Not exact matches
Though many do not see the necessity
of buying gold and silver right now, by this time next year in 2016, we believe that the necessity
of understanding the best
ways to buy gold and silver will be
self - evident by that time.
Only in productive work and learning processes can their individualism be broken down in such a
way that it is transformed from morally based (that is to say as individual as ever)
self - sacrifice to a new kind
of political
self understanding and behavior.
God wants humanity to
understand that nothing and nobody is beyond the scope
of His redemptive purposes, and so by sending Jesus as the fulfillment
of the most violent
of religious texts, God not only revealed Himself by
way of a stark contrast to that violence, but also showed how to reinterpret and
understand those violent events in light
of the
self - sacrificial God dying on the cross for the sins
of the whole world.
Thomas Day is writing about the culture
of American Christianity and what it does to our
understanding of God,
self, and community — as reflected in the
way Christians worship.
Just because we are so very ignorant
of the big picture and often only want to see it in our own egotistical
self centered
way, does not mean it has a lot to answer for; it only means we need to grow up and try to
understand the big picture more than we usually do.
Some may wish to use it as an historical book; after all, it is a collection
of writings bound up together in one volume, telling us
of the
way in which the Jewish people came by God's
self - disclosure to a deeper
understanding of the God they worshipped and a more adequate conception
of his purpose for his «chosen» race.
Only when the decision is made as a matter
of deliberate policy can the school's
ways of relating to its immediate situation truly be governed by its overarching end, be open to
self - criticism, and become an integral part
of the effort to
understand God truly.
Further, they should be able to
understand the loving and unique significance
of conjugal intercourse, which lies not mainly in the pleasure it may give the spouses, but in the unparalleled
way by which it expresses the total and exclusive
self - gift they made to one another in marrying.
The overarching goal to
understand God must also shape the
ways in which all the school's practices are institutionalized so that
self - criticism is an institutionalized feature
of those practices.
If any members
of the Church including also individual bishops were to demand that the Church should alter her constitution in a
way contradicting her dogmatically defined
self -
understanding, such movement in favour
of change would actually no longer take place within the Church but outside, for those demanding such a change could no longer belong to the Church in the full sense
of a visible society.
This seems to be the
way Locke interpreted his own philosophical innovation — famously trading our equality under God in the 2nd chapter
of the 2nd Treatise for equality via individual autonomy
understood as
self - ownership in the 5th chapter.
Stories that define a community different from the world around us because
of the
way these stories shape our
self -
understanding, a community that may sometimes be wildly radical politically and on other issues seem conservative, but will not let anyone else's vision set its agenda.
Illustrative
of this fact is the
way a study
of Buddhism can enrich our
understanding of the human
self and God.
It does not easily occur to us that this may be a
way of speaking
of one's
self -
understanding.
An
understanding of revelation as the gift
of an ever - more - inclusive future rooted in the kenotic love
of God can help transform the Church's
self -
understanding in a
way that would make it more closely related to the needs
of our contemporary world.
(Originally they did not conceive
of themselves as starting or belonging to a new religion, since this was not even a formal concept in their
self -
understanding, but as followers
of the hodos, or the «
way.»)
Others among the Sufis held fast to shari`a, but
understood it in
ways which were much wider and more liberal than the interpretation
of the orthodox, looking upon the law as either a system
of self - discipline or as a set
of symbols representing hidden religious meanings.
To compare the several structures
of existence with each other, it is necessary to employ terms foreign to the
self -
understanding of some
of them and even to use terms employed by them in
ways not identical with their own usage.
well just thinking about these wars in the muslim / mid-east world over religious differences (which may reflect mental states in many
ways) in a world where most realize that living in the present moment is best
way to happiness and being in the moment in non-strife and awareness through the teachings
of masters such as found in the buddhist, taoist, zen, etc., etc., etc. spriritually based practices
of religious like thought and teachings, etc. that to ask these scientifically educated populace whom have access to vast amounts
of knowledges and
understandings on the internet, etc. to believe in past beliefs that perhaps gave basis and inspiration to that which followed — but is not the end all
of all times or knowledges — and is thus — non
self - sustaining in a belief that does not encompass growth
of knowledge and
understanding of all truths and being as it is or could be — is to not respect the intelligence and minds and personage
of even themselves — not to be disrespected nor disrespectful in any
way — only to point out that perhaps too much is asked to put others into the cloak
of blind faith and adherance to the past that disregards the realities
of the present and the potential
of the future... so you try to live in the past — and destroy your present and your future — where is the intelligence in that — and why do people continually fear monger or allow to be fear — mongered into this destructive vision
of the future based upon the past?
