Sentences with phrase «way convincing evidence»

I have not read any half - way convincing evidence to support the truth of this claim, and find it very hard to imagine how it could happen.

Not exact matches

I knew that it was something I could test and prove (or at least provide convincing evidence for) one way or the other.

Still, as is clear from the avalanche of sometimes outraged postings on all the relevant Internet sites, there is simply no way to convince conspiracy theorists that the evidence for their position is too thin to be convincing and that the evidence for a traditional view is thoroughly persuasive.

Since Christians were proclaiming that Jesus was risen from the dead, what better way of confounding them could there be than to open the tomb of Jesus, produce the dead body and show with convincing evidence that he had not risen?

It is a way of pointing out the rather extraordinary fact that the primary and really convincing evidence which Christians claim to discover for the reality and power of God for them is in their relation to Jesus.

Before and since Moody the chief standard of success as an evangelist (and a minister) in American Protestantism has been evidence of such charisma, of power not possessed by ordinary folk — the ability to manifest in a convincing way that one represents more than himself, in short, that one is a man of God.

But convincing others that your TRUTH is the only way requires evidence.

The striking similarity between the Sufism of Seh Siti Djenar and the Iranian al - Hallaj could probably not be accepted in itself as convincing evidence that Islam came to Java by way of Iran, but it is a significant part of the evidence for believing that Islam as it was known in Java came through Iran and from there through western India and Sumatra.

Evidence that animal pheromones don't always work in they way we thought, backed up by a growing number of brain - imaging studies in humans, is convincing some researchers that we really do make and respond to pheromones.

One way to convince the skeptics is with better biological evidence.

This sort of very direct and easily understood result has a way of waking up far more of the public than the other very convincing evidence of past years.

In their analysis they also in effect compare the amplitudes of two series which have been band - pass filtered in a similar way, and do not provide convincing evidence that they really are related — there are wiggles of similar frequencies, as expected when they have been band - pass filetered, but they do not exhibit a convincing one - to - one correspondence (in neither phase or amplitude), and the authors do not discuss the level of statistical significance.

However, there has yet to be convincing evidence that you can do tricep presses, for example, and lose fat in the back of your arms... Just doesn't work that way.

Roundtree) who finds a way to explain each of Corky's hijinks as examples of heroism, and the sticky realization that if the forged documents are convincing enough to get Corky into the FBI building and the FBI director's good graces, then what he needs to do is check the evidence against his father out of the evidence room, thus potentially ending the film about ten minutes into it.

Collaboration: When students are exposed to writing from their peers by way of feedback and collaboration, especially when it's live collaboration (Google doc / Twitter), students are able to develop stronger ideas, find convincing evidence and be creative in composition generally.

The value in reviewing policies regularly is that, in the event of litigation, such evidence can go a long way in convincing courts that educators are doing their best to be up - to - date in maintaining safe, orderly schools while safeguarding the rights of all in school communities in the face of rapid changes in the world of technology.

(2) Setting the Standards of «Good Evidence» Before the creation of IES, many lamented that educational research was failing to answer important questions in convincing ways.

The new report, by Chad Aldeman and Ashley LiBetti Mitchel of Bellwether Education Partners, is based on years of research «which has generally failed to turn up convincing evidence of the best way to train teachers or on how to predict who will perform well once they start teaching.»

Changing the common sense beliefs of teachers about heterogeneous grouping effects on the learning of struggling students requires those providing leadership to bring relevant evidence to the attention of their colleagues in accessible and convincing ways, to encourage actual trials with heterogeneous groupings under conditions which include opportunities for practice, feedback and coaching and to help teachers generate «the kind of assessment information that will make the impact of tracking and detracking more visible» (Riehl, 2000).

By the way I like your answer and +1'd it but I'm accepting the other one because Brian's characterization of replacement as «preventative maintenance» and personal experience going through «several sets» of replacement wires is probably the most convincing evidence that I'm best off making use of the (probably much better) factory wires as long as they work.

