Not exact matches
And if these
policies were actually discussed publicly in that way (as being beneficial for many reasons
other than mitigating global
warming) perhaps we'd get out of the trap that Michael Crichton and his ilk continue to set for us.
Apparently, he thinks that only American politicians
other than the president should face electoral accountability on global
warming policy.
The Philadelphia Inquirer reported, «In the high - stakes conflict over U.S. climate - change
policy, groups that deny or cast doubt on global
warming brought in $ 7.2 million from 2003 to 2010... «Powerful funders are supporting the campaign to deny scientific findings about global
warming,» reported Robert J. Brulle...» In the eighth paragraph, the Inquirer noted the response by James Taylor of the Heartland Institute, who observed that many of the groups «support
other causes as well» and, in some cases, spend «less
than 10 percent of their funding... on climate - related efforts.»
The frigid weather, freezing families, record budget deficits, soaring unemployment — and complete failure of global
warming computer models to predict anything
other than «a
warmer than normal winter» — have caused a meltdown in Europe's longstanding climate and energy
policies.
Indeed, the putative threat of global
warming has received more of the President's public attention
than any
other foreign
policy issue during his second term.
> The Daily Mail has given more
than five times as much space to the Global
Warming Policy Foundation's views in its recent coverage of climate change and «green taxes»
than to any
other source.
Many — perhaps most — won't know that the Daily Mail gives so very much more space to the Global
Warming Policy Foundation
than to any
other source on climate / clean energy cost stories.
The Mail gives 5 times more space to the Global
Warming Policy Foundation
than to any
other source on climate
Rather
than engage the climate
policy proposals I and
others have put forward — like substituting prizes for subsidies, reducing regulatory barriers for alternative energies, increasing industry's carbon efficiency, and promoting efficiency gains in developing nations where such investments are most cost effective — they attack a straw man of «conservative orthodoxy that global
warming can be overcome by private companies operating in free markets with little or no help from the government.»
It may be the worst violator of human rights in history — it's killed more of its own people
than any
other government, ever — but to environmentalists, Communist China is the perfect partner in their effort to bully the world on Global
Warming policy.