that they are funded in the context of the
study of global temperatures and their policy implications.
They believe the
study supports their view that carbon emissions
produced through human activity continue to
warm the Earth far beyond what the planet can handle naturally.
A
study from the National Center for Atmospheric Research also predicts that
warmer oceanic and atmospheric temperature caused by climate change will
produce even fiercer hurricanes in the future.
A recent
study by Abbot and Tziperman (2008) shows that deep convective clouds can
produce significant winter
warming under ice - free conditions.
In a crude sense, to the extent that GCMs either replicate an AMO - like phenomenon, or
produce large but nonperiodic fluctuations in sea - surface temps (AMO - like in size but not periodicity), then implicitly, the alternative hypothes in those
studies (a world without global
warming) has a lot more variation in it than this
study does.
So, his very «incompetance» and lack of the relevant, formal, qualifications, means that one can't really expect him to
produce proper «scientific» work, and this kind of absolves him from the charge of malign and blatent dishonesty, because his understanding of the area of
study, climate change and global
warming, is just so lacking.
(CNSNews.com)-- A German scientist has accused the National Aeronautics and Space Agency's (NASA) Goddard Institute of Space
Studies (GISS) of altering temperature records between 2010 and 2012 to
produce the illusion that the Earth has been
warming since 1950.
Our scientists have
produced landmark
studies on the dangers of DDT, tobacco smoke, acid rain, and global
warming.
Assuming the simulated variability and model response to radiative forcing are realistic, the results of the present
study demonstrate that the combination of greenhouse gas forcing, sulfate aerosols, and internal variability could have
produced the early 20th century
warming, although to do so would take an unusually large realization of internal variability.
18F implies almost two degrees a decade, a huge number considering the
warming over the last decade has been close to zero and no decade has had
warming of more than about 0.3 F. Further, I am sure the Sierra Club found someone who actually
produced such a
study, but the IPCC «consensus», which I think is exaggerated, calls for only about 4 - 6F increases in the next century.