Sentences with phrase «warms the surface again»

The chilled water sinks and remains cold long after the sun warms the surface again.

Not exact matches

A new El Niño cycle — warmer surface waters — began last summer, which may mean that stratospheric water levels could change again.

«For the most part, Charon's surface is too warm for methane to stick, so the methane molecules that make it to Charon's surface just bounce around there until they either escape back to space again or find a place cold enough to stick,» Grundy said.

It bears stating again that the expected amplification has nothing to do with the greenhouse effect — it is just a function of the surface warming.

Once again, surface warming variability diminishes even further in the late 20th century simulations, and once again these late 20th century simulations are much closer to the observed trends of sea surface warming, than the control and early 20th century simulations.

If the recent «slowdown» in global surface warming is reversing, the stronger land carbon sink seen in recent years may weaken again, and the rise in CO2 may quicken again.

There doesn't seem to be a secret that needs uncovering: when I ask what prompted him to move from the lush, textured surfaces of the paintings he produced in the 90s — canvases that seem to have a warm bloom across them like a beautiful mould — to the flatter, looser, more painterly style he employs today, once again, he has no complex rationale.

The increase in water vapour as the surface warms is key, but so might be changes in boundary layer stability, rossby wave generation via longitudinally varying responses at the surface, impacts of the stratopshere on the steering of the jet, and the situation is completely different again for tropical storms.

[Response: Depends again — the upper troposphere is predicted to warm more than the surface — at least in the tropics.

And once again, if all this is right, we should not expect immediate evidence of global warming in measurements of surface temperatures.

Every now and again, the myth that «we shouldn't believe global warming predictions now, because in the 1970's they were predicting an ice age and / or cooling» surfaces.

In general, the regions of expanding warming upwelling water in the Indian Ocean, North Pacific, or wherever they are, must create slight bulges in the surface, and the regions of shrinking, cooling, sinking water in the Arctic must create slight depressions in the sea surface (again, I mean in a very low pass sense — obviously storms, tides, etc, create all kinds of short - terms signals obscuring this).

Once again under the widening impact of this full hour of extra solar radiation, global mean surface temperatures began to warm.

Water at the surface that is below the equilibrium temperature will be warmed mainly radiatively until it warms up again.

Thus one might expect larger hurricanes to extend the interval between hurricanes over the patches of ocean that spawn them, because they don't spawn until the sea surface warms sufficiently again.

Re 346 ziarra, again: «The radiation from a cooler upper atmosphere can warm the surface because it counteracts the even greater amount of radiation in the other direction, thus reducing the net flow of heat.»

And that reality has been demonstrated over and over again, most recently in the work of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project, led by Dr. Richard Muller, who began his comprehensive assessment as an avowed climate skeptic and ended it convinced by the clear evidence that global warming is happening and is caused by human activity.This conclusion is emphatically shared by the best and brightest of the global scientific community, including our own National Academy of Sciences.

But again, I have to ask a question that you have not answered: How does the heat trapped by CO2 at the surface skin warm the subsurface ocean waters since it is widely acknowledged that the infrared heat from CO2 can't penetrate into the ocean itself?

50 % is instantly radiated downward, hits the surface which warms and instantly radiates out from the surface again back to space.

Even scientists like Gavin Schmidt and Judith Curry were almost as quick as me to recognize that ocean surface warming, once diluted into the much larger basin, can never again spontaneously concentrate in the surface layer.

We can therefore again compare the Scenario A2 multi-model global surface warming projections to the observed warming, in this case since 2000, when the AR4 model simulations began (Figure 9).

A warm Pacific surface to 1944, cool to 1976 and warm again to 1998.

«Warming, if it resumes again after the 18 - 26 year «pause» in global surface temperatures, tending to decrease the temperature differences or gradients between the equator and the poles...»

The band of TSI in which the switch from warming to cooling and back again is a variation of less than 4 Watts per square metre of heat arriving at the Earth's surface.

It's not really to do with photons emitted by the surface at first, it is just more photons emitted by the atmosphere with more GHGs, making a larger downward IR flux changing the energy balance at the surface until it warms up enough to emit more and balance it again.

Although the surface is now cooler again, the skies are also clear which again allows more sun through to warm the seas which produces more water vapour which rises to form clouds, and so on and so on.

