If an empirical 95 % CI did not include zero, the indirect effect
was significant at the 0.05 level.
Skewness
was significant at − 2.06 with a standard error of 0.31.
Specifically, ADHD symptoms were not associated with social problems among adolescents who reported low levels of depressive symptoms, but the association between ADHD symptoms and social problems
was significant at higher levels of depression.
There was no significant relationship between poverty duration and being overweight for the child cohort despite the same percentage point difference (although the relationship
was significant at the 10 per cent confidence level).
Following the a priori tests, we considered relaxing the equality constraints on the relations of other wave 1 predictors with both latent constructs, starting with the predictor that resulted in the greatest improvement of fit provided the modification index indicated the improvement
was significant at a more stringent p level of.001 or less.
We were able to estimate a stable model, though, by constraining ORs for particular types / numbers of disorders to be the same in predicting both planned and unplanned attempts unless the interaction of the predictor with plans in the pooled model
was significant at the α level of.05 and had an estimated variance inflation factor (a diagnostic test suggesting that a regression coefficient might be affected by multicollinearity) of less than 10.0.
And the potential for conflicts
was significant at law firms.
Current warming is so fast that reconstructions are pushed to their limits... what?!?!? And this supposed unprecedented warming wasn't significant locally / regionally from 1980 - end of 2004, at least not enough to be captured by proxies... but, of course, operate under the assumption that all warming in the past
was significant at the local / regional level and therefore captured by the proxies.
This trend
was significant at the P < 0.05 level.
For example, I'd say there were some group exhibitions that were important because of the context — being identified with a particular approach
was significant at one stage, being able to reach a wider audience at another, or having the opportunity to develop work for a specific site or venue.
Activation of the caudate cluster (CD)
was significant at p < 0.05 after correcting for FDR over the search volume of the ventral brain from olfactory bulb to internal capsule (p < 0.01 height and cluster extent > 6).
When the datasets of both dogs were combined by spatial warping, activation of the caudate cluster
was significant at p < 0.05 after correcting for FDR over the search volume of the ventral brain from olfactory bulb to internal capsule (p < 0.01 height and cluster extent > 6).
But we can say that tablets still haven't beaten the printed book: the difference between Kindle and the book
was significant at the p <.01 level, and the difference between iPad and the book was marginally significant at p =.06.
tablets still haven't beaten the printed book: the difference between Kindle and the book
was significant at the p <.01 level, and the difference between iPad and the book was marginally significant at p =.06.
A t - test showed the difference in confidence between the two groups
was significant at the midpoint check, t (39) = 2.0842, p =.04.
This gain
was significant at 5 times the margin of error.
When a food challenge × time interaction
was significant at P < 0.05, multiple comparisons at each time point were carried out with the use of the Tukey - Kramer method.
The appointments
are significant at a time when more and more companies are coming under fire for their lack of board diversity.
What those figures exhibit is that Koscielny has remained consistent and improved steadily, especially in the tackling department, adding almost 1 extra successful tackle per game, which
is significant at this level in a season when the league's general level of defending has arguably deteriorated.
If the coefficient of the attribute was found to
be significant at the 5 % level then it could be assumed with relative certainty (95 %) that respondents considered it to be important.
Differences were considered to
be significant at p < 0.05.
Differences between high - and low - GI meals
were significant at 4 h (the time point of interest) for all 3 outcomes by using paired t tests.
A high quality, isolated silver product is oligodynamic, as an example, because its effectiveness
is significant at low concentrations.
[4 marks] 2 1 What is meant by «the results
were significant at p 2 2 Briefly explain one method the psychologist could use to check the validity of the data she collected in this study.
Three out of eight schools have initial offer follow - up differentials significant at the 0.05 level, and one of
these is significant at the 0.01 level.
In a school - by - school attrition analysis using the ever - offer instrument, two schools have marginally significant follow - up differentials of 5 — 7 %, though only one
is significant at the 0.05 level.
