On Earth,
water clouds absorb IR so strongly before there is any opportunity for scattering.
Not exact matches
Trees perform three major climate functions: They
absorb carbon, which they pull from the atmosphere, creating a cooling effect; their dark green leaves
absorb light from the sun, heating Earth's surface; and they draw
water from the soil, which evaporates into the atmosphere, creating low
clouds that reflect the sun's hot rays (a mechanism known as evotranspiration that also leads to cooling).
Water molecules in interstellar
clouds might
absorb enough heat to allow the
cloud to continue to collapse and form a star.
If it were possible to leave the
clouds but remove all other
water vapour from the atmosphere, only about 40 % less infrared of all frequencies would be
absorbed.
Take away the
clouds and all other greenhouses gases, however, and the
water vapour alone would still
absorb about 60 % of the infrared now
absorbed.
First, they enter the
water droplets that form
clouds, where they bathe in sunshine and
absorb the light energy.
The
cloud whales have the ability to
absorb different liquids or small objects, such as
water, oil, or nuts, which can then be dropped or shot at objects.
That doens» t affect the equilibrium increase in the upward flux at TRPP in response, though it may change how much of that is
absorbed by the stratosphere (perhaps a reduction due to shielding of
water vapor and CO2 wings in the stratosphere by increased tropospheric
water vapor (as it would by an increase in
clouds, particularly higher
clouds)-- PS feedbacks also change the baseline spectral flux in the vicinity of the CO2 band.
The convective heat / mass transfer due to
water dwarfs any radiative forcing; besides — just on optical depth alone, any re-radiated LWIR from atmospheric CO2 would be IMMEDIATELY
absorbed by the much higher concentration of
water vapor in the atmosphere (aka
clouds!)
Less well appreciated is that
clouds (made of ice particles and / or liquid
water droplets) also
absorb infrared radiation and contribute to the greenhouse effect, too.
Indeed, some wavelengths of IR can be
absorbed by both
water vapor or
clouds, or
water vapor and CO2.
If you consider that the Earth is also about 2 / 3rds
cloud covered and any CO2 or other GHG absorption would not matter because the
clouds would be
absorbing the energy anyway, over 90 % of the GHE is from
water vapor and / or
clouds and less than 10 % is from CO2 and other GHGs.
Different substances
absorb different frequencies of IR, and the different parts of the planet differ wildly in how much IR is being emitted (based as it is on surface temperature) and how much
cloud and
water vapor there is at that location (carbon dioxide is very well mixed).
Cold
water in
clouds is the nearest sink that
absorbs the CO2 that is outgassed from the surface of the ocean.
The air cools because there are no
clouds to block the rising warm air and there little
water vapor to
absorb the OLR.
Most of it is
absorbed by
clouds, carbon dioxide, and
water vapour and is then reemitted in all directions.
«The main
absorbers of infrared in the atmosphere are
water vapor and
clouds.
Certain substances in the atmosphere, chiefly
cloud droplets and
water vapor, but also carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, sulfur hexafluoride, and chlorofluorocarbons,
absorb this infrared, and re-radiate it in all directions including back to Earth.»
Trees are not only carbon - sinks, but they also perform two other climate - affecting tasks: they
absorb light into their dark leaves — causing a warming effect — and they pull
water out of the ground and into the air, creating low
clouds that promote cooling.
Clouds do not
absorb and re radiate IR radiation;
clouds reflect this energy with a reflection coefficient of.3 at each
water air interface which is why
clouds can prevent over 99 % of the energy impinging on them from escaping into space.
[1] Greenhouse gases, which include
water vapor, carbon dioxide and methane, warm the atmosphere by efficiently
absorbing thermal infrared radiation emitted by the Earth's surface, by the atmosphere itself, and by
clouds.
A slight change of ocean temperature (after a delay caused by the high specific heat of
water, the annual mixing of thermocline
waters with deeper
waters in storms) ensures that rising CO2 reduces infrared
absorbing H2O vapour while slightly increasing
cloud cover (thus Earth's albedo), as evidenced by the fact that the NOAA data from 1948 - 2008 shows a fall in global humidity (not the positive feedback rise presumed by NASA's models!)
They merely trigger the condensation of
water vapour (which saturates very easily in low pressure air) into
cloud droplets which reflect back sunlight to space, rather than
absorbing infrared as
water vapour does.
Basically, Dr Ferenc Miskolczi's life as a NASA climate research scientist was made hell because he discovered that the extra
water vapour being evaporated is not having a positive - feedback (increasing the CO2 warming effect by
absorbing more infrared from the sun), instead it is going into increased
cloud cover, which reflects incoming sunlight back to space.
What is ACTUALLY happening now is that the atmospheric greenhouse effect is getting stronger; and at the same time the circulations of
water and air and heat and
cloud and so on around the globe are going on their merry chaotic way, meaning that we are going to have unpredictable short term variations while there is a continual flow of heat into the ocean from the energy imbalance between what is being emitted and what is being
absorbed.
In the real world, the
water vapour transparency window (8µm to 12 µm) may bring some reduction in the radiation of the air
absorbed by the surface with respect to the radiation of the surface
absorbed by the air; nevertheless F. Miskolczi a from hundreds of profiles (Tiros Initial Guess Retrieval) shown with line by line calculation that it is still true that the radiation of the air
absorbed by the surface equals (more or less) the radiation of the surface
absorbed by the air; and
clouds «close the window» for a quite significant part or the time.
