Sentences with phrase «way less things»

For a start, there are way less things to wash up when you just dump ingredients in a bowl and cut out the middle man.

Not exact matches

All you have to do is try way less hard and make things easier for yourself.

There are usually ways to do things better, in less time, with less effort.

Thinking a few hours - even days — ahead will make your future self less stressed and way more productive when you don't have to waste time finding, fixing and doing things in the moment you need them.

And to get there, Alberta needs to focus more on coaxing and wheedling other provinces into seeing things its way, and less on defending a narrow «Alberta First» point of view.

The visionary thing, in other words, is way less important than other «things.»

This is a far less volatile way of doing things than using exchange rates: for example, the price of a hamburger doesn't jump 27 % simply because of currency fluctuations.

It's decent enough, but like Apple's Siri, it makes enough mistakes that it's often faster and less frustrating to do things the old - fashioned way.

Fiorina: One of the things we are really focused on [at Milstein] is how to provide a regulatory roadmap for small business, because it is virtually impossible for them to even know the rules and regulations they have to follow, much less navigate their way through them.

And the best way to compete with the winner (or current market leader) is by either doing less (not more) and focusing on one thing and doing it very well.»

It goes on all the way to people being healthier and missing less work, being more energetic doing more things and living longer to keep spending money.

Less than 1 in 3 (31 percent) said that Facebook is a «responsible company because it tries to do the right thing most of the time even if that gets in the way of it making profits.»

QUE was trading for less than its cash value... WAY less... it's the closest thing to free money that you'll find in the markets.

Yet as the story progresses, she proceeds to do a number of terrible things in her conviction about the righteousness of her cause, in a way that makes her less sympathetic.

Frugality is simply knowing the things that bring you happiness, and finding a way to do them for less (in most cases, significantly less).

Any way nice talking to you and hope you come across some thing that would change you mind into reading more... and thanks for the sight informations... As I find my self as well less bothered or interested with reading since I started using glasses for my readings, lazily or getting tired easily...

@ doobz: hypocrite = (literally) «less judging» (of yourself) in other words, the hypocrite is blind to how he / she does the very same thing (even if in a more nuanced way)

If God is present in things in living ways, then no / less reason to pound on other brothers and sisters... sometimes seems the criticisms are only because God isn't present in our meeting either.

We have forgotten its devastating disregard, or even reversal, of current worldly values, and have allowed what we call «Western civilization» or «the American way of life» to become more or less God - fearing substitutes for the real thing.

There is no way he could have even built the thing in less than a few hundres years with only three sons to help.

I since stopped asking for things and do not expect anything out of the ordinary (this way I'm less disappointed).

I have tried to carry the habits developed at the Cresset to the quite difference circumstances of First Things, where I have far more in the way of resources» if, alas, less godlike authority.

5A reading of Bacon's New Organon reveals a more nuanced and less empiricist approach to induction than Whitehead (and other twentieth - century philosophers) usually give him credit, One text in particular refers to the ascent and descent characteristic of imaginative generalizations:»... from the new light of axioms, which have been educed from those particulars by a certain method and rule, shall in their turn point out the way again to new particulars, greater things shall be looked for.

But we have not identified God or perfect being with the totality of things in any sense which prevents him from being personal and free with respect to them; for he is the flexibly self - identical totality, which is so radically independent of its parts (and they, in another way, of it) that it will be itself, no matter how they, as contingent and more or less free beings, develop....

It seems to me that a whole range of more or less conservative thinkers aim to steer a middle way between a deductive, natural law approach to political things and the anti-rationalism highlighted by Muller.

It is not an exaggeration to say there is no way the writer would say something like, «Such - and - such college has the dubious distinction of being the MOST religious campus etc. etc.» The author is fueling the notion that somehow being less religious is somehow a bad thing when each day and throughout history it has been shown time and again being more religious is more of a liability.

The realization of the crucial significance of relations between persons, and of the fundamentally social nature of reality is the necessary, saving corrective of the dominance of our age by the scientific way of thinking, the results of which, as we know, may involve us in universal destruction, and by the technical mastery of things, which threatens man with the no less serious fate of dehumanization.

Tolstoy, we're charmed to discover, was no Socrates; he, for one thing, actually loved and liked and was endlessly aroused in all sorts of way by his wife (who gave him 13 children and apparently 48 less - than - serene years).

