Not exact matches
He discusses another one of those ridiculous, «why conservatives think the
way they do» articles soon to be published, and weighs in with a theory of his own for
higher levels of
global warming skepticism among the world's Rush Limbaughs.
The Obama administration will host a
high - level meeting to discuss
ways to mobilize hundreds of billions of dollars in annual international
global warming assistance, State Department Special Envoy for Climate Change Todd Stern said in a recent speech.
Global warming is desiccating the region in two
ways:
higher temperatures that increase evaporation in already parched soils, and weaker winds that bring less rain from the Mediterranean Sea during the wet season (November to April).
Put the other
way round, two or three
warmer winters in a row could be due to unforced variability rather than
global warming, just as two or three
high scores in pinball do not necessarily mean the table is tilted.
If we back up a few paces, Joseph Romm's Hell and
High Water:
Global Warming the Solution and the Politics and What We Should Do will tell us exactly what the crisis is and why we need to change our
ways.
I've been criticized by some environmentalists in recent years for writing that the long - term picture (more CO2 =
warmer world = less ice =
higher seas and lots of climatic and ecological changes) is the only aspect of human - caused
global warming that is solidly established, and that efforts to link dramatic weather - related events to the human influence on climate could backfire should nature wiggle the other
way for awhile.
The Stern Report believes the figure to be
higher, and recommends avoided deforestation as the most immediate and inexpensive
way to slow
global warming.
And that's great for keeping our gadgets charged, but considering that our daily personal power needs are much
higher than just that of our gizmos, and that if the electricity goes out, we have no
way to keep essential appliances running, so while we'll be able to have a fully charged phone, we'll also have our own little
global warming event in our freezer.
By the
way, my contract with the energy company was negotiated in 2006, at the height of my status as a «
high priestess of
global warming.»
Results show relatively increased
warming in the
global average over the 21st century owing to reconstruction of temperatures in
high northern latitudes, supporting the findings of Cowtan &
Way (2014) and Karl et al. (2015).
After a discussion on
global warming, using examples from Plan B 2.0, Utah's governor appointed 15
high - level leaders to a Blue Ribbon Advisory Committee to come up with
ways to implement Plan B at the state level.
The well below freezing surface winter temperatures of Northern
high latitudes are such wildly variable almost non-correlated data points which tell almost nothing of the real
warming (i.e. increase in heat content of the Earth system) but may affect in an unpredictable
way the
global average surface temperature.
By the
way (although like most sceptics you are probably able to hold two contradictory views at the same time), have you realised that If the MWP was (a)
global and (b)
warmer than today that suggests that sensitivity is
high?
Because the risks and damages from
global warming go up significantly the
higher that temperatures rise, even 2.5 °C
warming is still preferable to 3 °C, which is better than 4 °C, which is
way better than 5 °C.
He and other climate scientists insist there's still no
way to point to any particular meteorological calamity and firmly finger human - caused
global warming, despite
high confidence that such
warming is already well under
way.
C / decade and the simulated ensemble mean over the models, calculated from the grid boxes of the models where observations exist (which is flawed in my opinion, since excluding of mostly the
high latitudes from the model data may emphasize a
warm bias in lower latitudes in the models making them appear
warmer than they are, but a possible cold bias of the
global observations data set is not excluded in this
way) had a trend of 0.3 deg.
More on the
high, but heretofore largely neglected, role that soot plays in increasing
global warming: Research from Stanford University shows that soot is second only to carbon dioxide in its
warming contribution, and that reducing it may be the only
way we can stop Arctic sea ice melting.
That's an odd
way to describe the scientist who coined the term «
global warming», and the inventor of the Gaia hypothesis, and the winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics, and the proponent of the Mobile Polar
High, the Chief Scientist of the UK Met Office, the President of the Royal Statistical Society, etc, etc..