Sentences with phrase «watched more often»

Short videos get watched more often, so keep your video under three minutes.

It reads: «Today television news is watched more often than people read newspapers, than people listen to the radio, than people read or gather any other form of communication.

Just like bracelets, I don't really wear them all that often but when I wear one, I always think I should wear a watch more often since it's nice to see what time it is on a watch instead of getting out my iPhone.

Not exact matches

Audiences» changing viewing habits are likely one reason for the declining ratings for live award shows like the Oscars, as more and more people cut ties with the cable packages that are often required to watch such programs either on TV or online.

Grandmothers who watched their grandchildren one day a week did better on cognitive tests than those who cared for grandchildren more often or not at all.

They will be watching more closely from now on, because lightning doesn't often strike twice in the same place.

My sense is watching octogenarians age, there's 99 % more often doom and gloomers as an essence overcomes them and their world head - view is increasingly doomed, even the most seemingly vital.»

I have actually found that smaller churches are often more effective in caring for orphans before a watching world than larger churches are.

«It is pathetic to read and watch the way the Christian faith is often attacked by some folks in the media and academia relentlessly» Do you mean the say way that those who aren't on board with Christians or any other religion one chooses not to follow is deemed lesser a person and more than often chastised for not being like you?

From a national population sample, the poll found that those who watch religious television programs compared to those who don't watch religious television programs are more likely to have had a conversion experience, to believe that the bible is free of mistakes, to believe in a personal devil, to read the bible more often, to talk to others about their faith more often, to attend church services more frequently, and to hold to or engage in beliefs and practices characteristic of evangelicals as a whole.

People who watch lots of movies about murder and violence, often become more violent.

Green tomatoes end up in the compost or the trash more often than not, and that sucks, because there are tons of things you can do with them — oven - fry them, pickle them, watch movies about them... or if you're like me, make cocktails with them.

Sleep is one of the things we often neglect, and I have to say it is the thing I put more emphasis on than anything in obtaining good health there is no competition for staying up and watching another mindless TV program or surfing the net until your eyes are hanging out of your head.

Yes — go win the ball back, but jeez watch how you tackle son... he's more often than not a «Red Card Waiting To Happen».

It was noted by the referees watching that their more visible team shape and willingness to back each other up or offer an option more frequently than opponents quite often made the difference in harder games.

Jose's arrogance and Abramovich's willingness to spend makes perfect match.And look how they pick their players: they watching targets of big clubs (often Arsenal) and then offer more money.Or they get bullies like Diego Costa.And, we can't even compare styles: one is a machine while the other one's is gracious beauty.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Although sissokho is more of a box to box but he has athleticism and physical presence to affect the game and often plays well against big teams when ever I watch him e.g Chelsea this season and last two seasons against Man united last season at old traffold etc he can play DM role for us and will be a good signing and very useful in champions league... COYG!!

No analyst can possibly watch every team in the nation play, meaning that often time a team's ranking is based on little more than reputation.

Officially, it sat upwards of 4,000, but often more than 7,000 would pack into the place to watch the sport.

Many bettors struggle with this betting philosophy, because they want to watch their bet win more often than not.

Secondly, Wenger needs to become far more flexible when it comes to his formation selections... remember this is the same individual that hadn't used a 3 - back system for 20 years and only conceded to the experiment when the proverbial shit hit the fan... you know it killed him to adopt «Conte's» system, which is probably why he resisted so long; in fact his stubbornness to adjust even earlier might have cost us the 4 hole... much like most sports that have tactical formations, every team should have a «base» offensive and defensive scheme, but they likewise need to have some inherent flexibility depending on the opposing teams tactics and / or when specific substitutions are made... how many times have you watched a Wenger - run team make a late substitution but not change their shape on the pitch... furthermore, how many times have you seen our team fail to make the necessary adjustments at halftime due to Wenger's tactical stubbronness, which often led to giving up goals in the early minutes of the second - half... the best teams in the world know how to make halftime adjustments whereas we always seem to be surprised when the opposing team throws a wrinkle into the mix following halftime... this my friend is soccer 101

Perhaps it occurs more often than we think and everyone else is smart enough to make sure their watches are on the same wrist.

