If your matter goes through the court system then one party can be granted exclusive possession on a temporary basis by
way of a court order.
Financial claims can only be finalised by
way of a court order, either one made by the court of its» own volition or by the sanctioning of an agreement reached between the parties.
These are all valid rules which the courts can and will enforce by
way of a court order.
Not exact matches
That meant that even company employees could not see messages, phone calls, photos or videos sent across the WhatsApp network, and the company had no
way of complying with any
court order demanding access to those communications.
When an offender has satisfied all the terms and conditions
of a judge's
order — including incarceration, parole and probation, payment
of court costs and restitution — they have earned their
way back into the community.
But I can also see in watching, for instance, a real injustice in the
way the
court -
ordered defense attorney handled the confession
of the Avery nephew.
The only
way you can take anyone
of these peole to
court is if they threatened you and then gave you reasonable cause to believe they would actually carry it out, then the most you could do would be to get a restraining
order.
However, my hope and prayer is not that we're forced to by
court orders but that we desire, out
of our love for Jesus, to make this a priority and to make sure that we do respond to this very dark area
of our church in a very powerful and comprehensive
way.
Johnson's research, which is part
of the national study, found that the majority
of unwed fathers are involved in
ways not measured by
court -
ordered child support.
Having the agreement become part
of a
court order allows either parent a direct
way to enforce his or her parental rights.
To make matters worse, not even a
court order could sway the agency to desist from its abuse
of the constitution by
way of arbitrary detention
of the minister.
Unfortunately, the Government as the leading looter has put obstacles in our
way in enforcing the
orders of the
Court.
McDonald was in the CapTon studio this week for an interview on an unrelated matter (a hearing he had held on PTSD with his fellow vet, Sen. Lee Zeldin), and seemed unconcerned about the possibility that he might face a primary this fall (or, June 26, if the Senate GOP ever comes around to the Assembly Democrats»
way of thinking on moving the primary date to conincide with the
court -
ordered House and US Senate contests).
Consequently, the judge
ordered parties to file their applications by
way of writ
of summons before the
court.
Assemblyman Charles Barron,
of Brooklyn, known for his outspoken
ways, got up and began yelling during the governor's speech about the state's failure to obey a 10 year old
court order to fully fund schools, and increasing homelessness among other grievances.
Vacco explained that the
order sets up a process so that representatives
of both campaigns can be present for the counting, and allows for a structured
way to file objections to any special ballot with the
court.
The override vote came less than two weeks after U.S. District
Court Judge Shira Scheindlin's
order for a monitor to focus on stop - and - frisk, a practice she said the department had used in a
way that violated the rights
of hundreds
of thousands
of black and Hispanic men.
According to the judge, the
order was made through an ex-parte motion (without notice to other parties) and as such, there was no
way the
court would have listened to her own side
of the story.
Many couples Iâ $ ™ ve counseled fall into a rut
of using food as their primary
way of spending time together — going out to dinner, or for ice cream,
ordering pizza, making brunchâ $ ¦ Try mixing things up and plan activities that don't revolve around food (go to a play, art gallery or museum, or do something active, like hiking, biking, or indoor rock climbing), or involve healthy eating (visit a farmerâ $ ™ s market instead
of a food
court).
The validity
of our design relies on the idea that districts that experienced sudden increases in school spending right after the passage
of a
court -
ordered SFR were not already improving in other
ways in exactly those same years.
Alpha authorizers can show the
way by having the courage to tackle the politics associated with closing underperforming schools and knowing how to document the facts in
order to prevail in the
court of law and public opinion.
What our study does show is one
of the many possible
ways that politics can influence the implementation
of court -
ordered school - finance reform.
Tennessee's supreme
court ordered the state last week to find a more equitable
way to pay teachers, creating a quandary for lawmakers and the next governor that may cost the cash - strapped state hundreds
of millions
of dollars.
As for me, I will continue to stand with these visionary Compton parents all the
way to the Supreme
Court, if necessary, in
order to simply be able to use the laws
of the State
of California to advocate for the educational opportunities
of their children.»
A time
order is a
way of asking the
court to give you more time to pay, if you have fallen behind with the payments on your mortgage or secured loan.
The employees ask the
court to freeze all activity regarding WGM in
order to examine the state
of the firm and the appropriate
way to bring it back to healthy operations, in
order to keep the business alive and help secure the jobs
of its fifty employees.
As part
of a Chapter 13 action, in which the
court orders a repayment plan for the debtor to complete over several years, the second mortgage is stripped from the home and viewed in the same
way as unsecured debt, such as credit card and medical bills.
A «time
order» is a
way of asking the
court to give you more time to pay a loan agreement if you have fallen behind with the payments.
The
court wants to avoid fraudulent transfers —
ways of getting money out
of the bankruptcy estate in
order to keep it safe from creditors.
President Obama's constitutional law professor and mentor at Harvard, Laurence Tribe, calls Obama's attempt to flout the Constitution in
order to get his
way on the «Clean Power Plan» (CPP) a «trifecta» since it attempts to go around three major institutions
of government: Congress, the
courts, and the states.
After issuing a host
of «midnight regulations» on her
way out the door and despite a
court order directing that all records be preserved, Clinton EPA chief Carol Browner
ordered that her hard drive be erased on her last full day in office, January 19, 2001.
The
court stated by way of introduction that, «the issue of the standard of review applicable to orders of both judges and prothonotaries has been one of the most contentious issues before our Court and before all courts of appeal, including before the Supreme Court of Canada, in the last 10 to 15 years.&r
court stated by
way of introduction that, «the issue
of the standard
of review applicable to
orders of both judges and prothonotaries has been one
of the most contentious issues before our
Court and before all courts of appeal, including before the Supreme Court of Canada, in the last 10 to 15 years.&r
Court and before all
courts of appeal, including before the Supreme
Court of Canada, in the last 10 to 15 years.&r
Court of Canada, in the last 10 to 15 years.»
