«Is there
any way in a pluralistic society like ours to have any measure of consensus on right and wrong, good and bad, mental illness and spiritual vision?»
Not exact matches
But apart from these there is also the fact that the Church
in much of the traditionally Christian world is still on the
way from being an established Church (that is, a social institution to which all more or less belong) to a Church of personal faith
in a
pluralistic society.
Or, better said, I want to be a part of finding a
way to live together with deep differences
in a
pluralistic society.
But this criterion, while useful, ignores the many other
ways in which images can witness to faith
in a
pluralistic, technological and secular
society.
And is a
pluralistic society in a
way not the ultimate blessing since fulfilling Christ's command is done simply by stepping out of the door of your home and out of your comfort zone?
Modernity's emphasis on secularism involves three elements - a) the desacralisation of nature which produced a nature devoid of spirits preparing the
way for its scientific analysis and technological control and use; b) desacralisation of
society and state by liberating them from the control of established authority and laws of religion which often gave spiritual sanction to social inequality and stifled freedom of reason and conscience of persons; it was necessary to affirm freedom and equality as fundamental rights of all persons and to enable common action
in politics and
society by adherents of all religions and none
in a religiously
pluralistic society; and c) an abandonment of an eternally fixed sacred order of human
society enabling ordering of secular social affairs on the basis of rational discussion.
But I also believe that social justice is important given the systemic disadvantages
in our country; heterosexual divorce is probably more detrimental than gay marriage; caring for the poor goes a long
way toward reducing the «felt need» for abortion; and that setting Biblical morality up as civil law is probably not the
way to go
in a
pluralistic society...
1) multiple interpretations of the Bible exist 2) there are many
ways to apply the teachings of the Bible to public life 3) no one denomination or spokesperson has a monopoly on how to accurately interpret the Bible and apply it to public life 4) because we live
in a
pluralistic society, we must learn to raise the level of public discourse so that we not only appeal to our specific religious tradition, but to a common sense of morality and justice
Glenn believes that government funds should be made available to faith - based organizations as a demonstration of respect for the freedom required
in a
pluralistic society and as a
way of providing effective service.