Sentences with word «warmist»

Instead of indulging in Warmist folderol of the distractive, or lateral arabesque varieties, maybe you could read what I write, and quote the parts that you disagree with.

I realize that asymmetric moderation policies are the norm for warmist blogs which is not suprising considering the asymmetric peer review applied to climate research publication, but that doesn't make it right.

As warmists like Kevin Trenberth grow more and more desperate and see every weather event as more «proof» of man - made global warming, the more apt metaphor for them would be «witch doctor.»

There are numerous examples of outrageous personal abuse etc etc from warmists on this - and other - blogs.

But the Little Ice Age is not warmists» only antagonist.

However, global warmists like yourself do not practice science, you practice a religion.

Craig asks about polar bear reporting in the Telegraph: Polar bear expert barred by global warmists

Is it taboo for anyone on warmist side to admit this?

And it throws out the argument I have seen time and time again in warmist blogs (and, more subtly or more weasely, depending on your goodheart, in the IPCC report) that models are solid because they are based on first principle laws and physics verified in the laboratory.

They all have two things in common: 1) almost all show wide temperature variations in sync with solar activity (note here I write «activity» and not «irradiance», and it sure would be nice if warmist scientists some day learned the difference) and 2) they all disagree with the IPCC CO2 - centric computer simulations.

There are over 30 postulated warmist causes for lowering the world temperature, Steven.

Mann - made warmists say this does not disprove AGW, it is just a freak event temporarily hiding the undeniable, unprecedented, unrelenting global warming which is due to man burning fossil fuels and we need loads of nuclear NOW.

This binary approach is also on show when warmists try to equate the climate debate with Creationism and Flat Earthism.

Satellite measurements might be «close enough for many applications», but even warmists scientists admit they can't actually measure the alleged imbalance because the instruments aren't precise and accurate enough.

It has been used as the basis for climate sensitivity calculations by many warmists.

In short, the administration needs to keep the prospect of CO2 litigation chaos alive in order to sustain the «greenhouse protection racket» — the strategy of regulatory extortion — on which warmists increasingly rely to promote their agenda.

As warmist dogma demands that we are warming?

We've all seen warmists get carried away on the heady brew of AlGorehol, let's not do the same ourselves.

The fake Heartland document, like the Climategate emails, is evidence of how warmists wage their campaign.

Interior Secretary wants blindly faithful warmists only in her department.

I contend that, rhetoric notwithstanding, warmists positions do have serious negative impacts on those least able to pay the costs.