Sexual fulfillment is so important to contemporary
understandings of self - actualization and identity that anything standing in its
way instantly becomes hateful and unacceptable.
If Jesus thus employed a familiar
way of speaking, not just casually but in circumstances which made it the vehicle
of a partly veiled assertion
of his vocation, then «Son
of Man» came to be something like a
self - designation replacing the traditional title
of «Messiah» That is how the writers
of the gospels seem to have
understood it.
Whereas Feuerbach
understood the consciousness
of God as man's consciousness
of himself, Marx investigates the nature
of the man who can develop the
self - consciousness only in an alienated
way.
The «relatin rationis»
of God to all created events in the universe is another
way of stating this noncoercive Divine Presence or Mystery grounding all cosmic and human actualities, beckoning human freedom towards noncoercive world and
self understanding and acting.
The major consideration must be the nature
of the
self, but briefly we
understand the whole person in the following
way.
Both saw that some human pain and torment are punitive, that some trouble is disciplinary was taken for granted, that in one
way or another the cosmic process should not in the end be ethically unsatisfactory, that the whole experience
of suffering remained mysterious, but that the climactic element in the New Testament's contribution to the
understanding of suffering is to be found in its treatment
of vicarious
self - sacrifice.
Tim i found it liberating to just do what the Lord wants you to do i work within his boundarys and yes i attend church and enjoy it.I love the people and i love hearing the word and worshipping the Lord even if others are still bound up with traditions thats not my walk thats theres.My focus is to do what the Lord wants me to do.There have been times i have said no to the pastor he does nt
understand why i choose not to lead the worship.i query him as well regarding the idea that its not just performing a function because there is a need our hearts have to be in the right place so that the Lord can use us but he did nt
understand where i was coming from and thats okay because
of that i just said no until my heart is right i am better not being involved in leading.But i am happy to be an encouragement to others in the worship team i havent wanted to be the leader i have done that in the past.So my focus has been just the singing and being part
of different worship teams i think the Lord has other plans as the groups i am in seem to be changing at the same time i am aware that i do nt to worry about change as the Lord knows whats best.I used to be quite comfortable leading the music but that was before when i was operating in my own
self confidence and pride.The Lord did such a huge change in my life that i lost my
self confidence and that is not a bad thing at all as my spiritual growth has been incredible.The big change was my identity moved from me and what i could do to knowing who i was in Christ and that he is my strength and confidence.Now i know that without him i can do nothing in fact i am dependent on his empowerment through his holy spirit all the time in everything.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music at another church i attend multiple churchs although i attend two regularly one has services in the morning and one has services in the evening so the two do nt really clash.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music its been two years since i did that and i was worried on how i would go.All i can say is that it went really well and because i stepped out in Faith the Lord really blessed the morning to the congregation.The difference is knowing that i serve the Lord with the gifts he has given me but my heart has to be right and when i do it in his
way it builds up the body and it brings glory to him.May the Lord continue to show you what he wants you to do even though others may not
understand your reasons i just want you to know that you do nt have to pull away completely just work within the boundarys that the Lord gives you and do nt feel pressured by others expectations to do anything that feel uncomfortable.Be involved just as you feel lead by the holy spirit even if it is in a very minor
way take small steps.regards brentnz
If the Trinity is not to be
understood tritheistically, the generation
of the Logos from the Father is God's
self - expression, whereby God's nature is articulated in
ways at least partially accessible to discursive reason.
It is hard to think one's
way back to the times before Vatican II, before ecumenical and
self - critical Catholicism, before non-Catholic awareness
of intra-Catholic conflict and the like, to reconstruct a plausible basis for such
understandings.
Almost a century and a half after Clement
of Rome, Clement
of Alexandria and his brilliant student Origen were
self - consciously affirming, not that Christianity was like paideia, not that it could simply make use
of received paideia, but that Christianity is paideia, given by God in Jesus Christ, turning on a radical conversion possible only by the Holy Spirit's help, and taught only indirectly by study
of divinely inspired Scriptures in the social context
of the church
understood to be in some
ways a school.
