Financial markets are a prime example of
the way human biases can manifest at either end of a spectrum of emotions: this is the core of behavioral finance, where the study of economics and psychology intersect.
Not exact matches
The convergence model represents
human communication as a dynamic, cyclical process over time, characterized by (1) mutual causation rather than one -
way mechanistic causation, and emphasizing (2) the interdependent relationship of the participants, rather than a
bias toward either the gisource» or the «receiver» of «messages.»
When one views the world with no definite theological
bias one
way or the other, one sees that order and disorder, as we now recognize them, are purely
human inventions.
For now, I will just highlight the fact that
human pollsters are weird,
biased and entertaining, in the most
human way possible.
AP poll voters are
biased and weird, in an endearing and ultimately
human way.
But you seem to be missing a very important point: nobody will have the knowledge and experience and not develop a
bias one
way or the other, it's just plain
human nature.
One of the reasons
biases are so rampant is rooted in the
human need for «cognitive consistency,» which means processing information in a
way that confirms preset beliefs, explains Ann - Sophie Chaxel, a professor at Virginia Tech and author of the study.
We need to look for new
ways of studying optimism
bias to establish whether it is a universal feature of
human cognition or not.
«Scientists are
human too, and I think we often fall prey to this very
human but
biased way of thinking,» Ledgerwood notes.
Late 1960s In a series of experiments, psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky demonstrate the downside of the
way humans make decisions, identifying several unconscious, systemic
biases that consistently distort
human judgment.
Scientists say this
bias may be what enables
humans to work together in large numbers — even with complete strangers — in
ways that other species do not.
So although
human decision - making might introduce a degree of
bias, it would be a random error and shouldn't skew results one
way or the other.
Dr. G is
human and fallible and
biased in his own
ways, but I trust him 10,000 x more than any corporate entity or governing body.
In a nutshell, in the years to come, we have to move away from, dare I say, «Dropbox» - style Learning Management Systems that have a
bias towards the purportedly - pedagogically - sound text - based (social)- constructivist activities, to much smarter, universally accessible Learning Management Systems; ones that can learn, think, adapt, and take action in a
way that allows for personalisation of learning, and in a
way that reinforces (live)
human - to -
human interaction.
Smart Beta ETFs are a great
way to gain relatively low - cost exposure to a more sophisticated and nuanced investment style that is time tested and free from
human bias.
If you believe in active there a
way to outperform why not use smart beta etfs where you eliminate
human bias and emotion, why wouldnt you use smart beta?
In my 40 years as a scientist, I have certainly seen some of my colleagues, acting in their role as normal
human beings, occasionally get carried away in their enthusiasm and let nons - cientific
biases affect the
way they represent their scientific judgment to the public.
* The role of the US in global efforts to address pollutants that are broadly dispersed across national borders, such as greenhouse gasses, persistent organic pollutants, ozone, etc...; * How they view a president's ability to influence national science policy in a
way that will persist beyond their term (s), as would be necessary for example to address global climate change or enhancement of science education nationwide; * Their perspective on the relative roles that scientific knowledge, ethics, economics, and faith should play in resolving debates over embryonic stem cell research, evolution education,
human population growth, etc... * What specific steps they would take to prevent the introduction of political or economic
bias in the dissemination and use of scientific knowledge; * (and many more...)
Or more in keeping with
human tendencies, in the
way their
biases might pre-dispose them to believe true.
Pollsters can get alarmist - sounding results from their surveys can
bias their results by phrasing the question this vague
way (in terms of «
human activity»).
Thus, by
way of the institutionalized journalistic norm of balanced reporting, United States television news coverage has perpetrated an informational
bias by significantly diverging from the consensus view in climate science that
humans contribute to climate change.
It would be even better if the software was intelligent and was able to study all the data and learn about how the climate works without
biased humans getting in the
way.
But in this world, with
humans full of cognitive
biases, green should probably take the time to make sure that what they are saying isn't being obscured by the
way it is said.
When the
human lawyer engages with a dynamic, artificially intelligent, less -
biased system that establishes legal connections — including some that a
human may not yet have found — then the lawyer engaging with it will have stronger options in coming up with legal answers, and will understand -LRB-» learn») that legal area in a deeper
way.
Judges are
human, and a lot of them will be
biased in some
way without being so
biased that someone else needs to hear the case.
AI allows for analysis of big data in
ways that
humans can not, but to address
bias creep in these models requires scrutiny.