Are all of the alarmist
warmistas in a world - at - risk tizzy over projections of catastrophe by computer models, or are they engaged in making predictions of impending doom, based on models and all manner of other misinterpreted evidence and made up nonsense?
This is the «stupid strawman» defense so loved
by warmistas.
That apparently is the
only warmista pro CAGW site I'd visited on my own moore than once.
Your writings have been hard
core warmista for as long as I have reading your posts.
This week there are a spate of news stories about a little ice age coming — even from the
uber warmista Potsdam Institute.
Nonetheless,
warmistas such as DeSmog Blog, which published the purloined Heartland documents, applaud Gleick as a whistle blower, and stubbornly insist the fake strategy memo isgenuine, loudly denounced Climategate as the work of an «illegal hack» of emails «stolen» from the CRU server.
Confronted with obstinate refusal by nature to comply with climate model predictions / projections, she now has serious doubts and makes it very clear to the ragbag collection of
looney warmista that, like it or not, they have a very uncomfortable reality to confront.
Read up on some science concepts to try and understand that thought which, apparently is a bit complex for the
average warmista.
i'm just as sure as
you warmistas that we are UNDENIABLY screwing / polluting the planet towards armageddon.
this impresses me as more of a sign of
the warmistas» desperation to validate their models than of those predicting cooling over the next few decades.
I do understand that the La Nina is the faint thread of hope that
you warmistas cling to in the hope that you can explain global cooling with a short term weather event.
He considers
the warmistas» monumental failures are finally denting the faith in them by the commentariat and politicians.»
Chastise those who called attention to Bevan's behavior, praise the trolls for actually harming
the warmista cause and then further advance your idea that the trolls are really skeptics.
Now that real scientists have got involved and have asked what the overwhelming evidence is, and have been answered with a resounding silence (other than b * llsh!t), we now have
warmista - in - chief having to flail away to try to concoct some «evidence».....
It seems to me that even a 1 - year drop in ocean temperatures is a big problem for
the warmistas.