This will be a surprise to many Arctic researchers who believe deep
water formation shuts down during glaciations.»
Not exact matches
That lid of low - density
water shut off the
formation of deep
water in the Atlantic.
For global warming scenarios, additional forcing comes into play: surface warming and enhanced high - latitude precipitation, which will also reduce density of northern surface
waters (an effect which alone has
shut down deep
water formation in some model experiments, e.g. Manabe and Stouffer 1993, 1994).
Modelling uncertainty currently is such that in some climate models, this amount of freshwater (without any other forcing) would
shut down deep
water formation, in some it wouldn't.
A good way to estimate the effect of the thermohaline part of the heat transport is to
shut it down by dumping a lot of freshwater into the north Atlantic in a climate model, which stops deep
water formation there.
[Response: You're talking of cold events that are a response to massive freshwater influx to the Atlantic and a subsequent
shut - down of deep
water formation.
Thus it appears that disruption of deep
water formation in the North Atlantic, via a blob of colder fresher
water coming off of Greenland, would not «
shut down» or even affect the Gulf Stream net mass transport at all, but instead would shift its northern return flow southwards, with many severe regional consequences.
The system can weaken or
shut down entirely if the North Atlantic surface -
water salinity somehow drops too low to allow the
formation of deep - ocean
water masses.
The influx could slow down or
shut off the North Atlantic Deep
Water (NADW) formation, the driving factor behind the conveyor belt current known as thermohaline circulation, which brings large amounts of warm water to the North Atlantic re
Water (NADW)
formation, the driving factor behind the conveyor belt current known as thermohaline circulation, which brings large amounts of warm
water to the North Atlantic re
water to the North Atlantic region.