Water regulators said they approved a plan by some of the state's most senior
water rights holders to voluntarily cut back water use by 25 % in exchange for assurances they would not face further cuts
Other recommendations include building a peripheral canal to ferry some Sierra runoff around the delta, increasing the «groundwater banking» of water in underground aquifers, increasing a water transfer market to allow
water rights holders to sell access to water, and stepping up efforts to conserve water in urban areas.
California has been grappling with this realization as its most senior
water rights holders have begun to relinquish part of their share.
There is also the drain water: «return flows» that seep back into the river to be claimed again by «junior»
water rights holders downstream.
However, markets could encourage
water rights holders to use water more efficiently, so they can sell the excess.
Last Friday, a week before the official start of summer, the California Water Resources Control Board announced that there is insufficient water available for senior
water right holders with priority dates after 1903 in the San Joaquin and Sacramento watersheds and the Delta.
Not exact matches
If you use a little cloth - covered baby
holder in the bathtub, splash it with warm
water right before you put the baby in.
They can withdraw as much
water as they like, provided that they meet standards of «reasonable» use — while appropriative
rights holders are only entitled to specified volumes of
water.
Many
rights holders face yearly uncertainty about whether they will receive any
water.
It is designed so that
rights holders can generally expect to receive a certain percentage of their
water every year, based on the type of
water right they hold.
«Everybody has a
water supply, and we were living within ours,» said Tina Shields, interim
water department manager for the Imperial Irrigation District in California, one of the largest
rights holders to Colorado River
water and a frequent target of Mulroy's criticism.
Increasing flexibility
Water in the West is governed through archaic systems of rights, in which senior rights holders get first dibs on water supplies, which they lose to junior rights holders if they don't use them al
Water in the West is governed through archaic systems of
rights, in which senior
rights holders get first dibs on
water supplies, which they lose to junior rights holders if they don't use them al
water supplies, which they lose to junior
rights holders if they don't use them all up.
Water in the West is governed through archaic systems of rights, in which senior rights holders get first dibs on water supplies, which they lose to junior rights holders if they don't use them al
Water in the West is governed through archaic systems of
rights, in which senior
rights holders get first dibs on
water supplies, which they lose to junior rights holders if they don't use them al
water supplies, which they lose to junior
rights holders if they don't use them all up.
Carrier features fun trend -
right print, removable shoulder strap and
water bottle
holder.
(
right sunken recess) anti-slip «please - stick» mesh, perspex, vinyl print of opposite recess sculptures, welded PVC, Derry City
water, silicone - cast stone from building, teddy bear plastic mould (includes Originals sticker, found diamanté earring, found Japanese toy token, found holographic sequin, miniature cow armature), found burst balloon and
holder, found gold - effect earring, Lamlac milk powder, found coffee lid, window vinyl with double reflection.
They have various contractual obligations to
water purchasers such as the City of Austin, and to
holders of older
water rights on the pre-impoundment river channel.
No
water right grants any party the
right to waste or make unreasonable use of
water, a nd any
water right can be curtailed or revoked if it is determined that the
holder of that
right has engaged in a wasteful or unreasonable use of
water.
Amend the PBC regime to provide that the statutory requirements for PBCs to consult with and obtain the consent of native title
holder on «native title decisions» 4 are limited to decisions to surrender native title
rights and interests in relation to land and
waters.
The native title
rights and interests do not confer possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of the land and
waters on the native title
holders to the exclusion of all others.
Water rights are considered a legal right to water use such as native title, harvestable right or for stock and domestic purposes, or other licence ho
Water rights are considered a legal
right to
water use such as native title, harvestable right or for stock and domestic purposes, or other licence ho
water use such as native title, harvestable
right or for stock and domestic purposes, or other licence
holder.
While s 211 of the Native Title Act preserves the
right of native title
holders to fish or engage in traditional activities, s 212 confirms the Crown's
right to use and control the flow of
water.
to the extent that the land or
waters in the determination area are not covered by a non-exclusive agricultural lease or a non-exclusive pastoral lease - whether; the native title
rights and interests confer possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of that land or
waters on the native title
holders to the exclusion of all others.
(e) to the extent that the land or
waters in the determination area are not covered by a non-exclusive agricultural lease or a non-exclusive pastoral lease — whether the native title
rights and interests confer possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of that land or
waters on the native title
holders to the exclusion of all others.»
However, with limitations such as those identified above and Court decisions confirming the interaction with State and Territory
rights to
water, high impact development is validated without any real opportunity for native title
holders to challenge these activities.
to the extent that the land or
waters in the determination area are not covered by a non-exclusive agricultural lease or a non-exclusive pastoral lease — whether the native title
rights and interests confer or conferred possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of the land or
waters on its
holders to the exclusion of all others.
a) The act is not likely to interfere directly with the carrying on of the community or social activities of the persons who are the
holders... of native title in relation to the land or
waters concerned; and b) The act is not likely to interfere with areas or sites of particular significance, in accordance with their traditions, to the persons who are the
holders... of native title in relation to the land or
waters concerned; and c) The act is not likely to involve major disturbance to any land or
waters concerned or create
rights whose exercise is likely to involve major disturbance to any land or
waters concerned.
That is, the «carrying on of the community or social activities» of the particular native title -
holders, or with «areas or sites of particular significance» according to the traditions of the particular native title
holders and is not itself likely to or create
rights whose exercise is likely to «involve major disturbance to any land or
waters concerned».
The proposed changes to the PBC regulations provide that the requirements for PBCs to consult with and obtain the consent of native title
holders on native title decisions are limited to decisions to surrender native title
rights and interests in relation to land and
waters.32