Sentences with phrase «way more money if»

They'll make more money in subsequent years, and way more money if they're at big firms.

You also know that you could have made way more money if you have invested even earlier.

Not exact matches

If you've got money and trust the pros to manage it, then this is one way to keep more dough in your pocket.

(Which by the way, may mean paying more taxes later if tax rates go up or you're making more money.)

If resorts no longer have the money to upgrade their lift capacity every year the way some people buy cars, they may have to improve the customer experience in other ways — for example, by limiting the number of tickets sold on any one day and steering more skiers to make mid-week reservations when the slopes are wide open.

«If you pay more attention to your money and the way it's organized, you'll be more organized, more responsible and more on top of your finances.»

Rather than just giving people money we should develop ways so that you can earn more money if you do certain things that are good for you and maybe good for society.

But even if that connection isn't made, the boom could certainly go the other way: Food franchises stand to make a lot of money as delivery becomes more popular.

This way, if you enjoy the happy surprise of earning more money than you anticipated, you can up your contribution and reduce your tax bill accordingly.

By the way if economies slow down, it would affect demand for all commodities but then Mr. Bernanke and his friends are going to print a lot more money.

Google has long impressed observers for its continued support of dozens of useful little web services that make no money, but Techcrunch wonders if more cuts are on the way, such as Google's Wikipedia competitor Knol and phone add - on Grand Central.

In the process of buying a mattress, you'll likely be pitched all kinds of different accessories to get, and if you don't go in with a clear idea of what you want, it's easy to fall victim to those pitches and spend way more money than you thought you would.

Listeners raise their hands and suggest ways that Pandora might outwit regulators; others volunteer to view more ads on their Pandora radio players if that will help the company make money.

And further... If they had invested that money in R&D - ing what people actually want, and progressive ways to deliver it, how much more ahead would they be?

But if you're a plutocrat bent on self - enrichment, there are more subtle, and more legal, ways to use the privileges of office to earn a lot more money.

I truly think if more people spent time thinking about ways to better invest their money, they will generate much greater wealth over time.

like, if your intent is just to create something epic, and money or selling your venture is an after thought, you are well on your way to creating something epic, that companies will be more than happy to gobble up your start up.

If you have a large sum to put into savings and want to see it grow faster, a money market account can be the best way to save more by doing nothing.

Either way though, they are still trading time for money, and if they'd like to earn more money, they'll most likely have to stick around work just a little bit longer.

More precisely, they do so in order to lend or invest most of the base money that comes their way, while keeping some on hand for the sake of either meeting their customers» requests for currency, or for settling accounts with other banks, as they must do at the end of each business day, if not more frequenMore precisely, they do so in order to lend or invest most of the base money that comes their way, while keeping some on hand for the sake of either meeting their customers» requests for currency, or for settling accounts with other banks, as they must do at the end of each business day, if not more frequenmore frequently.

But what if I told you there's a way to turn your least favorite money management... Read more

In the end, you will wind up paying more money if you don't tackle debt in the other ways described above, as outlined by Dave Ramsey's financial team.

I haven't been a very active «trader» in the past few years; I've started to focus more on low cost investing (if you're looking to save money on trading costs and get a $ 100 bonus to boot, OptionsHouse is the way to go - use link for promo code), the occasional market inefficiency trade (pairs trades, hedging -LSB-...]

By the way, if the pastor is into service for the money, he will get much more in the corporate world.

If we are given the option to make more money by going against our principles in any of these ways we must say, «No.»

not judging you or anyone vow to fight if you truly are a man of GOD truth would be spoken not the devious way you and the church handled it im more of a man than you will ever be guess you are afraid of losing all those members and money.

If we abolished the income & payroll taxes, we'd all bring home way more money, and presumably could swallow the higher sales taxes that would be enacted to compensate.

