Sentences with phrase «way more money selling»

As you can see there is a huge difference in the cost and if you're wondering if there is a selfish reason for us to promote this product you'll be relieved to find out that we would actually make way more money selling our clients a whole life policy but here at InsureChance our clients are family and you don't cheat your family.

Being an independent insurance agency we would make way more money selling our client's whole life insurance than any other product that we offer.

Not exact matches

If resorts no longer have the money to upgrade their lift capacity every year the way some people buy cars, they may have to improve the customer experience in other ways — for example, by limiting the number of tickets sold on any one day and steering more skiers to make mid-week reservations when the slopes are wide open.

«Although there was clearly demand for the un-activated iPhone X, selling it that way cost more money, causing some confusion with our customers and noise in the media,» a Best Buy spokeswoman told Bloomberg.

Apple sold just a few more iPhones than Wall Street expected but made way more money anyway.

like, if your intent is just to create something epic, and money or selling your venture is an after thought, you are well on your way to creating something epic, that companies will be more than happy to gobble up your start up.

More commonly, as the business became more profitable and the owner begins making more money, he will leave wages where they are, but try to find a way to cut down on overhead adn production costs (potentially at a loss of worker salary or through layoffs when outsourcing is utilized), and will pocket the increased profits until the business is positioned well enough to be sold to a larger conglomoration for a substantial payout that NONE of the workers will see a dimeMore commonly, as the business became more profitable and the owner begins making more money, he will leave wages where they are, but try to find a way to cut down on overhead adn production costs (potentially at a loss of worker salary or through layoffs when outsourcing is utilized), and will pocket the increased profits until the business is positioned well enough to be sold to a larger conglomoration for a substantial payout that NONE of the workers will see a dimemore profitable and the owner begins making more money, he will leave wages where they are, but try to find a way to cut down on overhead adn production costs (potentially at a loss of worker salary or through layoffs when outsourcing is utilized), and will pocket the increased profits until the business is positioned well enough to be sold to a larger conglomoration for a substantial payout that NONE of the workers will see a dimemore money, he will leave wages where they are, but try to find a way to cut down on overhead adn production costs (potentially at a loss of worker salary or through layoffs when outsourcing is utilized), and will pocket the increased profits until the business is positioned well enough to be sold to a larger conglomoration for a substantial payout that NONE of the workers will see a dime of.

But, manutd can offer way more money to d selling club and higher wages to d player den us.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Or rather, thanks for ruining our club by selling to that «snake and odious money mad but care nothing for trophies» KROENKE, thus paving the way for the awful Gazidis and much later to appointing the dreadfully arrogant and Dickensian Sir You've had your Chips KESWICK, WHO SO HATES TRUE FANS AND LOVES HIS HORSE RACING FAR MORE THAN ARSENAL.

However do agree with Stan on one thing, there are better ways to earn Mooney then football, Stan can now sell his shares and walk away with 1.5 billion or more GBP he can generate 10 % return on that money which is around 150 million GBP while his not earning anything now only the Value of the club is going up and i fear that what with the new prices and salaries of football players i can see a decline starting in a few years, so is he good for us in the future?

He is still young and more or less not going to have a problem playing every week at his present club, The new owner who is a Russian with plenty of money to spend on players has no need to sell and will spend the same sort of money we will and at moment the way Ithey are playing and the way we are they would have no trouble turning us over, We need to go back to grass roots which is what the majority want produce local talent and actually give them a chance in the first team, Play entertaining football all the time not respect the point (they will come if you play well) There is talent all over the world we need to find it, Howe is showing the way and in years to come may be a great England Manager but not for us right now and if I was him I would stay put

It's been interesting how some filmmakers have ended up using it as a great tool to enhance the atmosphere or the film itself (I can't see myself seeing Pina in 2D) instead of just a cheap gimmick or a quick way to make some money and I'm glad that Brian Singer isn't just using it to sell more.

Remember that every product you sell earns money you didn't have before, and more importantly, every product you sell saves fellow teachers» time and benefits children in ways that you can not begin to imagine.

No matter, it sold many more units (2153 total) and brought money McLaren's way (are you surprised to learn that a winning F1 racing effort burns up all the cash anyone can raise and more?).

No matter which of these models you choose, know that writing and selling your writing is an excellent way to make money on the Internet that can also lead to more opportunities in the future.

We keep offering better ways for publishing to sell more copies and make more money, and it seems to go unheard.

