maybe there
was an altitude issue.
I live in NJ, btw, so I don't know if
it was an altitude issue...?
Not exact matches
Firstly, I live in Denver (originally from Montreal) so
altitude could have
been an
issue.
We live in a high
altitude area and wondered if this may
be the
issue.
I always worry about
altitude up here at 7500 ′ but it wasn't an
issue with this recipe.
Though it
is 3400m above sea level and many people get
altitude sickness here, we had no
issues since by the time we reached it we
were fully acclimatized.
I wanted to share my high -
altitude hack since I've had
issues baking things before at 7000 ft. I put the baking pan in the oven while it
was pre-heating.
The three things I worry about
are the
altitude (people die of
altitude sickness), the bugs (I've heard that 100 % Deet won't stop them) and the general consensus that most people suffer stomach
issues (it
's very rare that I have stomach problems when I travel but hiking with digestive troubles sounds like a nightmare).
I
am so excited to try this recipe as its simple, and sounds deeeeelish with all my favs together... im thinkin how tasty theyll
be with some sweetened coconut flales and a tad less sugaah However, i
am in high
altitude (Rocky - road - Mountains) & have had numerous
issues and let down withcsinking muffins!!!
Altitude IS an
issue on airplanes - see Boeing 787...
If the
issue is respiratory or due to
altitude, we do carry at least one tank of oxygen on the trek that you will have access to.
If the
issue is respiratory or due to
altitude, we do carry at least one tank of oxygen on trek that you will have access to.
Yes,
altitude is an
issue but if you plan your trip correctly and take it easy then it
is manageable.
Travelers with medical conditions, such as heart disease, lung disease, high blood pressure, sickle cell disease, or women who may
be pregnant, should
be advised to consult a physician familiar with high -
altitude medical
issues before traveling to high
altitude areas.
Pixelation does become an
issue at low
altitudes, and the explosion effects aren't exactly the most realistic we've seen.
I don't think this
issue is like a «SST bucket adjustment» or a TOBS adjustment or an adjustment for lapse rate due to
altitude change.
I
'm no atmospheric scientist and haven't really considered the stratospheric cooling
issue but, if an increase in the amount of atmospheric CO2 raised the average
altitude from which the stratosphere receives radiation in the CO2 bands, wouldn't it receive less radiation in those bands?
Perhaps this isn't an
issue because it would take an impossibly large amount of CO2 [and water vapour] for the emission
altitude to reach the tropopause, but it
's an aspect of this sort of explanation that I haven't
been able to work out in my head.
While we know that treeline can
be climatically «elastic» in the space of both latitude and
altitude, i.e., moving north and south and up and down with topography, this paper raises important
issues about rates of ecological adaption, rates that
are being tested by contemporary rates of change forced by human activities.
Of course as you know, there
is a solution to the
issue of using a consistent
altitude throughout the network.
And then there
's altitude, proximity to the coast, how exposed a given site
is, or to what extent adjacent structures cast shadows — a particular
issue in urban areas of course — and the urban heat island effect.
Also providing support to CRF
is Professor Paul Beckwith who has expertise on high -
altitude atmospheric jet stream
issues.
I
'm unsure, but this seems analogous to the ice sheet
issue — for example, under what climate regime would tropical high -
altitude glaciers re-form?
The second
issue is far more complex, namely the inter-relationship with other gases in the atmosphere and what effect it may have on the rate of convection at various
altitudes and / or whether convection effectively outstrips any «heat trapping» effect of CO2 carrying the warmer air away and upwards to the upper atmosphere where the «heat»
is radiated to space.