Sentences with phrase «warming theory demonstrates»

And the dangerous global warming theory demonstrates nothing more than the human capacity for panic (or an attempt to cause panic in order to increase profits and / or political power).

Not exact matches

There are already many excellent volumes that capably expose the fraudulent theories about ozone depletion, global warming, pollution, pesticides, cancer risks, nuclear power, PCBs, asbestos, acid rain, deforestation, carbon dioxide, biodiversity, soil depletion, etc. 2 Rather, we hope to demonstrate convincingly that concerns about the environment (some overblown, others completely fabricated) are being cynically exploited by influential individuals and organizations whose goal includes building a global tyranny.

In fact, Trump and his team cheerfully accept what experiment has established and theory demonstrated — that there is a greenhouse effect, and that some warming is to be expected.

Proof that this was politically - driven and not based on demonstrated anthropogenic warming is that a year or so later the IPCC's then Chief Scientist, Sir John Houghton, told me that AGW was as yet an unproven theory (when briefing a small group of central agency policy - makers in Canberra).

It is not credible to suggest the reports were biased in favour of the theory of anthropogenic global warming when the evidence demonstrates the IPCC were, in fact, so cautious.

What is the point of providing a quote pertaining to an untested hypothesis when what is clearly being asked for is the replicable experiments which demonstrate that «Anthropogenic Global Warming» is indeed a theory (and not a falsified hypothesis)?

I think we can dispute how much warming per doubling of CO2 the data support, but I think it's a going to be a very difficult task demonstrating a plausible mechanism (by plausible I mean something that isn't completely eliminated by existing observation and well - established theory) that set t the sensitivity to CO2 to «zero» above some threshold CO2 value.

If contrarians want to deal a devastating blow to global warming theories, they should use the public data and develop their own credible models to demonstrate sound alternatives.

However in the case of Randi one need only demonstrate one phenomenon that defies rational explanation, but with the global warming and evolution challenges one has to prove a theory holds in all cases and under all conditions — a bar which can be placed arbitrarily high.