And melting permafrost could release carbon into the atmosphere, creating another feedback loop that
warms the planet even further.
The alarmists guessed that it would increase the height of moist air around the planet, which would
warm the planet even further, because the moist air is also a greenhouse gas.
Not exact matches
If a Republican candidate would say, — yes
even if a messiah is coming, people had been saying that for 2000 years, therefore, we are all obliged to preserve the
planet for future generations and human activities do excessively cause global
warming.
Because our knowledge of the many delicate balances in the ecology of the
planet is still in its infancy, and because what is known is not widely understood, the consequences of what the human race is (in its ignorance) doing to the earth may turn out to be
even more serious than global
warming.
Land developers burn forests in Latin America to feed the cattle that fill the cavernous appetites of fast food chains in the United States — and the entire
planet gradually
warms, leaving
even the experts in doubt about the future of our global ecology.
These days the Martian atmosphere is thin and about 95 per cent CO2, but scientists think that 3 or 4 billion years ago the
planet's gassy envelope was much thicker and
even richer in carbon, making its surface
warm enough to support liquid water — and possibly life.
Dan Hooper and Jason Steffen of Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, calculate that the dark matter that lies at the heart of the galaxy could heat an alien world enough to make it habitable,
even without the
warm glow of starlight (see «Dark matter could make
planets habitable»).
A Swiftly
Warming Planet By the time Callendar died in 1964, he had grown disconcerted by a troubling inconsistency in the data: Even as carbon dioxide continued to rise, his warming trend vanished by the late
Warming Planet By the time Callendar died in 1964, he had grown disconcerted by a troubling inconsistency in the data:
Even as carbon dioxide continued to rise, his
warming trend vanished by the late
warming trend vanished by the late 1930s.
A new study takes aim at the mysterious relationship between clouds and climate, and it finds that a
warmer planet could mean fewer clouds, which would mean an
even more sultry future for the
planet
Even if all the individual pledges are met, the
planet will keep on
warming — almost certainly past the internationally agreed threshold of acceptable risk, 2...
But for planetary scientists, Jupiter's most distinctive mystery may be what's called the «energy crisis» of its upper atmosphere: how do temperatures average about as
warm as Earth's
even though the enormous
planet is more than fives times further away from the sun?
Short - lived climate pollutants are so called because
even though they
warm the
planet more efficiently than carbon dioxide, they only remain in the atmosphere for a period of weeks to roughly a decade whereas carbon dioxide molecules remain in the atmosphere for a century or more.
Yet there are tantalizing clues that the Red
Planet's climate was much more inviting in the past —
warm and wet,
even — with lakes, rivers, and other watery features we see on Earth.
In 2007, it was uncertain
even whether clouds cooled or
warmed the
planet overall.
Water covering the surface interacts with carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in ways that can turn chilly
planets frigid and make
warm ones
even hotter.
Such scaremongering is especially painful to me because
even though I do not think that government - approved GMO foods pose meaningful health risks to consumers, and
even though I believe strategic genetic engineering can be an important tool to ease human suffering on our
warming and resource - constrained
planet, I share the concerns of many environmentalists about the homogenization and consolidation of the global food system — trends that are accelerated by the spread of industrially produced GMOs.
Over a simulated interval of 200 million years, the inner
planet slowly migrated
even farther inward to become a «
warm Jupiter» orbiting its parent star at about the same distance Mercury does in our solar system, the researchers report online today in Science.
While CO2 persists in the atmosphere for centuries, or
even millennia, methane
warms the
planet on steroids for a decade or two before decaying to CO2.
Sea ice and snow cover loss create a feedback look that can accelerate global
warming; with fewer reflective surfaces on the
planet, more sunlight can thereby be absorbed, driving surface temperatures
even higher, the scientists explained.
Climate models do not predict an
even warming of the whole
planet: changes in wind patterns and ocean currents can change the way heat is distributed, leading to some parts
warming much faster than average, while a few may cool, at least at first.
We spewed so much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and denuded so much of the
planet's greenery that we succeeded in
warming everything up to an
even more chaotic and less predictable state.
Even if climate negotiations in Paris are successful, the
planet is locked into long - term
warming and an uncertain future.
Once that growth rate tails off, additional carbon released from the ground will enter the atmosphere and make the
planet even warmer.
As the
planet warms, droughts are getting
even drier — and they're getting hotter too.
[Response: High northern latitudes were
warmer 5000 years ago (or
even 9000 years ago) but the tropics were probably cooler, and in the mean the
planet was probably not that different from now.
The incredible heat so far this year —
even though it is only two months in — could set the
planet up for its third record
warm year in a row, besting the record set just last year.
Hence, Earth - type life around flare stars may be unlikely because their
planets must be located very close to dim red dwarfs to be
warmed sufficiently by star light to have liquid water (about 0.007 AU for Proxima), which makes flares
even more dangerous around such stars.
Even 5 degrees F. makes this arm of Antarctica pointing toward South America one of the fastest
warming parts of the whole
planet.