Certainly one
of the indisputable offices
of theology is to open the mind
of the present community to the
way in which the primitive Church apprehended the event that became the focus
of its
self -
understanding.
Gay and lesbian persons respond by offering, from their experience, a variety
of ways of imagining not only their own
self -
understanding, but the
way we are called to be Church.
Not exclusively,
of course, but in a singular
way related to her
self -
understanding.
Yet I argue that participation in initiatives to restore a civil society in America, with appropriate reflective
self -
understandings, could meet the needs and activate the worldly spirituality
of precisely those millions
of middle -
of - the - road citizens looking for the sorts
of moral meanings, the kinds
of religious roots, these communities used to represent and in some
ways still do.
That God's love, manifest in diverse
ways throughout the duration
of the universe, might come to a full and unsurpassable
self - expression in an individual human being who lived and died in the Middle East almost two thousand years ago does not seem incongruous with what we now
understand about the nature
of an evolving universe, especially if we regard religion as a phenomenon emergent from the universe rather than just something done on the earth by cosmically homeless human subjects.
In some
ways all
of this remains quite abstract because the notions
of sinner and creature still sound more like
self -
understanding than characteristics
of a craft.
The
way to an answer leads through the mystery
of self - giving and the paradox
of the Gospel as we try to
understand the relation
of the love
of God to the human loves.
We can
understand many ills
of the spirit and even
of the body as caused by the damming up
of the
way to a life
of free and
self - giving love.
It had made him devote the rest
of his life, at the cost
of immense risk and suffering, to the one task
of spreading the good news: that God had said «Yes» to Jesus; thus his
way of life had been vindicated; that what he did and said had been true after all; that love,
understanding, forgiveness,
self - sacrifice are the real things that matter in the end.
We must develop an
understanding of the Word which takes into account the
ways in which all these literary forms convey sense to our
self - reflection.
The particular
way constancy
of character is emphasized implies a substantialist view
of the
self and an essentialist
understanding of Christianity.
In that
way the role
of creator may be
understood as shared between God and past occasions along with the
self - creation
of the new occasion.
It took the destruction
of the people
of Korah by Almighty God to make Israel
understand that it was God who had appointed Moses to lead them and that
self - made leaders such as Korah would not work in the
way of delivering Israel another country.
At the heart
of Hampson's misreading is her reduction
of Lutheranism to a dialectic between two
ways of understanding the relation between
self and God.
Before we can explain why persons might be persuaded by Christian theism rather than, say, Romantic harmony with nature or Nietzsche's defiant assertion
of the
self's powers, we have to
understand how any
of those systems could articulate
ways that persons actually live.
Glendon and Weigel
understand the sundry worlds
of moral purpose and
self - interest that must be addressed in more imaginative
ways.
Instead
of thinking out the full metaphysical implications
of the basic
understanding to which they have come in reflecting on the meaning
of faith and justice for our
self -
understanding and praxis, they have either settled for talking merely about the meaning
of ultimate reality for us or else taken over traditional metaphysical
ways of talking about the structure
of ultimate reality in itself that are doubtfully consistent with their own basic
understanding.
Yet with our
understanding of the
way that life is involved with life,
of the manner in which
self and society are bound together,
of the
way in which small groups within a nation act for the whole, it seems that we must move toward a conception similar to the Hebraic and medieval one.
But that's not how Ellis was
understood by most, and there is a direct line to be drawn between the Ellis article and the
self - conscious if tacit defensiveness
of the Land O» Lakes statement, which seemed to say, yes, we're second - rate, maybe even third - rate, and the
way to be first - rate is to be like Harvard, Yale, Stanford, and the rest
of what would be called, in twenty - first - century Catholic academic jargon, «aspirational peers.»
And just as in human contacts the new
understanding created by encountering another in love and trust is kept pure only when it permanently retains its connection with the other who is encountered, so too the
self -
understanding granted by faith never becomes a possession, but is kept pure only as a response to the repeated encounter
of the Word
of God, which proclaims the act
of God in Christ in such a
way as continually to represent it.
He
understands and appreciates us, but he has an uncanny
way of sniffing out our
self - righteousness and hypocrisy.