Sentences with phrase «way about any name»

Not exact matches

Whether you want to trumpet a new product, spread the word about a sale, or simply say, «Hey, [first name], you are important to us,» e-mail marketing is a great way to interact with customers.

To keep the momentum up, she's also doing «content marketing,» or positioning herself as an expert and writing, blogging and speaking about nutritional topics — all part of a way to keep her store's name trending.

Armed with information about what causes names to go in one in one ear and out the others, can we figure out any ways to remember this all important bit of information about new acquaintances?

You would be surprised how many people search for my name as a way to learn more about my business.

Churchill says big name musicians are choosy about who they'll work with, so he approached recruiting the same way and nabbed Corey Myers as his partner and Bill Coyman, who is now head of VonChurch North America.

Instead of considering names that simply describe the brand, find ways to creatively think about how a brand behaves.

In a tiny R&D suite in a nondescript office building in the unglamorous Silicon Valley exurb of San Leandro, a lanky, red - haired molecular biologist named Eric Schulze is fiddling with a microscope, and I'm about to get a look at that better way.

Your e-mail signature is a great way to let people know more about you, especially when your e-mail address is does not include your full name or company.

«I just don't have anything to say about documents like that that nobody has the courage to put their name on and that they leak in that way.

So if you're not picky about baking with a big bank name, you can probably save way more at another bank.

Rob Artigo: And, of course, Tough Things First is the name of your book and it's important to note right here that if you want to learn more about these traits and other aspects of entrepreneurship, the book, Tough Things First, is a great way to go.

«I just don't have anything to say about documents like that that nobody has the courage to put their name on and that they leak in that way,» Rosenstein said.

We have some quick stories about Abraham traveling around with sarah every where, occasionally screwing stuff in the name of good, almost killing his son in the name of god, selling his wife up the river a couple of times in the name of god, sounds awfully predictable and robot like to me, and yet you have odysessus, a constant lost hero trying to make his way back to his wife penelope and struggling with his own morality, journeys, trials and ultimate success.

It's more about if the holy spirit is leading this WAY of confrontation — one that is directed at the world not the pastors and one that includes a cartoon with 3 pastors names and a bunch of comments essentially saying «haha got cha»....

That's quite sweet in a way — it takes all the responsibility off of you and puts it on God — name another relationship like this you know about in real life (whether with family, friends, or wife)?

We are hearing about some serious spiritual, physical and emotional abuse here using the Name of Jesus in a nefarious way.

Again, I really want to stress this is not about the messy never ending post divorce antics with an NPD but the culture of leaders in this publishing / speaking / minor celebrity circle that have smeared names and reputations in order to appear one way while behind the scenes another story is going on.

Oh, he came with a different name — but the Bible is very clear that the prophecy about Elijah coming and preparing the way for the Messiah, was fulfilled in the person of John the Baptist.

People that do nt know the Lord would think that way, read the bible then u will know what God is about, God cares about your soul in the name of Jesus, he wants to save your soul from hell if u would surrender your life to him and live for him, he is not concern about no football game or worldly things, he wants u to come to him and get saved thats what God is about, learn of him read the Holy Bible.

what is very interesting to me tonite is the folks who are positive there is no god... what is equally interesting is the snarling that appears whenever one does not «toe» the atheist line of no god... It has been said over and over here, «there is no proof of your God» ad nauseum I might add... OK... please, I am asking you in the nicest possible way... explain to me, without a Designed, where the universe and all it entails, first got its source... I really would like to know... from everything I see, I see beauty, design, tragedy, poetry, poverty, etc.... How did we begin to name or classify any of this... what intelligence gave us our intelligence... I have yet to see an anwer posited as to how it all came about, absent a Designer... I will wait for an answer... How did it ALL get here, and explain the precision and engineering of it all — right down to the last jot of DNA.

And by the way, grow - up about name - calling please.

