Sentences with phrase «warming than loss»

Not exact matches

Symptoms of an overactive thyroid include weight loss (more than is healthy for adequate milk production); anxiety; increased heart rate or palpitations; insomnia; feeling over warm; and sweating.

If the warming was due to the sun getting hotter, there would be extra heat arriving during the day but nothing in particular to stop heat loss after dark, so days would warm faster than nights.

Mori et al. identified two circulation patterns that drove winter temperatures in Eurasia from 1979 to 2013: the Arctic Oscillation (which confines colder air to the polar latitudes) and a pattern dubbed «Warm Arctic and Cold Eurasia» (WACE), which correlated both to sea - ice loss in the Barents - Kara Sea and to particularly cold winters; its impact has more than doubled the probability of severe winters in central Eurasia.

Shivering and trying to warm the body by exercising only contribute to heat loss; the cold water absorbs the heat far more quickly than the body can create it and cools the extremities, which then cool the body's core.

«Ecuador: Deforestation destroys more dry forest than climate change: Study compares dry forest losses due to land use change or global warming.»

Although global warming is likely to change the distribution of species, deforestation will result in the loss of more dry forests than predicted by climate change damage.

«Warming greater than 2 degrees Celsius above 19th - century levels is projected to be disruptive, reducing global agricultural productivity, causing widespread loss of biodiversity and — if sustained over centuries — melting much of the Greenland ice sheet with ensuing rise in sea levels of several meters,» the AGU declares in its first statement in four years on «Human Impacts on Climate.»

Sex differences in heat loss responses are dependent on body size and not sex, meaning that larger individuals sweat more than smaller ones during cycle exercise in warm and tolerable conditions.

«This research indicates that although sea - ice loss does intensify the negative NAO, bringing more days of cold easterly winds, it also causes those same winds to be warmer than they used to be.

From his own research in chemical oceanography, along with data from a number of recent studies, Weber points out that some negative consequences of greenhouse gas emissions and warming «are manifesting faster than previously predicted,» including ocean acidification and oxygen loss, which are expected to affect «a large fraction of marine species if current trends continue unchecked.»

«It is still far from clear whether cold anomalies [in the mid-latitudes] are caused by Arctic warming (or sea ice loss) rather than being simply correlated with Arctic warming, but driven by something else.

This can only be possible if conductive warming of the cool skin layer from the ghg warmed air above can prevent more heat loss than an increase in evapoaration heat loss due to a ghg warmed atmosphere.

Like a warm comforting blanket on a frozen winter day or a cool glass of refreshing iced tea on a midsummer evening, Final Fantast VII has been more than a game; it's been a companion and friend through maybe own life of love, loss, and redemption.

Since OHC uptake efficiency associated with surface warming is low compared with the rate of radiative restoring (increase in energy loss to space as specified by the climate feedback parameter), an important internal contribution must lead to a loss rather than a gain of ocean heat; thus the observation of OHC increase requires a dominant role for external forcing.

Two things can be going on here, firstly, the loss in the tropics may be more than compensated for in the rest of the world (which is consistent with the extensive Southern Ocean warming observed by Gille (2002)-RRB-, and secondly, the data from the tropics may be less complete or accurate than claimed, although I am not aware of any specific reasons why that might be.

Here is what I understand of what they are saying: — In recent years the Arctic has been experiencing much warmer than usual temperatures and unusual loss in sea ice.

This warming is less than it will ultimately be, because the cool ocean surface holds back the warming — allowing more energy loss out the bottom than will ultimately be the case.

The pace of ice loss — both its extent and the amount of the older, thicker ice that survives from summer to summer — has been faster than most models predicted and clearly has, as a result, unnerved some polar researchers by revealing how much is unknown about ice behavior in a warming climate.

The bottom line, Dr. van de Wal said, is that Greenland is still losing much more ice than is being added through snowfall, and more losses will come in a warming world.

This is what I get out of it: the Arctic - ice - albedo situation is more complicated than earlier thought (due to clouds, sun - filled summers, dark winters, etc), but NET EFFECT, the ice loss and all these other related factors (some negative feedbacks) act as a positive feedback and enhance global warming.

Ice Loss 10 Times What Was Predicted Here's another reason to believe we must redouble our efforts to reduce global carbon emissions to slow global warming: Derek Mueller, an Arctic idea shelf specialist at Trent University in Ontario has told Reuters that 83 square miles of ice shelf, an area more than three times the size of the island of Manhattan, has been lost from Ellesmere Island this summer.

Artic climatologists are worried that the knee of the curve has already been reached on global warming reaching the positive - feedback stage because the ice loss this year was so dramatically greater than the trend of previous years.

I understand it is because in the last few years the temperature of the Earth has actually cooled so, rather than lose the momentum they had gained to make political inroads to underwrite global measures to control societies» behaviors when it comes to things like use of fossil fuels, proponents decided to cut their losses and change the term so they wouldn't be obviously wrong to the masses as it snowed on various global warming rallies.