''... worked with two sediment cores they extracted from the seabed of the eastern Norwegian Sea, developing a 1000 - year proxy temperature record «based on measurements of δ18O in Neogloboquadrina pachyderma, a planktonic foraminifer that calcifies at relatively shallow depths within the Atlantic waters of the eastern Norwegian Sea during late summer,» which they compared with the temporal histories of various proxies of concomitant solar activity... This work revealed, as the seven scientists describe it, that «the lowest isotope values (highest temperatures) of the last millennium are seen ~ 1100 - 1300 A.D., during the Medieval Climate Anomaly, and again after ~ 1950 A.D.» In between these two warm intervals, of course, were the colder temperatures of the Little Ice Age, when oscillatory thermal minima occurred at the times of the Dalton, Maunder, Sporer and Wolf solar minima, such that the δ18O proxy record of near - surface water temperature was found to be «robustly and near - synchronously correlated with various proxies of solar variability spanning the last millennium,» with decade - to century - scale temperature variability of 1 to 2 °C magnitude.»

Now, add a source at greater than 15C (like a warm earth surface) and ad long as the rate of incoming 15 um radiation is greater than the 15 um radiation rate you already measured from your hohlraum there will be disequilibrium and the temperature of the hohlraum (not just the CO2 but all of the gas) will increase until the hohlraum is again emitting the same amount of 15 um radiation as is coming in.

Claims of rapid, accelerating, dangerous and unequivocal global warming from CO2 and other greenhouse gases means that should be happening... especially for the oceans that represent about 72 % of the Earth's surface... yet the latest empirical evidence shows the above adjectives are big fat lies when it comes to this gigantic thermal sink... Ooops... those stubborn facts strike again...

Turbulent deep ocean flows surface and set up wind and current responses that again extend the cold tongue and piles warm surface water up against Australia and Indonesia.

The journal Science, which is peer reviewed up the wazoo, has an interesting new study purporting to explain the 17 - year «pause» in global warming, and, indeed, predicting how long it's likely to continue: The «pause» in global warming may last another decade before surface temperatures start rising again, according to scientists.

And once again we're using the model mean because it represents the forced component of the climate models; that is, if the forcings used by the climate models were what caused the surfaces of the oceans to warm, the model mean best represents how the ocean surfaces would warm in response to those forcings.

A given location on the equator of Venus cools by about 5 degrees during its 4 - month - long night, and so Venus could have cooled right down if the Sun were not shining during its daytime and warming the troposphere and the surface back up again by the same 5 degrees, or whatever it is.

They expect it's plausable that the «hiatus» in warming surface temperatures will last another decade, after which atmospheric temperatures are likely to rise quickly again.

This unbalance results in the entire atmosphere warming until the outgoing again matches incoming solar radiation, and this results in the surface temperature increasing.

Soon the eastern trade winds start pushing the warm tropical surface waters and their associated thunderstorms and clouds to the west across the Pacific and eventually poleward again.

In fact, the lower - tropospheric temperatures warm at a slightly greater rate over North America (about 0.28 °C / decade using satellite data) than do the surface temperatures (0.27 °C / decade), although again the difference is not statistically significant.

A study published Wednesday in Science Advances confirms once again that there was no global warming hiatus or cooling period during the past 20 years, an idea that had previously been raised in earlier assessments of sea surface temperature data.

, but now that the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Project folks have worked over the temperature data again, there's no more cause for skepticism about whether or not the globe has warmed.

In the meantime, Levitus et al. have once again reminded us that although the surface warming may have been dampened in recent years, global warming hasn't magically vanished, and that heat stored in the oceans will eventually come back to haunt us.

You have proven time and time again that CO2 warming of oceans is a MYTH, backed by anti-science and your monumental ignorance of the effect of a SW on water surfaces.

The Berkeley earth surface temperature project (BEST) also confirm that one third of the Globes weather stations show a cooling, not warming, signal again demonstrating that no single global climate prevails.

Our full atmosphere of real greenhouse gases, which are not ideal gases but have volume, weight, attraction and subject to gravity, act as a blanket weighing down a ton per square foot around the Earth keeping the heat from the Sun's warming of the Earth from escaping too quickly before the Sun again heats the surface.

If I switch on the sun again, I get warming of the atmosphere and the surface.

There's an objection you haven't addressed yet — that if extra heat tried to build up near the surface, convection would immediately carry it away again because warm air rises.

Again correct, but absolutely no evidence against the ability of downwelling radiation from the Atmosphere to the Surface to cause the Surface to be warmer than it would be absent the «greenhouse gases».

So far, none of our experts out here in WUWT land — or anywhere else I have looked have made what I can call «a good job of explaining» as to how it is possible for energy that is transported away from the surface and back again via GHGs manages to warm the surface.

(By the way, neither has sea - level rise due to thermal expansion, because the thermal expansion coefficient is several times larger for warm surface waters than for the cold deep waters — again it is warming in the surface layers that counts, while the total ocean heat content tells us little about the amount of sea - level rise.)

This lack comes up again and again in therapy, at the root of childhoods that on the surface of it were fine, with no abuse and no deprivation, yet lacking that deep, warm connection that can best be described as feeling safe — safe in that loving connection whatever you do, and not worried about losing it if you do something «wrong».