He's the best thing to
watch in the film because he's scary, but also because he offers something different.
Not exact matches
In one study, people
watched a silent
film about an accident at an industrial site that occurred
because of poor safety practices.
I don't always talk to my pastor about movies I plan on
watching, mostly
because being a
film critic prevents me from having much choice
in the first place to a degree.
In my family we never have a «proper» breakfast
because we're too busy with presents and
watching films on TV.
I give this movie 2 stars, only
because its got alot of actual football highlights
in it so you can at least multitask and grind a little
film while your
watching it.
The conclusions seemed clear:
watching unchecked aggression
in real life, on
film or
in cartoons makes us more aggressive
because it provides us with «social scripts» to guide our behavior.
Bullet to the Head is a wasted opportunity to make something quite interesting and worth your time, but instead it just takes bits and pieces to create something that
in the end is not worth
watching because the
film lacks a good story, effective action and more importantly good performances and interesting characters.
The point is that, yakuza
films have always been a topic that I'm always interested
in watching because, as I see it, it's almost impossible to tell a movie
in these setting with these types of characters.
This is good,
because there's nothing else to
watch or care about
in the entire
film anyway.
I
watched this
film because it came off a list of Universal International Pictures, I started
watching in 1949 time frame.
I always fall directly
in the middle when I
watch this
film,
because the comedy hits just as much as it misses.
The
film is hilarious, if viewed
in context, but of course having
watched it dozens and dozens of times since my first viewing
in the early 1960's
in an «art cinema»
in Greenwich village, I no longer laugh out loud, but enjoy my silent amusement,
because I love satire.
It's funny
because I was
watching the movie and we had ads for other
films and I said, «Why don't we put our own movies
in here?»
Watching their passion-less present day story unfold was riveting, primarily
because it's so refreshing to see a story like this
in a
film.
Stewart plays out the
film as if it were a traditional «haunted house»
film, but
because we already know it is about alien life, we merely
watch the characters go through predictable motions until the story catches up with what we already surmise, and the only things keeping viewers reeled
in are basic questions such as, «why are they doing this?»
It's a good thing the dialogue and acting deliver, too,
because the
film is glacially paced and clocks
in at a way - too - long 132 minutes that feels like a DVD director's cut that you'd
watch once before always returning to the theatrical cut.
But I thought a lot about the 1979
film while
watching Ready Player One, and not only
because Alan Silvestri's score deliberately quotes John Williams's bombastic military march from the earlier
film (one of hundreds of hidden nuggets
in a
film that is quite literally an Easter egg hunt).
That's certainly not the fault of the two young actors playing Jeannette as a child,
because the main reason the movie work is the groundwork laid by Chandler Head and Ella Anderson
in the
film's flashbacks, which depict a wonderful relationship between father and daughter that's simply heartbreaking to
watch deteriorate.
- Amour was very well - made and acted but
because watching the content of the
film was so excruciating for me, i can't seem to put it
in a «best» list.
I have
watched a few
films that are fairly awful, but save themselves
because of the uplifting sensation
in your chest, as the
film closes.
Nonetheless, I was hollering out loud for this
film and I wasn't alone either, if people compare this to «Ted», they are going to be disappointed
because they are two very different
films but if you look as a stand alone you will have a blast
watching «A Million Ways to Die
in the West».
But things feel malformed from the off, which begins with a lot of people saying a lot of portentous things, and continues to the assassination itself, which is more than underwhelming,
in part
because of what seems to be a pretty tight budget — Landesman
watches Giamatti as he
films the shooting, but there doesn't seem to be anyone else
in Dealey Plaza except him.
The Squid and the Whale is a sometimes difficult
film to
watch, but that's only
because it is often frank and honest
in its portrayal of four very confused, somewhat maladjusted people.
I'm not going to
watch this trailer
because I'm seeing this
film on Saturday and I want to go
in completely fresh.
It's a tough
film to
watch, both
because of its subject matter — a seventeen - year - old girl is tasked with rearing her younger brother and sister while trying to hunt down her drug - dealing father
in order to keep her family intact — and
because it's just a slow
film.
And now I worry that all the hype will actually deter some people from seeing the
film,
because when does one ever get
in the mood to
watch a
film I personally described as «sobering and immensely difficult to
watch»?
I haven't
watched The Oscars
in many years
because I usually don't see a lot of the nominated
films, but WOW!