«Book Marketing Master Plan» will teach how to develop and implement an effective book marketing plan, with no money or optionally, very little money... which all LEADS TO SELLING WAY MORE BOOKS!

Filed Under: Publishing Tags: popularity, free ecourse platform, establishments, best place to sell an ecourse, build an ecourse with other peoples content, promote your ecourse, internet users, ways of making money, ways to make ecourses more interactive, platform for ecourses

We could care less what she sells them for and ironically, she makes more money that way too as we pay her a 10 % royalty on the invoice price, i.e. our revenue, whereas if she sells them she makes 50 %.

Just like I have the potential of making more money this way, an E-Publisher needs to sell fewer books than a traditional publisher to recoup its expenses and start making a profit.

More than just a way for someone to sell books without having to pay any taxes, though, some experts believe this is the ideal money laundering scam.

Selling more than 1,000 copies may seem like a big challenge at first, but at BookLaunchers, we'll walk you through the many ways to make money from your Book project.

Even if Amazon pays more to build the $ 79 Kindle than it sells it for, the company has several other ways to bring in money from the device.

Want to sell more books, make more money, and rule the world (in a nice and ethical way) with «The Lazy Writer's Guide to Pinterest.»

There's no way to lose money by printing more books than you sell, and publishers get paid much quicker on e-books as well.

BookShop is a free online storefront exclusive to BookBaby authors, giving them an easy way to earn more money selling their printed books and eBooks directly to readers.

Think about it: If you've already been paid for the book sold in the buy box — or you're not going to be paid because of the way the vendor acquired it — you're not going to make any more money on buy box books.

Instead, the way that successful authors get their wage premium is, first, they sell more books, and second, they sell different formats of books (hardcover or trade paper back) that for some reason the store is «allowed» to sell for more money.

Find ways to make more money, such as taking online surveys, selling stuff you don't need or getting a side job.

But find ways to make more money, be it working more hours, selling stuff or using some of your existing skills as some side income.

This is the IRS» way of saying that as long as all the proper guidelines are followed, a taxpayer selling investment property can use the money they would otherwise have paid in capital gains taxes to buy more investment property.

Ultimately, it's just a way for game companies to milk more money for the merchandise that's already been sold.

but in a way i sort of agree with you... i don't know how the gaming business works but it will be way easier focusing in one console (bugs and extra content) The PS4 and Xbox 1 are pretty different they might end up spending more money managing stuff between the two versions... oh and so far many people are hating the Xbox 1 so they might not sell many copies

Rather, it is now a way for publishers to extract more money from players by selling a game in parts.

Money pissed away in the wind that did not in any way make the game sell more (and arguably, didn't even make the game better).

«In addition to creating, marketing and selling designs for my own brands, Zazzle's referral program is a great way for my business to earn more money.

I don't want to start a big debate on vegetarianism vs. meat - eating, but right now there is way more than enough food being produced in the world; it's just that we grow crops that we feed to animals, and then we eat the animals (in many cases it's a way to make money — sell meat for a premium to the rich instead of selling tons of grain for a fraction of that price to starving people).

Up - selling should never be used simply as a way to make more money off of the client.

When you are selling your time, there are only three ways to make more money — higher rates, longer hours and more leverage.

Companies selling Term Insurance makes way more money than Whole Life Insurance.

With consumers holding more and more money in digital wallets, and with cryptocurrency expanding in new directions, many businesses are now finding ways to adopt cryptos into their cash flow, from artists selling albums for bitcoin, to companies like Brave Software's Basic Attention (BAT) which lets audiences pay for content creators.

Vizio, which has sold more than 11 million internet - connected TVs since 2010, and its data arm earns money by licensing people's TV viewing information in three main ways, according to a complaint from the agencies.

For years, microtransactions have become more and more prominent in gaming as a way of supplementing income for developers, or replacing the revenue gained by selling units — hence «free to play» games that are free to download and play, but make money by selling you small - ticket items or downloadable content in the game itself.

Everything you need to know about how to sell your car for more money or trade it in to a dealer and avoid common mistakes and risks along the way!

With the help of Barb Schwarz, founder of StagedHomes.com and author of Home Staging: The Winning Way to Sell Your House for More Money, we developed this quiz to boost your staging savvy.

Or, since for sale by owners don't have to follow the same rules, more will find a way that way with money from sellers paid under the table to Realtors who advise sellers on selling with the Realtors also bringing buyers.

The way a competent real estate professional sells a home for more money than a competitor, is by doing the job right!