Sentences with phrase «way of thinking seems»

To my way of thinking it seems pretty basic.

The popular way of thinking seems to be the best editors charge the highest prices and if you're not paying through the nose then you're not getting the best possible result.

Their way of thinking seemed natural, inevitable.

The ways of thinking seem more visual and intuitive but solidly based in observation.

Not exact matches

I understand that it might seem downright scary thinking of moving all the way from Level 0 all the way to Level 5 with your employees.

For all these groups, the IQ boost from self - affirmation seems to come from calming worries around failure and stigma that can get in the way of clear thinking.

I think you've misconstrued the «zip» merging concept, it is not just who is in front but a one on one concept where the person who is in front has right of way then the person opposite and back and forth, one from right then one from left and so on, this works all over North America but seems to have been a missed import to Australia.

Driving a car without a license plate might seem like an extreme way to save time, but it is also a level of strategic thinking that most people never embrace.

That's the problem that can't be solved by treaties — people in Munich don't seem think of people in Rhodes in the same way that people in Ohio think of Nevadans.

Yes, there are a number of things out there that you can put numbers to, but it's not as clean - cut as I think we'd hope it would be, even if it can seem that way at first glance.

While initially, this may not seem to be the most useful content marketing feature, think of the app as enabling you to leave feedback the way a professor writes on your term paper.

The thought that any entrepreneurial enterprise could be traitorous seems far - fetched, but it is precisely the dilemma faced by business leaders that stand in the way of the government's demands.

It might seem like just another deal to add to the list, but it's crucial for a company that thinks it has figured out a new — arguably better — way of producing a seemingly boring condiment.

To me, building a better mousetrap seems a very strange way to think of entrepreneurship.

To some, the thought of customers making a business — especially a large business — change in any significant way seems unlikely.

For a while there, it seemed as if we'd got over this way of thinking.

But, with the benefit of hindsight, I think the likelihood of the court finding against the way the federal government was going about trying to create a national securities regime should have begun to seem likely very early this year, when British Columbia decided to adopt a nuanced opposition to the federal position.

Because of the industry's early ways of marketing, people thought cell phones were free, when in essence the manufacturers hid behind the carriers, making wireless providers charge more in monthly fees so that their $ 700 phones would seem cheap.

Surprisingly, analysts continue to hail lower - than - expected CPI inflation as giving the PBoC room and encouragement to expand credit — largely I guess because this is what analysts say when US or European CPI inflation numbers are low, and although most of us haven't thought through the differences between China and the US in the ways prices respond to monetary policy, we don't want to seem like we don't know what we are doing.

It seemed like The Eiffel Tower or Paris» finest restaurants werent enough to distract them from a brilliant idea trapped under the grey clouds, because next thing you know, these two «uber» kids were already brainstorming, thinking about ways to solve this global issue of finding cars at the right place, on the right time.

If this type of fund seems a bit too risky, the opposite to this way of thinking is index funds.

After listening to that episode, I began thinking more and more about angel groups and how that seems like a really easy way to have a cohort that you run deals by and also have the same decision autonomy of doing it lone wolf style.

Your continual denial of bias shows you have no desire to interpret any data in an objective way, but can be expected to use whatever data comes in to confirm your biases, so I don't understand why you bother asking for evidence besides the fact that you seem to think magic is possible or that we are in a «matrix» computer program.

This is so sad and empty, letting «pride» stand in the way through life, and yes, I too think that religions seem to take us further away from each other, with all of its rules and standards, is just a waste and it divides us when it should be bringing us closer to our spirituality of real life, but religions do not do this it takes us far from each other or it just puts up a pretense.

I am not the most religious of people, but I do believe in God, and Jesus... but many people seem to forget that God's SON sacrificied himself for our sins... in my book, a SON is part of a FAMILY... God put us on this earth to be of free will and to make our own way... Love being the biggest part of that way... we love God and we love Jesus... but we are also all part of his FAMILY... He made us all to be part of a unit that has hope and faith and love... we were meant to procreate... so what does it matter if a person who is dying does not automatically think of God, but of their loved ones?

It may be, however, that the opponents of his way of thinking, who seem to have the upper hand in the church leadership, are a step ahead of that complaint.

b) yes, repentance and restoration are the underlying goal (as seen in the exile from Eden at the outset — we are looking for a way back to life fully restored to God), but you seem to think Christians DISAGREE with that notion... which makes me think you haven't read much of the NT.

If I think of answered prayer as a message telegraphed direct to my heart, if I have no sense of the breadth of God, the ways in which God talks to me, then I have only a rudimentary sense of prayer, for, as Gadamer shows, God is talking to me all the time and I don't seem to know it.

I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i seeWAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i sSeems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i seeway of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i seeway that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i sseems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...