Even if we focus exclusively on global surface temperatures, Cowtan & Way (2013) shows that when we account for temperatures across the entire globe (including the Arctic, which is the part of the
planet warming fastest), the global surface
warming trend for 1997 — 2015 is approximately 0.14 °C per decade.
According to Wordsworth, «
Even then, however, the
warm / wet early Mars does not explain the patchwork of Martian water erosion features and valley networks observed on the
planet today, and why these features tend to be concentrated near the
planet's equator.»
Methane is a greenhouse gas 300 times as potent as CO2, so it would be capable of
warming the
planet,
even with the weaker sun.
Hence, Earth - type life around flare stars may be unlikely because their
planets must be located very close to dim red dwarfs to be
warmed sufficiently by star light to have liquid water (between 0.02 and 0.05 AU for Wolf 424 A and B with an orbital period in 3 and 12 days), which makes flares
even more dangerous around such stars.
Well, for the sake of arguement,
even if they're right, this doesn't mean ipso facto AGW can't happen, it just means there are other factors that can
warm or cool a
planet.
Even as greenhouse gas pollution has
warmed the
planet's surface in recent decades,
warming rates across the West have been exceptionally rapid.
He says scientists «now don't know if they have global
warming» when there is absolutely zero doubt,
even among scientists who are unconvinced climate change poses a major threat, that the
planet is
warming up.
The Arctic is
warming more than twice as fast as the rest of the
planet, because as ice melts at the top of the world, there is less of it to reflect sunlight back into space, so more of it is absorbed by ocean waters; more absorbed sunlight means
even warmer temperatures, which means more ice melt a circular process known as Arctic amplification.
Cooling sea - surface temperatures over the tropical Pacific Ocean — part of a natural
warm and cold cycle — may explain why global average temperatures have stabilized in recent years,
even as greenhouse gas emissions have been
warming the
planet.
The research published by a team from the Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR) at the University of Colorado actually finds that Colorado gets snowfall at some of the
warmest temperature on the
planet, with snow falling
even when temperatures are approaching 4 degrees Celcius.
But never mind,
even if there is a CET period with faster and bigger
warming than any today, that's not
warming of the whole
planet.
Leading Warmist know that is no» global
warming» so they encompassed» climatic changes» to confuse and con the ignorant — so that when is some extreme weather for few days on some corner of the
planet, to use it as proof of their phony global
warming and ignore that the weather is good simultaneously on the other 97 % of the
planet,
even though is same amount of co2.
Even if you blame ALL the warming since 1850 on CO2 — and even the IPCC doesn't do that — the only logical wish for our planet is «give me more of that» — let's add more CO2 in the air — and if we're lucky we'll get more nighttime warming, and more greening of our pla
Even if you blame ALL the
warming since 1850 on CO2 — and
even the IPCC doesn't do that — the only logical wish for our planet is «give me more of that» — let's add more CO2 in the air — and if we're lucky we'll get more nighttime warming, and more greening of our pla
even the IPCC doesn't do that — the only logical wish for our
planet is «give me more of that» — let's add more CO2 in the air — and if we're lucky we'll get more nighttime
warming, and more greening of our
planet.
But coal is not «cheap» for the Appalachian communities destroyed by mountaintop removal (see appvoices.org), nor for the miners killed or sickened because worker safety would be too costly for mine owners, nor for the areas made permanently dead from the mining practices, nor for the children poisoned by the toxic fumes of
even the cleanest - burning coal plants, not to mention the entire
planet, every species, every community, every neighborhood being damaged and degraded by the global
warming coal burning causes.
Heck, we're doing such a great job at
warming the
planet, we don't
even need sunspots to do it.
A
warm planet means a wet, productive, flourishing
planet and if its
warm due to CO2 it means an
even more flourishing
planet with less violent weather.
We have those who say that this just gives more ammo to the denialists, who will (correctly) point out that our own science is telling us that we can't prevent the
warming (of course, more
warming is
even worse, but that would be the NEXT conversation after this one); we have philosophers telling us that the
planet has a fever and we are the infection which caused it; we have many, many more who continue to insist that maybe NOW we will finally undertake drastic emissions reductions.
This began roughly 150 years ago and, with the exception of a few short intervals of steady (or
even very slight decreases in) temperatures, the
planet continues to
warm at an
even more rapid rate.
Therefore you would expect roughly half the
planets to be
warming and half cooling at any one time
even if there was no connection between them.
It may
even be in an obvious place I've overlooked, but I think «Which part of the
planet does «global
warming» apply to?»
Is it not also given that there is continuous change on Earth, in a lot more ways than temperature, eventually leading to the death of this
planet, it's a chaotic work in progress... perhaps it is ridiculous and short sighted to
even hope to meaningfully alter any part of the process in the long - run... it may be possible that so many other unforeseen changes in natural life conditions besides getting
warmer (or colder) are in store for us that, in hind sight we will look back and chuckle at our feeble efforts to control something so beyond man's control.
A «runaway greenhouse effect» occurs when something
warms the
planet, triggering positive feedbacks which
warm it further; however,
even this does not mean the
planet continues
warming infinitely, forever.