Sentences with phrase «warming theory suggests»

In fact, warming theory suggests that you'd see -LSB-...]

There are supposed to be subtle changes in relative humidity in different layers and latitudes depending on temperature changes but global warming theory suggests relative humidity should stay more - or-less stable.

Given there is much more water vapour in the lower levels of the atmosphere, the study really found that there was a decline in overall global relative humidity when global warming theory suggests it should stay more - or-less stable.

A global warming theory suggests that if the caps shrink due to warming, then they will reflect less sunlight and so Earth will warm even further.

Not exact matches

Pokorny's work, coupled with a controversial new theory called the «biotic pump,» suggests that transforming landscapes from forest to field has at least as big an impact on regional climate as greenhouse gas — induced global warming.

Many theories have been suggested to explain why the Earth is currently in a global warming hiatus, from volcanoes to air pollution to sunspots.

Current theories suggest that the Staphylococcus aureus (staph) or group A streptococcus (strep) bacteria cause the TSS infection and that wearing a tampon (with its rough surface) in the dark, warm and moist environment of the vagina can increase the chances of this infection.

The theory suggests that the system is pushed by greenhouse gas changes and warming — as well as solar intensity and Earth orbital eccentricities - past a threshold at which stage the components start to interact chaotically in multiple and changing negative and positive feedbacks — as tremendous energies cascade through powerful subsystems.

The water vapour theory suggests that a small increase in CO2 will result in a large positive feedback loop from water vapour and this feedback loop will lead to dangerous warming.

The old theory of climate suggests that warming is inevitable.

This suggests to me that he was getting the basics more or less right, which in turn emphasises the point that the best models and theory we have all predict and have consistently predicted the same thing: warming, and quite a bit of it by the end of this century if we keep dumping CO2 in the atmosphere at our current rates.

Theory certainly suggests that a warmer atmosphere as a result of higher CO2 concentrations will emit photons more frequently — and more of these will by chance find a path to space restoring the conditional equilibrium between ingoing and outgoing radiation — the condition being that all other things remain equal.

«Future projections based on theory and high - resolution dynamical models consistently suggest that greenhouse warming will cause the globally averaged intensity of tropical cyclones to shift towards stronger storms,» Knutson et al. (2010); Grinsted et al. (2013) projected «a twofold to sevenfold increase in the frequency of Katrina magnitude events for a 1 °C rise in global temperature.»

Basic theory suggests the hot spot should occur whenever there is global warming, whatever its cause.

The crux of Bates» claim is that NOAA, the federal government's top agency in charge of climate science, published a poorly - researched but widely praised study with the political goal of disproving the controversial global warming hiatus theory, which suggests that global warming slowed down from 1998 until 2012 with little change in globally - averaged surface temperatures — a direct contrast to global warming advocates» claim that the earth's temperature has been constantly increasing.

Under heavy political pressure from the Obama administration and other governments, the UN ran with the theory, despite the lack of any observable evidence to suggest the deep ocean is actually eating the UN's predicted global warming.

Lindzen has IIRC variously argued that it has not warmed as much as the AGW theory suggests it ought to have, and that there is a negative feedback.

But Lindzen has gone too far, Schneider says, because, given the complexity of the subject, it makes no sense to focus on a few unexplained aspects of human - induced warming when the overwhelming indicators — along with current temperature and weather patterns — suggest that the theory is right.

Chance that increased GHGs are expected to lead to warming on the scale of the observed warming: this requires estimates of climate sensitivity, ocean heat uptake, etc., but I would think that basic theory suggests that increased GHGs could be responsible for much more than the observed warming.

«In light of the above findings, it appears that sea ice cover in the Bohai Sea is not quite as sensitive to CO2 - induced global warming as climate model projections / theory suggest it should be.

Other theories suggest runaway global warming was involved, due either to release of sea - floor methane clathrates, or even burning coal fields.

If the prediction of 2C warming holds true, and there is NO Theory or science that suggests it is wrong, then the human species will see a climate that it has not experienced before.

It is not credible to suggest the reports were biased in favour of the theory of anthropogenic global warming when the evidence demonstrates the IPCC were, in fact, so cautious.

This suggests that the rest of the world is not warming much at all (Willis's look at Argo data and his «governor» theory of climate suggests that equatorial temps haven't warmed significantlyl.)

There is also some anecdotal evidence suggesting that some peer reviewers and editors have been actively trying to prevent critics of man - made global warming theory from publishing their research, e.g., here, here, here, here and here.

Scaling the results from both theory as well as climate model projections suggest, then, that roughly 3 % of hurricane rainfall today can be reasonably attributed to manmade global warming.

The theory suggests that the system is pushed by greenhouse gas changes and warming — as well as solar intensity and Earth orbital dynamics — past a threshold at which stage the components start to interact chaotically in multiple and changing negative and positive feedbacks — as tremendous energies cascade through powerful subsystems.

I will suggest it comes from the same person who gave the «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» phrase its first major media traction as a «smoking gun» indictment of skeptic climate scientists, Ross Gelbspan.

AGW theory suggests a warming surface..

Now in theory one could suggest that the DLR warms up the ocean bulk first and then the warmer ocean bulk warms up the ocean skin but for that to be the case the DLR would need to somehow get past the ocean skin.

In a piece headed Crichton's conspiracy theory, Harold Evans described Crichton's theory as being «in the paranoid political style identified by the renowned historian Richard Hofstadter,» and went on to suggest that «if you happen to be in the market for a conspiracy theory today, there's a rather more credible one documented by the pressure group Greenpeace,» namely the funding by ExxonMobil of groups opposed to the theory of global warming.

The theory suggests that the system is pushed by greenhouse gas changes and warming — as well as solar intensity and Earth orbital eccentricities — past a threshold at which stage the components start to interact chaotically in multiple and changing negative and positive feedbacks — as tremendous energies cascade through powerful subsystems.

Traditional global warming theory would suggest winter warming trends, but several regions such as those we deal with here have a negative trend in temperature over the last 25 years.