Two full - range drivers and a passive bass radiator are hidden behind a dual - diamond cut fascia, while the amp pushes out a claimed 6
watts per side.
The system is powered by a 4 - channel Class D amplifier that pushes a claimed 10
watts per side.
Not exact matches
On the cost
side, SolarCity has steadily brought down the cost of deploying solar assets over time by focusing on reducing sales, installation and overhead costs
per installed
watt.
Comparatively, the ChiliPad operates at an average of 80
watts of energy
per side when cooling and is only ON when you're sleeping.
These
watts per square metre are irrelevant, even if they made any sense — you quote the wiki giving uv, visible and infrared yet AGWSF in its fiction Greenhouse Effect Energy Budget gives shortwave infrared from the Sun as only 1 % of its «Solar», its «Shortwave in» — it considers it insignificant and most of the time it isn't even mentioned, nor the shortwave uv the other
side of visible which is included in the «shortwave in».
What certainly not true is that 1/2 of 1360
watts per square or 680
watts per square meter does reach the average sun lit
side of surface Earth.
The impedance for each speaker is 6 ohms, and Aperion recommends 20 to 300
watts of power
per side.