But this is the only way immediacy knows how to fight, the one thing it knows how to do: to despair and swoon — and yet it knows what despair is less than anything else.

The being who created the entire universe and its billions of galaxies (make your choice from the above list and thousands of others) reads your mind, or — «hears your prayers» if you prefer a less embarrassing, euphamism for exactly the same thing — reacts and alters whatwould otherwise be the course of history in small ways to suit your whims.

The problem is if you either don't have certain experiences or you have different experiences or you experience the same thing but in a different way, you are made to feel less than.

I choose not to drink mostly because I know my limits, and when I struggle with self - control when it comes to much less addicting things such as sugar, chocolate, snack, etc., I would prefer not to give myself an opportunity to abuse alcohol the way I do other foods since the physical consequences have potential to be very dangerous.

What if the reason the church does things they way they do is to engage less mature Christians or non-Christians so that they are drawn in to hear the Gospel and be transformed by it?

The reason for this transition, Luke indicates, is not because God has now «chosen» the Gentiles instead of His other «chosen» people, the Jews, but because the Gentiles were more open to hearing, considering, examining, and accepting the things Paul preached to them, while the Jews are more set in their traditional ways and beliefs, and so are less willing to consider that they might be wrong.

God is existence itself.More or less... Not counting the universe.What Steven Hawkings does not understand is that the universe expands against infinity which IS God.At one point the only thing to exist was existence itself.This lone existence / infinity has an intelligence.It created the universe and all things within.The universe expands against it.The universe does not expand against nothing as Steven Hawkings suggests.Think about it.It is the only way for God to not have a creator & where God resides.

«In this room, we have various minor points of difference between us... but we are united by a gospel too great and a mission too urgent to let any lesser thing stand in our way.

The thing is, I think once we make that shift, the «debate» is over because our lives stand as a testament to the fact that being gay isn't harmful, or, to put it a better way, isn't any less beneficial than being straight.

Perhaps our version is less authentic than others yet to be told, but only in relating it does the congregation begin to come to terms with its symbolization of the way things have been for it.

Once we can discuss these things like rational human beings, I believe we will get to better understand one another... and actually like one another... and be more willing to discuss these differences in less violent ways.

My own judgment is that that doctrine of God is always to be preferred which, other things being equal, interprets his relations with the world more, rather than less, like the way we interpret the relations of other entities.

Far less controversial is the idea that when such landscapes are attacked in this way, the process does violence to things other than the landscapes themselves.

Furthermore, the cooperative way is a less expensive way to get things done, and this was a time of financial strain.

He identified evolution with God's way of doing things, overlooking some of the less pleasant aspects of the theory.

If that's too much of an «out» Jewish thing, be vegetarian — a more restrictive, but less unpopular way to keep kosher.

Missionary dating, dating someone of another faith, marrying someone of another faith... these things all come about because trusting God is extremely difficult when life becomes less than we expected, when frustration sets in because things aren't happening the way we think they are supposed to.

Martin weighs the merits of his «all truths are timeless,» or can be so formulated without loss of truth, against what he takes to be my view (for no reason in my writings that I can see) that all are time - bound; he ignores the moderate or less extreme view that some (namely, truths about extremely universal and abstract, eternal and necessary things, including the essential structure of time as such) are timeless, and others (those about less universal and abstract, also non-eternal and contingent things) are time - bound, but this not in every way a careless thinker might suppose but in a definite and logically intelligible way.

Thus: «Hence the idea of the sun will be the sun itself existing in the mind, not indeed formally, as it exists in the sky, but objectively, i.e., in the way in which objects are wont to exist in the mind; and this mode of being is truly much less perfect than that in which things exist outside the mind, but it is not on that account mere nothing, as I have already said.»

It know it will always be hard to describe what exactly you do or exactly who you are, but form the blog and your creative environment and your definitions and words and visuals and job description and personal profile to you (not the other way around), and don't worry about people misunderstanding or misreading or thinking it is something else or expecting something more or less, that will always happen and that very thing, in fact, proves to be the greatest opportunity to learn to communicate better and more clearly (at least for me).

the amazing thing is, that much of the fallout from my old church are still very much in fellowship with each other in less formal ways... we still play a big part in each others lives and many are now pretty well known in christendom, doing some radical stuff.

In many ways, this was a very good thing for me, because I stopped fainting first of all, and because it made me a lot less judgemental of people who choose to eat meat.