A cache of leaked emails that show some leading global
warming theory proponents acting less than nobly has caught the attention not only of the New York Times but also of the Charlottesville - based scientist often slammed by the errant emailers.
Not exact matches
So far, the GCR -
theory proponents have not offered any explanation for how GCR can cause a
warming if there has been no trend in the GCR since 1952.
I then refer you to the gravity anomalies, shown in the GRACE maps, and as ocean
warming proponents, consider whether a
theory such as that would bolster the arguments that your mathematics already seem to show.
Raymond wrote, «
Proponents of the global
warming theory say that higher levels of greenhouse gases — especially carbon dioxide — are causing -LSB-...]
What Felix Vasquez Jr. said when reviewing Life of Pi also applies to AGW
theory in the modern world of Western academia — i.e.,
proponents of global
warming endorse the notion of blind faith, and denial as a positive character trait.
... Other
proponents of the «chemtrails»
theory say it is an attempt to control global
warming, while some cite far more sinister goals, such as population control and military weapons testing.»
All the changes made by the IPCC and
proponents of the anthropogenic global
warming theory (AGW) were not done to adjust to new evidence or correct previous errors.
In an effort to reach out to
proponents of global
warming theory who have been unhappy with the behavior found in the Climategate emails, I decided to establish a forum on Reassessing Global Warming on Nature's
warming theory who have been unhappy with the behavior found in the Climategate emails, I decided to establish a forum on Reassessing Global
Warming on Nature's
Warming on Nature's Forums.
This has never made much sense in the context of greenhouse
warming theory (though its
proponents have tied themselves into pretzels trying to explain it) since global
warming theory (as embodied in the last IPCC report) holds that the largest temperature gains should be in the lower troposphere over the tropics, and offers no reason why the
warming in the Artic should be orders of magnitude larger than in the Antarctic.
The Gulf Stream and Atlantic circulation patterns are far more robust than this
theory assumed, and, even if the Gulf Stream changes,
proponents of the
theory were overestimating the dependence of Europe on Gulf Stream
warming.