Sentences with phrase «warmists get»

Warmists get all excited about weather variations, and promote all sorts of scary nonsense supposedly related to CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere.

«What else can the warmists get wrong?»

If there's a cold batch of years during a mass melt of the Greenland ice cap, the same denialists who insisted that the Greenland ice cap would never retreat will be boasting that warmists got it wrong.

Not exact matches

«It means we can get on with enjoying our lives and our freedom untroubled by the apocalyptic naggings of warmists, freezists and all other party - pooping hysterics,» Perigo concludes.»

So you think Skeptics don't get threatened?Didn't Santer want to beat the crap out of Pat Michaels?And why shouldn't skeptics be allowed free speech instead of the warmists trying to silence them?

The warmists seem to think Gleick is going to get off scot free, is identity theft not prosecutable?

Bill says he's got a paper in press about warming effects on lake life, so I suspect he does know a number of «peer - rev'd» similar studies — they may be warmists, but what matters is nailing any details of their evidence that shows bias etc..

The Holocene / Crapocene ice has melted long, long time ago, new ice has deposited: Willis, that Greenland old ice supposed to be Skeptic; s crap; why are you getting stuck into it; did you run out of Warmist lies / misleadings?!? http://globalwarmingdenier.wordpress.com/2012/08/25/skeptics-stinky-skeletons-from-their-closet/

Lord Monckton got off more lightly a few months ago, the Al Warmists present were well - behaved and civilized.

I consider myself very open minded and get incensed that these dogmatic warmists refusing to accept the truth.

Sceptics looked at all the warmist's ships getting stuck in the Antarctic ice and decided there was no point in joining them.

Mosher, if I understand him, keeps saying: the orthodox (I don't know if he would say «warmists») have an up - and - running theory, complete with models from super-computers, academic credentials, etc., and by the way: political decision - makers — the real powers that be — asked for all this, funded it, and got what they asked for.

In response to the release of Fred Singer's emails about the film «Merchants of Doubt,» Ray wrote, «We skeptics have got Warmists on the defense, a pathetic «ad hominem» defense though it is.»

No, thank you, please, I've got warmists» disease And pauses chill my soul down to its core

The warmist idiots never got around to producing any evidence, but they nevertheless never let go of the idea.

Vaughn, instead of an EXTREME Warmist; you are starting to sound as a Fake Skeptic (as inbedded Warmist in the Skeptic's camp) What did they do to you; did they promise you more rip - off money — or are you starting to run with one leg on each side of a barbed wire fence... will get even more painful!!!

In any case, it's too little late for Obama's injustice department to get any such convictions, but perhaps President Trump or Cruz should use RICO to go after radical Warmists all over the world.

Now is your chance you thought I did, or you got that impression, or the consensus made you fabricate the statement, or any of the other silly Witless Warmist attempts to justify the unjustifiable.

It takes 17 years to get the warmists to even talk about a «pause».

Have you got any facts, Steven, or do model «experiments» replace observed data in your Warmist denialist world?

Now, you've got your Apple - lovers (aka: warmists or hysterics) who seek to discern the «signal» of combustion's consequence in warming a planet between 2 / 3rds & 3 / 4ths covered by oceans whose mixed layer is some ten times as massive as its air.

I laugh when I get called a warmist or alarmist, because the discordance with reality is so clear to me.

The main problem with the rank and file warmists is that they aren't dealing with facts — they're living in a fantasy world, where the «reward» is that they get to feel morally superior to everyone who doesn't agree with them.

Other warmists have presumed the CO2 = CAGW hypotheses are confirmed because they're «just like gravity», and have likewise incorrectly used the presumption that CO2 = CAGW scepticism is «the same as» the attempt of the tobacco industry to deny or cover up the damage done by tobacco, as proof of CO2 = CAGW, when all they are really doing is getting nowhere by «begging the question».

Is «roughly» the flexible Warmist term for «I haven't got the faintest idea what I'm talking about», or is it a scientific measurement?

What gets me is it seems that every single adjustment, whether «justified» or not, is always made to the benefit of the warmist case.

If my understanding of your argument is correct, it is not the «warmists» who are getting away with something, it is the «skeptics».

I imagine the modern would - be world ruling Warmists have altered this to read: «Whatever happens, we have got the Hockey - Stick, and they have not.»

Looks like the warmists are getting SLAPP happy (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation).

For instance, if we divide the respondents into «sceptics» and «warmists» on the basis of their assent to / dissent from the statement, «I believe that burning fossil fuels increases atmospheric temperature to some measurable degree», and then compare those groups» assent to / dissent from popular conspiracy theories, we get the following result:

You have to get read of the pagan beliefs, if you want Warmist to take you seriously.

I predict once the adjusted, manipulated and hidden data has been investigated by honest scientist we will get a cooling effect on the warmist zeal — Coming soon to a taxpayer financed institutions!

The Royal Society is also the alma - mater (sort of: if ex-press officers count) of rabid pit bull Bob Ward, now spokesman for the warmist Grantham Institute, who can often be heard on the wireless getting very cross with people who don't believe in ManBearPig.

Such tours could be extended for many months, well beyond any rational «payback» in book sales, if the real aim were to get media exposure — for instance by challenging local warmists to debates on the premises of the newspaper or broadcaster, etc..

Before Jack Savage and I and a lot of others were banned, we sceptics would consistently get about five times as many «recommends» as the warmist comments.

Warmists will argue that the bands just get wider,

ds >> Speaking of impossible things how does the warmist explain ocean getting warmer due to CO2 without warming the air containing the CO2?

The taxes of «fossil - fuel interests» also gets misappropriated to enhance the political message of the Global Warmist lobby.

ever notice that your biggest global warmists want to drain all the dirt hutters that breed like rabbits from the most oil rich countries to westernify them & make sure they all get licenses to drive exxon dependent cars?

Dessler himself is a big warmist and expresses his bias this way: «Everything shows that the climate models are probably getting the water vapor feedback right, which means that unless we reduce emissions, it is going to get much, much warmer on our planet by the end of the century.,» That was in 2009.

Speaking of impossible things how does the warmist explain ocean getting warmer due to CO2 without warming the air containing the CO2?

Previous attempts to link me with warmist assault clowns or get me to engage with them have failed.

Plimer's 2011 book — How to Get Expelled From School (launched by John Howard and mailed by the IPA to hundreds of schools)-- listed 101 questions for sceptical students to ask their «warmist» teachers, i.e. those who respect science.

Secular Warmist / Skeptics believers on the street, which are 80 % of the people; would like to know the truth — unfortunately the media get their informations from the Fundamentalist in both camps.

Warmists say it is getting warmer.

lolwot: «It seems warmists are more than happy to engage and support PR as soon as they get in front of a camera.

Winters in Europe have been getting more severe over the past years and it will be fun to see the Warmists explain the ice flows.

Plus, when we get a cold spell in UK, or snow in Copenhagen we are endlessly reminded by the warmists that that is just weather not climate.

I think you'll find as most skeptics (like my self) have that you'll get a much better level of balanced discussion on so called «skeptic» blogs than you will on so called «warmist» (i.e. pro-AGW) blogs / forums.

The ones that show lower temperatures get used by skeptics and the ones that show higher temperatures get used by warmists.