My favorite horror
film is The Ring
because I was legitimately very scared when I was
watching it for the first time
in a movie theater.
Possibly it was hated for offering little
in the way of hope (and
in places explicitly denying the audience hope), or
because at times you get the feeling the director is judging the audience for
watching his
film.
Rather, I had to mention it simply
because it has come up recently
in our Movies We
Watched column and sparked some rather heated debate among R3ers over on Letterboxd, and if you've been left out of all that
because you haven't seen the
film, here's your chance to rectify that.
They passed over outstanding works like Elizabeth Olsen
in Martha Marcy May Marlene, Juliette Binoche
in Certified Copy, and Adepero Oduye
in Pariah
because either their
films were «too small» or «too foreign» or «too uncomfortable» or is it simply, they don't
watch movies that there buddy friends aren't
in?
Hopefully the reason people will
watch this is
because you'll be teasing their interest
in watching the
film.
Below you can check out the latest UK Quad and a couple of extra still
because you've been so good this year.I mistakenly thought the
film was called «End Of
Watches» which made me think it was a film set in the not - so - distant future, where people had become so used to clocks on their phones and Ipods, that watches were no longer
Watches» which made me think it was a
film set
in the not - so - distant future, where people had become so used to clocks on their phones and Ipods, that
watches were no longer
watches were no longer needed.
This is a fun
film simply
because you
watch it
in complete disbelief.
The 1948
film remains a hugely popular
watch among the Monster Kid crowd and horror movie aficionados, primarily
because it prominently features not only Frankenstein's Monster (played by Glenn Strange, not Boris Karloff as many mistakenly believe), but Dracula (Bela Lugosi, returning to the role that made him famous one last time) and The Wolf Man (Lon Chaney Jr. also returning for one more growl
in arguably his most famous role, though he was a versatile horror star playing The Mummy, Frankenstein's Monster, and Dracula too!)
These moments
in the
film are the most difficult to
watch but they only really work
because we are allowed the time to bond with the characters beforehand and experience the combat with them.
I'm extra-glad I didn't
watch any of the trailers or clips that were released before the movie was finished (apparently),
because of the expectations they would have created — not only glimpses of what's
in the
film, but quite a few things that aren't.
Of course,
because the whole thing was shot
in one take, we're
watching her performance occur
in real time too, and the various colors the
film cycles through (which can strain the strictest believability, to be honest) give her so many different notes to play.
I am sure I am not alone
in that I spend far more time
watching abstract
films and short experimental videos than I do
watching feature
films;
in part
because I make experimental
films, and
in part
because, to my mind, the most risk - taking visual artists don't necessarily work
in feature
films; but instead work
in video art and experimental filmmaking and newly emerging filmic art forms, such as gifs.
He's great
in all of them, though I think his Magic Mike performance is a little overblown, and is specifically wonderful
in Killer Joe, a
film I almost didn't
watch specifically
because of McConaughey's involvement.
K - 19: The Widomaker is a good action
film, much overlooked here
in the United States, probably
because we aren't used to
watching films with Russian heroes, and are especially skeptical with American and British actors portraying them.
Just don't
watch both versions of the
film in quick succession,
because it's not a ride you need to go on twice.
Vividly re-imagined, the new Ben - Hur is a lot of fun to
watch,
in part
because it follows the outline of William Wyler's famed
film while injecting fresh new elements.
Maybe it's
because, I work
in the IT
film but this show is a blast to
watch.
Underworld is such a tedious
watch, not only
because it is inherently superficial
in everything it does, but it also is one of the more repetitive
films to cover this oft - explored territory.
I tried to think like a Yahoo! commenter while
watching Coogler's
film because I felt like the message of the
film was already speaking to my choir and I wanted to consider how filmmakers and artists can reach beyond the echo chamber to try and change some minds about the issue of race
in contemporary America.
But the
film works
because it doesn't come off as empty provocation; every maddening choice evolves
in ways viewers can understand, even if they're grimacing as they
watch.
Watching Del Toro's
films is a pleasure
because his vision is evident
in every frame.
I ended up seeing it three more times while it was still
in theatres
because it brought back the same feelings plus new ones from having
watched the
film from an adult perspective.
I was absolutely looking forward to the screening
because of it, but I sat
in my seat
watching in the
film and was just bored.