Overall, year 1 results on MacMillan for kindergarten students with lower reading scores demonstrated a significant difference of.000; for first grade overall results were not significant; second grade results
were significant at.000; and third grade results
were significant at.042.
Year 2 results were not included for kindergarten; however, all subtests for students with lower abilities were significant, with the exception of spatial abilities.First grade overall test results were significant for the low groups at.000; second grade results
were significant at.001; and third grade results were higher overall for students with lower abilities.
All differences shown
are significant at 10 percent level or better.
All differences reported
are significant at the 0.05 level with appropriate adjustments for multiple comparisons.
In the same way, big publishers need big blockbusters to pay the bills whereas indies can have more freedom to make smaller budget films that make smaller amounts of income — which may still
be significant at the individual level.
The t - stats of all five momentum strategies implemented in small caps
are significant at the 1 % level compared to only two of the five strategies being significant at the 10 % level when implemented in large caps.
This compares to two of the same strategies implemented in the large - cap universe
being significant at the 5 % level, and one at the 10 % level.
The t - stats of two of the long — short value strategies implemented in small caps
are significant at the 1 % level, and one is significant at the 5 % level.
Except for the t - statistic on the 10 - year Treasury yield, the other regressors have t - statistics that
are significant at a 95 % level.
All of the smart beta correlations have the «right» (i.e., negative) sign, suggesting that lower valuation is good for future returns; 65 of 96
are significant at a 5 % level, with almost half (45 of the tests) significant at the 1 % level.
Almost all of the factors and smart beta strategies exhibit a negative relationship between starting valuation and subsequent performance whether we use the aggregate measure or P / B to define relative valuation.9 Out of 192 tests shown here, not a single test has the «wrong» sign: in every case, the cheaper the factor or strategy gets, relative to its historical average, the more likely it is to deliver positive performance.10 For most factors and strategies (two - thirds of the 192 tests) the relationship holds with statistical significance for horizons ranging from one month to five years and using both valuation measures (44 % of these results
are significant at the 1 % level).
Two - thirds of the 192 results are statistically significant, and as with the U.S. results, over 40 %
are significant at the 1 % level, despite a far shorter non-U.S. history.
For Model 4, the improvement in MSE is statistically significant only at the 10 % confidence level, and for Model 5 the improvement
is significant at more than a 1 % confidence level.
Even though they may not seem to
be significant at first, ignoring these additional costs may make your budget planning go haywire and cause you financial problems down the road.
In the case of the Platinum Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Card from American Express, that annual fee
is significant at $ 195 but if travel is a regular part of your business that fee would likely be offset with all the rewards - earning opportunities and flexible redemption options.
When ranked in order of explained variance, the tenth one down then defines the 99 % confidence level: i.e. if your real PC explains more of the variance than 99 % of the random PCs, then you can say that
this is significant at the 99 % level.
«The correlation of the solar indices and modeled solar irradiance with the Earth's temperature
are significant at better than 99 % confidence level.»
Is this significant at the 95 % level?
I have already made it clear elsewhere that the additional resistor effect of human CO2 would be insignificant in relation to that from the rest of the air and the oceans together with the varying solar and oceanic heating and cooling effects but we still need to know for sure whether
it is significant at all over periods of less than several hundred years because that may be the time we need to solve our energy, pollution, resource and population problems.
It was proved to
be significant at almost all cases, ranging from 20 % to 55 % for GCAM and from 10 % to 45 % for SWIF during storm days.
Although strong winter warming in the Peninsula region (Turner et al. 2005) and over West Antarctica has been a focus of other studies (Steig et al. 2009; Ding et al. 2010), we found that winter trends in West Antarctica have not been statistically since 1979 (Table 3), though
they are significant at Faraday / Vernadsky.
This reduction in trend
is significant at better than the 95 % CL.
Stippling indicates where the sea ice or temperature trends
are significant at the 95 % level.
For HadCRUT, CRUTEMP and NCDC, these changes
are significant at better than the 95 % CL, and for GISTEMP and HadCRUT + C&W, they are better than the 90 % CL.