I lean towards the third view... but I admit it is the most difficult of the three views... Christ's priorities appear to be «love in motion» flowing in almost unpredictable directions as dictated by the greatest need: — He heals a slave rather than rebukes slavery; — He heals a man at a pool, then leads the man to belief, then says «cease from sinning»; — He heals many others and says «go and sin no more» to but a few; — He shares money with the poor but establishes no long - term aid; — He touches lepers; He converses with seeking Pharisees; He debates with other Pharisees; He lives with Samaritan outcasts for two days; — He acknowledges the five «marriages» of the Samaritan woman as «marriages»... and then remarks about her current co-habitation... but then moves to higher priorities; — He seems so very focused on internal holiness and not on external holiness; — He violates the Sabbath; He says He is Lord of the Sabbath; He even says that the Sabbath was created to assist man, rather than man created to serve the Sabbath... thus turning the entire concept of the Law into one of assistance rather than being chained to obedience; — He insists on impartiality in the way we bless others, even if we call them «evil» or «good».

I have heard «we need more money», «we need more staff», «we need more property», «we need more Bible studies» (which as you point out are rarely really Bible studies), «this is what you should believe», and «the Bible says» (which it rarely says what they say it says), and (implied) «it's our way or the highway» (as in, «if you don't entirely agree with us, then get out»).

He was as startled as anybody else at the way the election went, and it looks to him as if we are in for a lot more government spending and waste of the taxpayer's good money.

This is because of the innane way health insurance is paid for to get around wage freezes years ago, but the idea that this is the company's money makes no more sense than if the company wanted to dictate what brand of toothpaste you would buy with your salary.

Mastering The Art of Vegan Cooking: Over 200 Delicious Recipes and Tips to Save you Money and Stock Your Pantry is the newest publication from Annie and Dan Shannon, the duo behind the fun, welcoming, and warm vegan blog, Meet the Shannons, and if it had been published way back when we were first starting out, our transition to veganism would've likely been much more seamless.

That's why the Niners are so high — it's because a bunch of silly Niner fanboy money is on them to go all the way so they lower the odds to make it less enticing to bet more on them and / or decrease the payout if they do win the SB.

If you mean the owners should invest more money into the club to pay the players higher salaries (salaries are payroll) than the only way to that through equity (shares or rights issues).

If Arsenal are serious about winning the League and more then Mr Wenger's way of doing business has to stop he needs to spend MONEY.

If i could put money on Arsenal finishing a place lower or more for the next 5 seasons i would be taking out a second morgage and laughing all the way to the bank.

It would be nice if we could just give everyone more money, but unfortunately the economy doesn't work that way.

I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew

It seems to me that if they had gone into the UFC earlier, they'd have made WAY more money.

4) At this stage of the transfer window can a deal be made for such a player and if so will Arsenal show some willingness to complete a deal quickly and part ways with the a more than likely big amount of money?

I do nt think Man - U are interested in who we are after, we are looking for 10 Million pound man Man - U are looking for 100 million man, we should worry more about midd to bottom table clubs who now have money to spend thanks to the TV rights, if any descent player are linked with us is a media hipe or we offer way below asking price,

Although I've found it very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that things are going to get much worse before they get better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus on the head instead of the heart for now

If Nutting can't see a way for the Pirates to consistently succeed despite the fact that the organization is making money, not bleeding it, then someone who either doesn't mind spending additional cash or has more money to risk should be running the team.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

The subject of money is never far from the forefront of debate between Arsenal fans about whether Arsene Wenger and the board are running our great club the right way or if the resistance to the money way of throwing mountains of cash at things is nothing more than an excuse for being tight fisted and making lots of profit.

After the way Ozil has played this season and the way us Arsenal fans have been mugged again and again by the club and the players, i don't give a dam if Ozil goes, in fact i want him to go and if the club lose money then it'll be no more than Kroenke deserves.

We must learn from our mistakes but it's a shame with the way we are reacting.How many of you would put your money on AC Milan beating Bayern in the UCL if they lost 6 - 0 today.As far as am concerned from a neutral point of view I expected both Bayern and Chelsea to beat Arsenal.It's shocking our defeat has come as shock.Players are being played out of position and the teams we've played used far more stronger squads.

We can compete, but the only way we can do it is if we spend our money more wisely than they do — get higher quality per # spent.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

NPB's owners will likely have little issue with any changes to the system like the above, since their teams will get $ 20 million either way: They might, however, ask for more than $ 20 million as the maximum posting fee if it looks like Ohtani is going to get a paltry signing bonus but then sign a deal for much more total money than the Nippon Ham Fighters will receive from his new team.