Fortunately, as depicted in Figure 2 (orange «thermal down surface» arrow), some of this energy does stay in the atmosphere, where it is sent back toward Earth by
clouds, released by
clouds as they condense to form rain or snow, or
absorbed by atmospheric gases composed of three or more atoms, such as
water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4).
Without
water vapour,
clouds shading the surface or the current 20 % of incident solar radiation being
absorbed on the way down through the atmosphere, then nearly twice as much solar radiation would strike the surface, making it more like +5 °C.
The model also does not take into account dust and
water in the form of
clouds which both hold great quantities of CO2 and which takes it directly and quickly into the carbon life cycle at ground level and uses it up and none of this directly
absorbed solar radiation is taken into account in the model.
What this tells me is that even with different energy input (SH
absorbs more energy due to lower clear sky albedo)
clouds regulated the albedo of both hemispheres to be equal, ie
clouds actively control the surface temps, actually I should say that
water vapor actively regulates surface temps.
The shape of the CO2 band is such that, once saturated near the center over sufficiently small distances, increases in CO2 don't have much affect on the net radiative energy transfer from one layer of air to the other so long as CO2 is the only
absorbing and emitting agent — but increases in CO2 will reduce the LW cooling of the surface to space, the net LW cooling from the surface to the air, the net LW cooling of the atmosphere to space (except in the stratosphere), and in general, it will tend to reduce the net LW cooling from a warmer to cooler layer when at least one of those layers contains some other
absorbing / emitting substance (surface,
water vapor,
clouds) or is space)
However, that equilibrium state — given the changes in
water vapour,
clouds and increases in surface temperature happens to
absorb more LW than you started with.
While pollution in some areas provides nuclei for
water to condense on to form
clouds, in other places there may be soot particles, which could
absorb sunlight and cause the
cloud to burn off (evaporate) during the day, leaving less
cloud to warm the night.
Is there any likelihood a bloom of plankton (from a freshwater pulse, or fallout of a dust
cloud full of minerals, for example) would change the temperature of the surface
water (change the reflectivity, I suppose, or change how much is
absorbed by making more complicated molecules for photosynthesis)-- sufficient to make the
water mass density change, affecting whether it sinks or not?
The SGM doesn't have
clouds and even if you put in an
absorber with a different scale height like
water vapor, it's never saturated, so there are no phase changes above the surface.
There's some warming from above such as ozone
absorbing solar UV and
water vapor or
clouds absorbing solar near - infrared.
Climate models encapsulate what we know about how the Sun's rays travel through the atmosphere and how heat from the surface of the Earth gets
absorbed by
clouds,
water vapour and, of course, carbon dioxide.
«These
clouds account for the high reflectivity of Venus, but because they also reflect infrared back to the surface (unlike
water clouds, which
absorb and emit)»
Because of the different intramolecular forces between
water molecules as vapor in air,
water, and ice, the wavelengths of emission and absorption are shifted; some of the radiation from the
water / ice droplets at the top of a
cloud can escape to space because the atmosphere above it is transparent at its wavelengths, whereas the same radiation from droplets at the bottom of a
cloud will be
absorbed and re-emitted in random directions from the droplets above, including back down to the originating droplets.
«The ozone layer, the
water vapor, the
clouds, dust and aerosols attenuates it in the following way: 1368 W / m ^ 2 / 1.35 reflected by the atmosphere and Earth's surface = 1013.3 W / m ^ 2 1013.3 W / m ^ 2 / 1.20
absorbed by the atmosphere = 844.4 W / m ^ 2 From this power, the surface only
absorbs a power of 692.41 W,»
Topics that I work on or plan to work in the future include studies of: + missing aerosol species and sources, such as the primary oceanic aerosols and their importance on the remote marine atmosphere, the in -
cloud and aerosol
water aqueous formation of organic aerosols that can lead to brown carbon formation, the primary terrestrial biological particles, and the organic nitrogen + missing aerosol parameterizations, such as the effect of aerosol mixing on
cloud condensation nuclei and aerosol absorption, the semi-volatility of primary organic aerosols, the importance of in - canopy processes on natural terrestrial aerosol and aerosol precursor sources, and the mineral dust iron solubility and bioavailability + the change of aerosol burden and its spatiotemporal distribution, especially with regard to its role and importance on gas - phase chemistry via photolysis rates changes and heterogeneous reactions in the atmosphere, as well as their effect on key gas - phase species like ozone + the physical and optical properties of aerosols, which affect aerosol transport, lifetime, and light scattering and absorption, with the latter being very sensitive to the vertical distribution of
absorbing aerosols + aerosol -
cloud interactions, which include
cloud activation, the aerosol indirect effect and the impact of
clouds on aerosol removal + changes on climate and feedbacks related with all these topics In order to understand the climate system as a whole, improve the aerosol representation in the GISS ModelE2 and contribute to future IPCC climate change assessments and CMIP activities, I am also interested in understanding the importance of natural and anthropogenic aerosol changes in the atmosphere on the terrestrial biosphere, the ocean and climate.
When air rises, it cools, can
absorb less
water, and you get
clouds or rain.