However, I would keep in mind the fact that over a decade's time, we have seen more than a doubling of the rate of loss of mass balance in Greenland, a tripling in icequakes, the warming of the West Antarctic Peninsula resulting in the acceleration of glaciers, the accelerating loss of global glacier mass balance, etc..

If the air was much colder than the water, as it would be if it had just blown over from the land, then: a) If the rate of heat loss from the air was smaller than the rate of heat gain from the water, the air would warm.

The air can only warm as a result of the water freezing if the rate of energy loss from the air suddenly decreases while the water is in the process of freezing — but this is very much the exception rather than the rule.

However, despite near normal rates of ice loss during the month, June 2015 was a relatively warm month (Figure 7) with 925 hPa air temperatures up to 2.5 C higher than average near the North Pole and East Siberian Sea, with even warmer air temperatures in the Kara Sea (up to 4.5 C).

Trenberth has the burden to prove that: Anthropogenic global warming cause greater suffering and loss than during nature driven global warming than global cooling periods.

Atmospheric warming does not appear to contribute to ice mass loss from either the EAIS or WAIS, other than the «Peninsula».

What I am saying is that if Arctic sea ice loss is occurring faster than models predict, then, all else being equal, the earth should be warming faster than models predict.

Examples: Since leaves function more efficiently in diffuse light than in dappled bright - or - dark direct light, clearer skies will reduce carbon uptake: Mercado et al. (2009); a multi-year study of grass found carbon uptake sharply decreased in hotter summers: Arnone et al. (2008); warming kills plankton, resulting in less emission of DMS and thus less cooling clouds: Six et al. (2013); changes in Arctic rivers and coastlines could bring more carbon loss than models anticipated: Abbott et al. (2016).

So, there remains a possibility — rather than warming causing sea ice loss, sea ice loss is causing warming.

Mark Campanale of the thinktank Carbon Tracker Initiative said the actual financial losses from unchecked global warming could be higher than estimated by the financial model behind the new study.

The implication of such research is that study of shorter - lived, tinier creatures may provide more information about adaptation and loss in the rapidly warming Arctic than, for instance, study of seals and polar bears.

That's one trillion dollars each and every year — the loss in annual revenue for the coal industry if the world takes serious action to prevent global warming, rather than just continuing on in business - as - usual.

Although Antarctica contains 14 times more ice than Greenland, Greenland has lost between 2 and 5 times more ice than Antarctica.33, 34 Based on changes in gravity, most areas of Antarctica have slightly gained ice designated by greenish tones.24 However where warm waters and winds of the Circumpolar current approach the Peninsula, there has been moderate ice loss designated by bluish tones.

Furthermore, the Arctic has warmed more than twice as fast as the global average, a phenomenon known as Arctic amplification, and stimulated by the combined increasing Arctic temperatures and rapid loss of sea ice in all seasons along with declining snow cover in the spring and early summer.

Nonetheless, if the study means what I think it does, it will be a long time before any «short - term» (multi-decadal) trend in hurricane losses can be attributed to global warming rather than to socio - economic factors and / or natural variability.

Unprecedented warm temperatures lead to the loss of more than half of the sea ice cover in the Bering Sea in two weeks, resulting in record lows for Arctic Ocean sea ice extent for the month of February.

Another favourite climate nostrum was upturned when Pope warned that the dramatic Arctic ice loss in recent summers was partly a product of natural cycles rather than global warming.

According to a study published Monday, global sea level rise is accelerating as a result of ocean water warming and sooner - than - expected ice loss from the west Antarctica and Greenland ice sheets, and could reach 26 inches by 2100.

Alaska's Arctic lakes now freeze later and thaw earlier in the year than in 1950, leaving them vulnerable to water loss from evaporation and possibly adding to local warming, a new study finds.

The loss of ice cover means that the Arctic will warm even more rapidly than before, threatening

Self, if the average they are using only relates to a warming trend is anything other than ice loss logical?

Therefore, any increase in losses could, more likely than not, be partly related to anthropogenic climate change... we advance the premise that if losses are affected by natural climate fluctuations, they are also likely to be affected by additional global warming due to anthropogenic climate change.

Rather than the AD pattern being relevant and impacting the Beaufort Sea, a key factor for sea ice loss in the last month is the strong continuing positive North Atlantic Oscillation pattern bringing warm temperatures to the North of Eurasia (Figure 4).

So if on shined that laser on a square meter for say 10 mins then the 1 mm depth of square meter could warm by about 1 C. Rather than water one could also heat up anything with a thin surface [and assuming one reduces the heat loss] So thin sheet of paper which absorbs [has heat capacity of whatever wavelength one is using could heated within mins of exposure.

He says that rather than global warming we should be worrying about stratospheric cooling and the resultant loss of ozone which he categorises as disastrous.

As a matter of fact, adaptation to climate change, building resilience and dealing with loss and damages will challenge the world just as much as the necessity of mitigating global warming to no more than two degrees Celsius or less.

However, since days are generally warmer than nights, the resulting loss of heat by radiation at night is much smaller than the energy reflected by clouds during daytime.