They're a blast to watch and I wish they were on the bigger channels more often

Or need to drink heavily and more often to watch this team.

If you watch the saints play you will not believe that wanysma is a dm because he is found on the edge of opposition box more often.

Attitude matters more than talent, if you haven't learned that then you don't watch PL that often or you're a WOB bandwagonner.

Your not watching Arsenal I'm afriad to say, we haven't been playing a player in that «number 10 role» that often this season, we have gone to more of a 4141 formation and we have been using 2 B2B CM infront of a holding CM, not ACM!

It's painful and often embarrassing watching us cave into the bigger more powerful teams...

There is a reason Poldi was not played more often and anyone watching him could tell you it.

But with Guardiola, the results often feel like they're secondary; it's more fun to just watch him try.

Though more often than not these days I would rather be watching Sunday leaguers slogging it out down at the local park for little more than the joy of the game and competition, I found myself fixated, along with millions of other world citizens, at the unfolding spectacle that is, and has become, El Clasico.

One or both of us needs to go back and watch the last quarter of that match, because to me we didn't look especially dangerous at all (of course with so much possession you're bound to have one or two half - chances, and sometimes they'll go in, but more often they won't (hence the term, «half chance»)-RRB-.

A frequent frustration when watching him at Chelsea was that he simply didn't shoot often enough; he averaged a goal every three appearances but could easily have brought that closer to one in two if he was more willing to use the dangerous shot he has in his weaponry.

In his first two seasons at the club, he took numerous shots like these and it would be so frustrating to watch those scuff along the ground either into the hands of the goalie or more often than not, wide of the target.

I wrote some school lunch tips for parents based on my 7 years watching elementary - aged kids eat (or, more often, not eat) their lunches: http://www.eco-novice.com/2013/09/school-lunch-tips-from-former-teacher.html

We even made a special effort to leave laptops and phones turned off and watched a movie together, which is definitely something we need to do more often.

No more watching the clock during a feed or worrying your baby is feeding too often.

Watch for signs of distress (whining more than normal, upset more often, etc...) to see if you are weaning too fast.

You will have to start watching the child more often because he or she will start running into coffee tables and cabinets.

And I felt like it was received very, very well because I wasn't like «Why don't you watch your kids more often», you know, it wasn't a condemnation, it was more like «Kids will be kids and you are more than welcome to try this out if it works for you» but I just felt it was a good way to kind of cushion everything.

Looks from strangers at the market are more often of concern than of excitement, as they watch you tossing a bag of crackers at your toddler while you try to bend down to grab the keys you dropped, which no one, by the way, is offering to grab for you.

While it can be terrifying for new parents to watch their baby in pain or sick, more often than not, the problems are easily explained and easily cleared up.

More often than not, the name you eventually choose for your little bundle pops into your head after watching a movie or tv show...

Parents often complain that their kids watch too much TV and spend too much time in front of screens, all the while giving them more and more access to these devices.

And since I eat cake more often than I should and shop diligently online late at night when no one is watching, I don't need extra calories or presents.

Your baby can't tell you if she feels sick, so watch for signs like sleeping more often than usual, being less alert when awake, feeding less or refusing to feed, being unusually fussy, and crying more often.

Smokers told that they had high self - control exposed themselves to significantly more temptation than their counterparts — opting on average to watch the movie while holding a cigarette — and they failed to resist lighting up three times as often as those told they had low self - control.

«They do a lot of the hard slogging in surveys like this one, staying up all night to watch stars that, more often than not, turn out not to have planets.»

What is more, birds with no experience stealing from hidden reserves belonging to other birds moved their food supply significantly less often than did thieving birds, regardless of whether they were watched.