In their comments, some readers have asked about practical ways in which we can kick the habit of using God's name carelessly in order to justify our decisions and desires.

and he argues that the doctrines about him «name a mystery which is felt rather than thought; and people may very well feel differently about different ways of phrasing the mystery».

It is biased to all other ways of thinking except his and on top of that he chooses to name Christian leaders, without knowing the full truth about where they stand and he chooses those same ones for just about every article he writes.

All I was trying to say what the the way to approach this serious issue is NOT by posting comments on public blogs about the people and naming them publicly on these blogs.

btw: I only responded to your part about women but if you want to go the way of 9 - 11, those men who hi - jacked those planes that day did so in the name of your prophet.

The writers accurate use of common names of the time shows they had access to reliable information about the people and places involved in the history of Jesus and that their writings took place at about the same time as the events (there would have been no way to access information regarding names of that time hundreds of years after the period, remember, no books, no libraries, etc..)

It can be easy to criticize the way some people have gone about fighting for justice in various women's issues, but Christians should respond to even misguided justice efforts graciously in Jesus» name.

She could have published this without her last name and photo, but the way she (and CNN) did this shows how clueless both are about AA.

@ Sam, You can find way more than you'd ever want to know about me on my blog — click on my name to get there.

The Bible proves Christianity in exactly the same way The Lord of the Rings proves Elves exist, and the Catcher in the Rye was about a real young man named Holden Caulfield.

We have already learned some important facts about him: He is from the Global South; he takes a bus to work; he is the first Jesuit elected; and he has taken the name Francis, invoking the memory of those great saints, Francis of Assisi and Francis Xavier, both Church reformers in their own way.

And, oh, when the hour - glass has run out, the hourglass of time, when the noise of worldliness is silenced, and the restless or the ineffectual busyness comes to an end, when everything is still about thee as it is in eternity — whether thou wast man or woman, rich or poor, dependent or independent, fortunate or unfortunate, whether thou didst bear the splendor of the crown in a lofty station, or didst bear only the labor and heat of the day in an inconspicuous lot; whether thy name shall be remembered as long as the world stands (and so was remembered as long as the world stood), or without a name thou didst cohere as nameless with the countless multitude; whether the glory which surrounded thee surpassed all human description, or the judgment passed upon thee was the most severe and dishonoring human judgement can pass — eternity asks of thee and of every individual among these million millions only one question, whether thou hast lived in despair or not, whether thou wast in despair in such a way that thou didst not know thou wast in despair, or in such a way that thou didst hiddenly carry this sickness in thine inward parts as thy gnawing secret, carry it under thy heart as the fruit of a sinful love, or in such a way that thou, a horror to others, didst rave in despair.

Now, you can argue if you like that what they wrote about him is inaccurate or flawed in some way, but I think there's ample evidence that a man named Jesus lived.

Likewise, the Presbyterian Church (USA)'s changes to its policy took place over a much longer time than Azumah names, involved persons holding many positions left undescribed, and came about not because the denomination chose to ignore the Scriptures but because over time, many of us became convinced that there are theologically and historically faithful ways of reading the Scriptures that find space for contemporary understandings of homosexuality.

I am often speaking to an individual about someone they strongly dislike (even hate), and rather than refer to that other person in any way, either by their actual name or even some derogatory name (that fool, that idiot, that moron), the person I am talking to will simply say something like, «I can't stand to be around that... any longer!»

The phrase «baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit» may just be another way of saying, «teaching them fully about the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, helping them understand Who God is and live more like God in our lives.»

Are they the one's on Earth controlling our lives or are you about God the creator of universe that is worshipped by mankind in different ways, given different names, given different looks and combinations, partners, sons... others worshiped Satan or made him partner to God... The Message of the «Monotheism» was there from time of existance up to Noah PBUH and the monotheist derived from those saved by Noah named Abraham PBUH who came up then with the message of «Submission» and rebuilt the house of worship in Mecca for religion teachings redirecting pagans worshiping idols, trees, or worshiping many Gods they made and named as in Greek mythology...

