Sentences with phrase «way humans think»

The company's head of AI research Yann LeCun and research engineer Soumith Chintala have described their ideal system as being «capable of not only text and image recognition but also higher - order functions like reasoning, prediction and planning, rivaling the way humans think and behave.»

It was a towering achievement of human intellect and changed the way humans think.

Not exact matches

A fun way to celebrate Labour Day is to think about all the ways in which robots are making human jobs and tasks easier or better.

In a realm of swirling, incomprehensible big biological data — which is, perhaps, another way of thinking about the human body — the opportunity to use computer learning to better anticipate which drugs will work well (and not so well) in any one person is one we shouldn't pass up.

He thought that made the magazines better, in the same way prehistoric humans thought eating a lion's heart could make them fierce warriors.

«Their basic thought is robotics and A.I. are going to weave their way into more and more skills that used to be human skills,» says Lee Rainie, Pew's director of internet, science, and technology research.

The only thing that I can think of is if humans being there is inherently part of the economy — and the only way that happens is tourism.

We like to think it's our sound arguments and superior ideas that sway other people to our opinions, but science shows humans are way weirder than that.

The idea, which was primarily based on the research of psychologists John Mayer and Peter Salovey, quickly took off — and went on to greatly influence the way we think about emotions and human behavior.

The idea — that an ability to understand and manage emotions greatly increases our chances of success — quickly took off, and it went on to greatly influence the way people think about emotions and human behavior.

According to Sonia Zakrzewski, an associate professor of archaeology at the University of Southampton, Hublin's discovery could encourage other archaeologists to change the way they think about human origins.

«We thought Snaplications was a great way to allow us to meet job seekers where they are — their phones,» said Jez Langhorn, senior director in human resources, McDonald's USA, in a statement.

«The advancements we are making are great, but we still have a long way to go» before creating robots like those featured in Hollywood movies that can speak, think, walk, and move like humans.

As humans, we crave talking about ourselves — about 40 percent of what comes out of our mouths is devoted to telling others about our thoughts and feelings — and it's way more satisfying to showcase the exhilarating moments than it is the countless mundane ones.

Once you begin thinking in a human - centered way, you'll find that it affects everything you do.

«So as much as we all love our technology and we're always pushing out emails, I think we still need to be establishing connections at a human level and building trust that way.

Business design is a way of doing business development, which combines strategic skills, design thinking, and technological ability, but also humans in the center of change.

Economists think of GARP as basically the test which asks, «Are humans responding in a rational way to prices?»

The theory behind it is simple: If Facebook has experimented on its users to find new and exciting ways to get us to use it in the way they'd prefer, we should also feel free to experiment on Facebook, and see if those experiments change how we think about what we share with one of the biggest repositories of human data in history.

@Chuckles I was not being hostile, but am just trying to point out that you are basically willing to conflate any similar cognitive errors such as we have as humans as being significant in any way in religious terms, should it happen that we encounter some alien species that also has idiots who think imaginary stuff is real.

I'd also prefer a way of thinking that allows ALL humans to be «saved», not just those that have access to a specific human - crafted message.

They articulate a vision that shapes the way we think about human nature.

So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.

After reading several of the posts on the «interpretation of mythical texts into a book called the bible» one is left to wonder how a being who is supposed to have created the universe would permit what is often referred to as «his inerrant words»... to get so screwed up... you would think he / she / it would have been keeping a close eye on a book that he / she / it wanted to have in print for... mass distribution... it is not not a womder the bible is messed up the way it is... it is a «human» construct... only humans could mess a book up that badly... gods do nor make mistakes... except for Rick Santorum

I was trying to think of ways in which Limbaugh might be a useful human being.

The way I have tried to put it... is that you may picture human thought as a piece of solid rock, but with a crevice here and there ¯ the places, I mean, where we think and think and it just does not add up.

Once we begin to think in this way (entailing, of course, a «paradigm shift») we are able to get beyond our narrow and destructive anthropocentrism and respect nature almost as we respect our fellow humans.

By the way could the «BrainWashing» be from the uses of those Funny Shampoos and Products which are said to contain so many bad chemicals that could lead to cancers??! Any way I thought brainwashed one's are less human affectionate, rather acting as Robots in many ways so better check who does appear like that...!

Don't get me wrong, I'm not arguing that we all ought to be carbon copies of one another but fundamentally I think we want to say that there is ONE PARTICULAR way to be fully human and fully alive and that ONE PARTICULAR way is unique to Jesus, not unique to us.

Or can process thought find some way to defend itself against the charge that it has retained human factors that are not essential to experience as such?

Okay, but I don't believe in Christ and think religion is a way to comfort humans about their own mortality.

In his typical humanistic, ethicomystical way of thinking, he points to a belief in the «evolution of human spirituality» where «the higher this development in the individual is, the greater his awareness» of God» (Dr. Schweitzer of Lambarene, by Norman Cousins [Harper & Brothers, 1960], pp. 190 - 191).

I had thought that the human state of falleness was a state that somehow through discipleship with Jesus would somehow in the long run work its way out and then the gate to the tree would be open.

To me the most ironic of all are the ones who think God wanted a human blood sacrifice, and the only possible way to get on God's good side is to acknowledge that.

The point is that something frames your way of thinking about the world and how humans should and should not behave and interact with each other.

Usually when theologians say that the Bible is a human book, they mean that the Bible has human authors who use human words to discuss human ideas to human readers with human ways of thinking.

«the enemy of the human race... has thought up a way, unheard of before now, by which he might impede the saving word of God from being preached to the nations.

Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the human embryo is not as unique as we thought before... We do have to think differently about the «unique quality of human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our human brains are given to us by God... to better the life of other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»

God takes the most evil event in human history, and He redeems it in such a way so that most people today do not even think of it as evil, but as the most holy and righteous event in human history.

The human writers of scripture certainly though so, and they also thought God felt this way too, but does it «make sense?»

Chalcedon was responding to people who thought that way and who said that Jesus» nature was not human — only divine.

The oppressed have no other way of protesting their human right to live; and they think, too, that by rebelling they can change their situation for the better, if only to some small degree.

It is my experience that thinking of human beings in this way heightens the wonder.

We think not only of objects as self - contained in particular regions of space and related to one another only externally, but we think of human selves that way, too.

Think of the ways in which the name and authority of Jesus have been used to justify every sort of human cruelty.

yes Maddy...:) I personally understand the way of atheist thinking, because normally, we human since we are kids have no faith concept al all.

The «persons» of the trinity, in Christian thought, became analagous to the way people thought of human persons as independent entities, that is to say as substances.

He will not require not merely that the new knowledge be used as the foundation of the proof, but that the very spirit and atmosphere of the new knowledge enter in such a way into thedemonstration of God's existence, that the complexities and confusions of human thought engendered by the new knowledge shall be resolved in harmonious unity in the postulate of God's existence, nature, and relation to created being.

I have often thought, particularly when working in the diocesan marriage tribunal, that our acknowledgement of the fact of Original Sin gives us such a head start when it comes to understanding human nature, and why people act the way they do.

We must understand that when a man considers violence the only resort left him, when he sees it, not as a remedy and the harbinger of a new day, but as at least an indictment of the old, unjust order, when he thinks of violence as a way of affirming his outraged human dignity (his pride!)