Sentences with phrase «way bit by bit»

This farce has to be exposed and chipped way bit by bit till it's very foundations are razed.

Just as with talking about drugs and alcohol, it will be much easier to feel your way bit by bit rather than saving up everything for one lecture.

Not exact matches

Measuring GDP is a bit complicated but the calculation can be done in one of two ways — by adding up what everyone earned in a year, or by adding up what everyone spent.

The only way to prevent the infection is to avoid being bitten by mosquitoes.

And don't try to grab or harass the animals in any way — people provoke bites by doing this.

Start by knowing your business inside out - that way you'll be aware whether a bit of competitor knowledge will be a help or hindrance.

«You're giving up a bit of your potential upside of succeeding by IPO, but you're increasing the possibility of succeeding by trade sale or in other ways,» he says.

The way that the company is run is by understanding the importance of the individual: You clearly can run a business just focusing on delivering a task or you can run a business while you focus on delivering a purpose, and the purpose being a little bit bigger than the task.

For example, there are surely lots of ways for the company to make money by selling the right bits of the vast trove of information it currently has about its roughly 900 million users.

«We'll actually have the chef come in and do the final bits of assembly right on site to make it more interactive,» Lorton offers by way of example.

Typically, the scammers trick people into running pernicious code on their computers that encrypts their contents — a process that is often irreversible, except by way of a special cryptographic key or string of digital bits.

If you're aiming more for creativity than productivity and have a bit more time to devote to a morning writing practice, you might want to give the idea of Morning Pages, developed by Julia Cameron in her book The Artist's Way, a try.

«When I was first bit by the Bitcoin bug, I tried to get involved in as many ways as I could think of.

And while visual content was supposed to alleviate the problem by condensing information into bite - sized, snackable pieces, the bad news is that the explosion of visual content has, in a lot of ways, made matters worse.

By the way, this also serves as a voice mail message, with just a bit of tweaking at the end.

He went on to say that in his opinion «Canadians culturally are quite a bit more utilitarian, more conservative, more practical in some ways [than Americans]» which he points to as being the main reason why initial interactions with Tilt by Canadian users have been less robust than Tilt's experience with American users of the platform.

He punctures the myth of the superiority of mutual funds and instead declares that by using a bit of common sense, low - cost index funds are the way to go for most modest stock investors.

I've picked up quite a bit just by being around our CEO, Kyle, for the past few years — he's been in and out and up and down in startups, and has shared some of the hard lessons he learned along the way.

But even if the numbers didn't cause a run - up in stock price, they were impressive on their own — and were made a bit more so by the way Amazon came into its quarterly conference call ready to discuss a variety of its efforts.

Unfortunately, the only way to try to change it is by being a bit more vocal as a group.

That's been a great way to reach our regular readers, but some connect with us the way I'm doing so right now — by way bits and bites.

And By the way... 1 in 50 would be only 2 %... the number of gay priests and higher is quite a bit higher than the world average, and higher than in any other religion... which is explained (at least in theory of why that is the case) in the frontline I saw... they estimated it is closer to one in 5

By this way of thinking, the further we push toward a more basic understanding of things, the more we are immersed in meaningless, brutish bits of matter.

The acronym is a bit more cumbersome, but not only is the phrase more in line with what Jesus actually wanted us to do, it is also more acceptable to the largest part of the body of Christ — those who have come to God by non-Christian paths and are uncomfortable with the idea of equating Jesus the man (the way Jesus looked physically) with God.

It is also possible to recognize other ways of reading the New Testament: not only midrash, but also typology and allegory are modes of reading which, given their assumptions and rules of discourse, are every bit as disciplined and «true» as that offered by the literalist renderings of the historical - critical method.

Use the bible for the good bits — love your neighbour, etc --(which is common sense, by the way) and throw out the god mumbo jumbo

I was feeling a bit this way this morning, having just read a few profoundly deep theologian's blogs followed by all the contradictory comments... and coming here has been the truest «ahh» moment.

By the way, even though I deleted quite a bit of my original 100,000 words, the manuscript now sits at 140,000 words.

I could tell by the way Jesus twitched and squirmed that the ants were not just climbing over His body, but were biting Him as well.