As I expect you probably once knew, but quite reasonably have chosen to forget, that provision for the Ontario Small Claims
Court is: «The Small Claims
Court shall hear and determine in a summary
way all questions
of law and fact and may make such
order as is considered just and agreeable to good conscience.»
The documents at issue were drawn up by the Legal Service not in connection with any pending cases and the Commission had only applied for leave to intervene, an application that was ultimately not granted because the cases were settled by
way of orders, thus logically implying that if the
court proceedings exception ever applied, it has by now ceased to do so.
If the English
Court made an
order for transfer
of a Scottish property (say, from both spouses to one
of them) then if one
of the spouses fails to comply with the
order by refusing the sign the transfer documents, there seems to be no easy
way to make that happen.
Siding with the Fourth, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits, the Supreme
Court held a federal court exercising its inherent authority to sanction bad faith conduct by ordering a litigant to pay the other side's legal fees is limited to awarding the fees the innocent party incurred solely because of the misconduct or — put another way — to the fees that party would not have incurred but for the bad f
Court held a federal
court exercising its inherent authority to sanction bad faith conduct by ordering a litigant to pay the other side's legal fees is limited to awarding the fees the innocent party incurred solely because of the misconduct or — put another way — to the fees that party would not have incurred but for the bad f
court exercising its inherent authority to sanction bad faith conduct by
ordering a litigant to pay the other side's legal fees is limited to awarding the fees the innocent party incurred solely because
of the misconduct or — put another
way — to the fees that party would not have incurred but for the bad faith.
The other
way a man is considered the legal father is if the
court issues an
order of filiation after the start
of a paternity proceeding.
By getting what he asked for, she's talking about the perpetrator receiving parenting time with the children with no
court -
ordered limitations or restrictions and possibly putting children in harm's
way at the hands
of the perpetrator.
The policy at issue in this case, was crafted in such a
way that in
order to engage the insurer's duty to defend, it required the communication, during the policy period, by a third party,
of an intention to hold the Jesuits responsible for damages.36 In this case, it was accepted by the parties, that if the claims were made within the temporal limits
of the Policy, the duty to defend would have been engaged as the claims allege injuries that would fall within the policy.37 In fact the
Court found one
of the claims was made within the policy period and therefore did trigger the insurer's duty to defend.38 The rest
of the claims however were found not to have been communicated during the policy period and, as a result, the insurer did not have a duty to defend the actions.39 The determination
of whether a policy will be «claims - made» or «occurrence based» will depend on many factors.
A cost effective
way to correct scheme rules: the High
Court made an
Order under section 48 Administration
of Justice Act 1985 authorising trustees to apply the scheme rules in a particular
way, on the basis it was clearly necessary to read certain words into the scheme rules to make sense
of them.
(4) A party to a direction made under this section may file it, excluding the reasons, in the prescribed form in the Superior
Court of Justice and it shall be entered in the same way as an order of that court and is enforceable as
Court of Justice and it shall be entered in the same
way as an
order of that
court and is enforceable as
court and is enforceable as such.
(8) A party to an interim or final
order may file it, excluding the reasons, in the prescribed form in the Superior
Court of Justice and it shall be entered in the same way as an order of that court and is enforceable as
Court of Justice and it shall be entered in the same
way as an
order of that
court and is enforceable as
court and is enforceable as such.
In relation to an award by an employment tribunal or sum due under an ACAS settlement, the High
Court and County Courts Jurisdiction (Amendment) Order 2009 (SI 2009/577) will allow beneficiaries to enforce by way of execution against goods in either the High Court or county court where the sum involved is less than # 5
Court and County
Courts Jurisdiction (Amendment)
Order 2009 (SI 2009/577) will allow beneficiaries to enforce by
way of execution against goods in either the High
Court or county court where the sum involved is less than # 5
Court or county
court where the sum involved is less than # 5
court where the sum involved is less than # 5,000.
102 A party to a direction made under section 100 or 101 may file it, excluding the reasons, in the prescribed form in the Superior
Court of Justice and it shall be entered in the same way as an order of that court and is enforceable as
Court of Justice and it shall be entered in the same
way as an
order of that
court and is enforceable as
court and is enforceable as such.
Lord Justice Wilson rejected these arguments: the judge «was bound to interfere» with the
order below; and the
way in which he did so «could not reasonably be challenged in [the
Court of Appeal]».
The CJC says there is growing concern about the
way such injunctions are being sought and / or used; the powers afforded to the
courts (principally the county
court, although the youth
court can grant civil injunctions against juveniles); the limited powers available to the county
court on breach; whether third parties should be involved in the process, and whether breaches
of these
orders are then a shortcut to mandatory possession
orders.
The divorce decree is a nullity and any
orders made by the county
courts since transfer be they by
way of custody, ancillary relief or otherwise are equally worthless.
... in
order to provide the users
of our
court with real access to justice we must make available to them a variety
of ways for communicating with the
court, including electronic communications.
In this
way, the powerless (society) will stop watching those programmed to wreck everything (lawyers and their clients repeated failures to comply with
court orders and few consequences) and undertake to participate in stopping the cycle (provided there was no legally valid reason for it to be wrecked in the first place)
of «wreck» vs. «fix - it.»
Last September, we told you about the retired New York Supreme
Court judge who found an unusual
way to keep himself busy in his retirement years — recruiting prostitutes to service members
of the fraternal group the Royal
Order of Jesters.