If the victim proves a defect or a failure to
warn by a preponderance of the evidence, the manufacturer is automatically liable for both economic damages, such as medical bills, and noneconomic damages, such as loss of enjoyment in life.
Subsequently, many courts have interpreted Wyeth as affirmatively holding both that the burden in such a case is on the defendant to prove the FDA would have rejected the
warning advocated
by the plaintiff, and that the standard
by which this must be shown is an «exacting» one beyond the normal
preponderance -
of - the -
evidence standard.