But — if I do happen to be distracted by her lovely form, I do not feel the slightest bit of guilt... because I now know that what I am thinking is not «sinful» or wrong in any way.

Viewed this way, the infinite is, so to speak, separated into two parts: on the one hand, the infinity of possibility which offers an inexhaustible supply of the new, bit by bit, and on the other, God's infinite unification of experience moment by moment.

I actually think his case would be strengthened quite a bit by the way we understand such terms.

This is an answer required by Darwinism, and it is every bit as spooky in its own way as Kant's «noumenal» self.

Please don't think I'm going all Porcher on you: But the argument that America has in some ways become too oligarchic is nontrivial (even THE WALL STREET JOURNAL is starting to notice a bit), and it's not that clear that smaller government or lower taxes by themselves will grow jobs for our increasingly pathological middle / lower middle class.

Viewing things that way takes all the pressure off, relaxes us and a by - product of being relaxed and unpressured is that we become a bit nicer!!

@honestanon Just a quick one here but if you do a bit of research you will see many clashes at Gurdwaras around the World and a great number of them are from good, honest hard - working Sikhs who see that a few individuals with an extremist viewpoint try to make their way in to our Gurdwaras, gain trust and then later show their true colors by trying to implement their extremist views.

The years go by and I become more and more aware of my pioneer lineage, I understand the pull west better, I feel suffocated without a bit of a space, without an early morning walk beside the yarrow patch, I need the north, and I need the west in a way that veers towards the mystical, which is just fine to a Holy Spirit adoring tongue talker like me.

Only children know the way (I can go a bit down the path by memory — if I try hard to forget that I have a mortgage) and as long as they have the way clear, oh, send them down that path with peace.

Over time I stepped back bit by bit from the many ways I was involved in the church, until one day I walked out the doors knowing I wouldn't return.

By the way, I had always felt that Gandhi's quote was a bit self - serving coming from him, as respect for animals is one of the few things that Hinduism and other eastern religions does better than most.

Jeremy i think satanic forces is more likely in that particular storm with Jesus and his disciples in the boat that was to test his disciples faith and they failed the test.Jesus rebuked the storm there was a power that was out to destroy them why else would he rebuke it maybe he was waiting foir them to rebuke it themselves they had prayed for people and seen healing they had commanded evil spirit to come out of people so they were aware of the power of God.Yet they were in fear of there lives faithless and afriad.Paul on his way to rome was caught in a storm and through an angel paul was told many would die Paul interceeded for the crew and lives on board and God promised that all would be spared.Paul had warned them before the voyage that it would end in disaster but they did not listen.Satan wasnt happy with that plan because he had hoped to kill as many people as possible there was over 300 souls on board and many had been expected to die.So satan attempted to kill Paul and he was bitten by a snake but satan is no match for Jesus Christ he has been defeated and so Paul lived and continued to preach the gospel was many being saved.brentnz

Some readers may be a bit surprised by Kennedy's and Simon's own acceptance of a (nearly) Christians - only hiring policy as the only way this church - related college could maintain its identity and vocation.

This joke has more critical bite; one imagines it being told (by an alienated conservative, say) as a way of poking fun at others, not oneself.

let me count the ways: 1) the bible a 2000 year old book written by sheepherders put together by a roman dictator and cut and pasted by every pope in history is your authority on events that aren't recorded anywhere else in human history... without stretching things a bit.

As important as it is to seek out better ways of reading the Bible, I think we have to start by deconstructing a bit, and Smith does a good job of addressing what has become a troublesome hallmark of American evangelical culture — biblicism.

II suppose any of us could die instantaneously in all manner of ways; however, in the meantime, I think I'll up my odds just a bit by * not bull riding.

Basically the same view underlies the ethos of many Episcopal theological schools, although with a good bit of ambiguity generated, perhaps, by the way differences in church polity and theology of ordination alter the clarity of the idea of being «in orders.»

Let me reverse that question and dance with it a bit on the high heels of generality, asking, What is there by way of a common structure that is good in process thought?

I propose to show that Popper leapt to this conclusion a bit too hastily; for the passage he quotes by way of illustration does not permit an unequivocal reading.

By the way, this works a bit better if you've just eaten at Chic Fil A!