If I go back and look at the themes I wrote about 20 years ago, the words I used, the way I thought about God, the names I used for God, and a whole host of other ideas, the «me» of 20 years ago writes nothing like the «me» of today.

In truth the Revelation of St. John the Divine is the Ark of the Testament; and the Revelation of Jesus Christ was the Book hidden in this Ark and carried to me through the 2,000 years that seperated the time when John first got it; and then; (as it is written at chapter 10 of his own Revelation) at the very last sentence of that chapter; when it is said to him by the angel of the Covenant Jonathan (who John the Baptist was named after, by the way) that he «would have to prophesy again»; as to explain what his Revelation was all about: otherwise the Revelation would have absolutely sered no purpose at all; and it does; as all will soon shortly know.

Highlights for me included: 1) Belcher's call in Chapter 3 to find common ground in classic / orthodox Christianity (the Apostle's Creed, the Nicene Creed, and the Athanasian Creed) which, if applied, would dramatically reduce some of the name - calling and accusations of heresy that have been most unhelpful in the discussion between the emerging and traditional camps, 2) Belcher's fabulous treatment of postmodernism and postfoundationalism in Chapter 4, where he rightly explains that when talking about postmodernism, folks in the emerging church and the traditional church are using the same term to refer to two completely different things, and where he concludes that «a third way rejects classical foundationalism and hard postmodernism,» and 3) Belcher's fair handling of the atonement issue in Chapter 6, in which he clarifies that most emergering church leaders «are not against atonement theories and justification, but want to see it balanced with the message of the kingdom of God.»

In Philemon, for example, Paul uses the words achrēston (useless) and euchrēston (useful) as a way of making a point about Onesimus (whose name means «Useful») and his relation to Paul and Philemon in Christ (Christos).

In truth the revelation of St. John the Divine is the Ark of the Testament; and the Revelation of Jesus Christ was the Book hidden in this Ark and carried to me through the 2,000 years that seperated the time when John first got it; and then; (as it is written at chapter 10 of his own Revelation) at the very last sentence of that chapter; when it is said to him by the angel of the Covenant Jonathan (who John the Baptist was named after, by the way) that he «would have to prophesy again»; as to explain what his Revelation was all about.

: O's of passion, interior acts of attention, not being a story in which the names don't matter but the way of telling («W. H. Auden's poem «The Cave of Nakedness», in About the House, Faber.)

You may say Deborah is of the Old Testament, what about the New Testament Church?Well, we have Priscilla who taught a man named Apollos.Whether Apollos was taken outside the congregation or whatever (and ofcourse he couldn't be interrupted that way) the point is, a woman together with her husband, taught a man.If this was such a grave thing, Priscilla could've backed out and left the teaching for her husband alone, instead she does the opposite.

If we can avoid the dangers of environmental devastation or global warfare brought about by the megalomaniacal pursuit of technological power, and the almost equally dreary prospect of a world of persons controlled by behavioral engineers in the name of technological rationality, we may move into a future in which the pursuit of power and rational order gives way to the cultivation of «intensities of experience.»

But, just as is human nature, it was not long before they returned to their wicked ways, and about 100 years later, a prophet by the name of Nahum arose in Israel, and he too pronounced judgement upon Nineveh.

In Christian theology we use the language of sin to understand this — but too often sin is just a way of whining about things that make us uncomfortable instead of naming injustice and evil.

Frankly, my frustration with Beckianity has made it hard for me to think clearly about this issue, and I am confronted daily with my own tendency to judge, belittle, and even hate those who use the name of Jesus in this way.

This thinker, whose name I shall not disclose, said that he was becoming more and more convinced that there was «something in the older metaphysical — he called them «ontological» — claims; at the moment he was much concerned, he said, to find a way of giving more than linguistic status to such propositions as «personal God», for it appeared to him that these statements somehow pointed to a truth about the universe, about the nature of things, that must be reckoned with in any honest description of the «way things are».