Maybe there is a better way to convince him if it can't be with evidence.

Is there any convincing evidence or analysis you see that says this is in any way about climate, particular, as distinct from the noted issues with mercury in rice and high smog levels and the like?

11:50 a.m.: Cathy Zoi of the Department of Energy challenges the (friendly, invited) audience to go beyond the cheery atmospherics of what she called «an evidence - based revival meeting» and propose ways to convince more Americans that the country is on the cusp of a new industrial revolution.

In their analysis they also in effect compare the amplitudes of two series which have been band - pass filtered in a similar way, and do not provide convincing evidence that they really are related — there are wiggles of similar frequencies, as expected when they have been band - pass filetered, but they do not exhibit a convincing one - to - one correspondence (in neither phase or amplitude), and the authors do not discuss the level of statistical significance.

The problem is, rather, that there is no evidence, and no clever way of framing the issue that is going to convince the tribal right to go against their shibboleths on this issue.

If the public knew the extent of evidence on all the ways climate change is affecting the Earth, Harvey said, «then maybe they would be more convinced.»

However, if you look closely, you'll see that the evidence for the latter argument comes in one way or the other from people invested in the exact activities pointed to as being the main culprits of climate change — people who can fabricate as many believable evidence as they can — and if you believe they wouldn't do this, then, well, there's not a lot of hope in convincing you.

For example, let's say that evidence convinced me (in a way that I wasn't convinced previously) that all recent changes in land surface temperatures and sea surface temperatures and atmospheric temperatures and deep sea temperatures and sea ice extent and sea ice volume and sea ice density and moisture content in the air and cloud coverage and rainfall and measures of extreme weather were all directly tied to internal natural variability, and that I can now see that as the result of a statistical modeling of the trends as associated with natural phenomena.

An experiment can be run many times in many ways, and I will end up having this observable evidence be the justification, the convincing, for holding this belief in my mind.

Those already convinced of the evidence are probably resiled to stay that way.

It's clear no evidence short of the establishment of a banana - growing industry in Antarctica will convince them — and even then they'd find a way to blame it on Islamofascism.

I ask that because I haven't seen evidence one way or the other that I think convincing — because I think that the uncertainties are too large in a number of ways (w / r / t to the range of sensitivity, w / r / t the massive unknowns about positive and negative externalities, w / r / t modeling future economies, etc..)

On the other hand, contrarians routinely present «evidence» in non-scientific ways, taken out of context, falsely generalizing, that is not scientifically convincing.

You might then see the error in your remark «the only way to convince them is to show evidence that CO2 is not causing the air and ocean temps to rise and find a suitable natural explanation.»

If you want to show that the majority of climate scientists are alarmists, the only way to convince them is to show evidence that CO2 is not causing the air and ocean temps to rise and find a suitable natural explanation.

Show me, in a convincing way, by using scientific measurements and empirical evidence, that this is so.

This group will be convinced (one way or the other) when sufficient evidence is provided to satisfy them.

Contrarians routinely present «evidence» in non-scientific ways, taken out of context, falsely generalizing, that is not scientifically convincing.

Either way you are going to have to present convincing evidence and make persuasive arguments to convince the insurance company, judge, or jury to provide you with a fair recovery.

I'm more convinced by the evidence in favour of ABS and don't need to be absolutely certain of the outcome to conclude on a balance of probabilities (the reasonable civil standard), that the way forward does not look anything like the way behind us.

Evidence like a traffic citation, police report, or eyewitness testimony can go a long way toward convincing an Indiana jury that the other party was negligent.

There have been numerous rumors that a Red Dead Redemption 2 is on the way, but this supposedly leaked world map from the game is the most convincing piece of evidence yet.

The best way to convince execs that you need certain resources is to offer evidence of those resources» ROI.

Since you have no evidence you're skilled in the industry, you must find other ways to convince the employer of your abilities.

Many local authorities who have piloted new approaches to relationship support were already convinced by the evidence but have had to make the case for change across a range of different services encouraging them to embrace new ways of working.