But I suppose that, to a religious person who's been indoctrinated to believe their ideology is the only true one and has been brainwashed into thinking that it's their obligation to «save» others by bringing them into their way of thinking, somebody standing up to that might seem like that person is pushing their beliefs on them, but they'd still be wrong.

What cracks me up is the religious attack our science... we have their god pushed all the way back to TBB... they seem to lose track of the fact that their beliefs are based on, at minimum 1350 year old thinking (quaran) and somehow ancient philosophy can trump The Big Bang and the solid science that its based on.

Think of some of the most liberated souls you know about, doing old things gloriously in a new way, or doing new things that only lately seemed impossible — great musicians, artists, athletes, scientists — what is their secret?

The point about all these pontifications, I thought at the time, whether over the airwaves or in the print media, either by secular commentators or by the kind of Catholics the liberal media like to give a platform to because their views on the Catholic tradition are so similar to their own (it seemed by the beginning of the conclave that it had all been going on for ever) was — or so I reflected then in my simple way — that this wonderful free - for - all was the only chance for many of them to be heard at all on this subject.

I think one of the big ones that a lot of us have experienced first - hand is the way that «hipster Christianity» can seem alienating.

Tobit's declaration that funding one's heavenly treasury is the only sure way to secure hope for a day of distress seems to be little more than wishful thinking.

While I tend to agree with the views posted by Cpt Obvious, Tim, dandintac, et al, I do admire that you are presenting your point of view in a personal manner and seem to have put some actual thought into it and you recognize that not everyone will have the same experience as you, and you don't condemn others for not feeling the same way (although it does make me wonder what your thoughts are on eternal torment for non-believers).

This discussion seems to have moved from a discussion on 1 Corinthians 9 (which could be used in a wrong way) to the issue of whether those lead a church should be paid so I offer the above thoughts to restore some balance.

For others, it's a nagging thought — as you work out your faith on your own, you keep coming back to this Jesus, and you can't make sense of him all the way, but you also can't accept everything he says because it seems somehow too hard to live that way, or too complex, or too simple, or merely out of your grid of experience.

The pope's statement seems to have been a hastily conceived attempt to communicate a degree of relaxation in respect of certain aspects of Church teaching — overlooking that these hints would happily be passed on to the world by a media delighted to report that the pope had finally come around to their way of thinking.

For example, by way of a modest proposal, process thought seems singularly well equipped to develop a theology of work, in the full Marxist sweep of the term: man's self - creativity in society.

Funny how we criticize and mock other countries that have governments based on religious fanaticism (i.e. Iran) while a large segment of our voters are also religious fanatics who seem to think their view is the only «morally correct» way to feel about an issue (i.e.abortion).

I think we live our life «IN» Christ, and He in us, this seems to be the only way «the ecklesia» can fellowship, Jesus working in me, living thru me, and Him living thru you, then when we come together, we can share out of our «Experience» of God.

In fact, the way most of those who seem to support her attempt to do so would (I would think) offend her and she would tell them to sit down and shut up because they make her look stupid.

I think that Paul is appealing to the character of God, that He is good and just and fair, and loving, and that when things do not seem that way from our point of view, we need to try to understand what God is doing in light of His character.

You seem to have highlighted particular sins as though some are worse than others all sin leads to death not just the big ones because we all are sinners.All have gone astray none are righteous.I believe the worst sin is pride idolatry is the first commandment we set ourselves as Gods.Regardless of what the sin is, our hearts are condemned by our pride.It wasnt the sin of homosexuality or sexual deviance that destroyed sodom.It was there pride and it is one of our biggest stumbling blocks in our christian walk or it certainly was for me.We look at the story of the adulterous woman and we think adultery is a terrible crime but the story is for our benefit to show that we all are sinners that Jesus does nt condemn us but came to save us.And when Jesus says go and sin no more he was not only talking to the woman but everyone else that was around judging her for her sin its a universal message that we all need to see that we all are condemned because of our sin that Jesus came to save us and that we turn from our sin and follow him.Because he is the way the truth and the life.brentnz

But this way of thinking about the normal patterns and tensions of family life makes it seems like the evils of «the world» have invaded «the Christian home.»

At the centre of it all lies this alien, eschatological Gospel, completely out of touch, as it seems, with our ways of thought.

Here's something I've been thinking about the last couple days — why does all of this seem like a constant one - way conversation?

In these quite different ways, something is being said about a refreshment or enablement which is provided for human existence; and something is also being said, even in a fashion which sometimes seems curiously negative (as in Indian religious thought and observance), about a relationship with a more ultimate and all - inclusive reality that establishes a kind of companionship between our own little life and the greater circumambient divine being.

I don't see this development as a sign that evangelicalism as a whole is on the decline (we seem to be holding strong with a decades - long 20 - to - 25 percent of the population), but I do believe it provides us with the opportunity to revise the way we think about political engagement and ready ourselves for a future of similar electoral choices.