I'm in
no way questioning her judgment.
Not exact matches
That
question is being answered in many different
ways in this generation, but the final
judgment on sexual action is what it means for the fulfilment of persons now and throughout life.
Part of the problem the
way the
question is posed is by assuming that we can abstract an ethical ideal from one part of scripture and use it to judge the actions of God in another part of scripture, as though scripture were given us so we could form such dehistoricized abstract ethical
judgments!
As I have argued in these pages and elsewhere, the «presumption,» by detaching the just war
way of thinking from its proper political context» the right use of sovereign public authority toward the end of tranquillitas ordinis, or peace» tends to invert the structure of classic just war analysis and turn it into a thin casuistry, giving priority consideration to necessarily contingent in bello
judgments (proportionality of means, discrimination or noncombatant immunity) over what were always understood to be the prior ad bellum
questions («prior» in that, inter alia, we can have a greater degree of moral clarity about them).
«I think if we change that step and really become students of each other's narratives and ask
questions about why people perceive certain things in a certain
way instead of jumping to
judgment, then I think we'll be better equipped to have more diversity in local churches.»
And, oh, when the hour - glass has run out, the hourglass of time, when the noise of worldliness is silenced, and the restless or the ineffectual busyness comes to an end, when everything is still about thee as it is in eternity — whether thou wast man or woman, rich or poor, dependent or independent, fortunate or unfortunate, whether thou didst bear the splendor of the crown in a lofty station, or didst bear only the labor and heat of the day in an inconspicuous lot; whether thy name shall be remembered as long as the world stands (and so was remembered as long as the world stood), or without a name thou didst cohere as nameless with the countless multitude; whether the glory which surrounded thee surpassed all human description, or the
judgment passed upon thee was the most severe and dishonoring human judgement can pass — eternity asks of thee and of every individual among these million millions only one
question, whether thou hast lived in despair or not, whether thou wast in despair in such a
way that thou didst not know thou wast in despair, or in such a
way that thou didst hiddenly carry this sickness in thine inward parts as thy gnawing secret, carry it under thy heart as the fruit of a sinful love, or in such a
way that thou, a horror to others, didst rave in despair.
More recently, in 1996 when this journal pointedly addressed judicial usurpation in a
way that raised the
question of the legitimacy of the political order as it presently functions, Commentary reacted with alarm to the suggestion that all polities and parties are subject to transcendent moral
judgment.
Stated formally, we may put the
question this
way: On what grounds are we to base our
judgments of value and thus our moral, social and political decision - making?
If the answer to the first
question is no, then we may say that no
judgment of the form, «I ought to act in a certain
way,» is warranted.
The interviewers try to divine the answer by asking
questions that would test in some
way the principles of
judgment, or the understanding of «jurisprudence,» that command the respect of the judge.
Now when the guilty are so numerous it is not humanly possible to do this, therefore one must give the whole thing up, one perceives that there can be no
question of any
judgment, they are too numerous to be judged, one can not make them or in any
way manage to make them individuals, so one must give up holding
judgment.
The back - and - forth of crafting a law able to command a large majority reflects the correct
judgment that, in the early twenty - first - century secular West, no one
way of approaching the
question of death and dying can command universal assent.
A sure
way to get one's own
judgment and authority
questioned or undermined, by the press and departmental employees, even if the appointee was scrupulous about it.
«She has now resumed her unpaid position as part of this panel after serving her sentence, which in no
way brought into
question her ability or
judgment as an economist,» the source said.
I also worry that arriving at a
judgment about Weiner or Spitzer — as if they were groveling exes — is
way too compelling a
question, compared to differentiating a crowded field of Democratic mayoral hopefuls, or learning the first thing about Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer.
The AG solves the
question on whether the ECB has therefore exceeded its powers by indirectly adopting economic policy measures by
way of adding a condition to his final
judgment, namely that no excess of power had taken place: The ECB must refrain from any direct involvement in the financial assistance programmes to which the OMT program is linked.
Her continued stance that she was under no duty to do reveal the relationship or that it posed a problem called into
question her
judgment as a head teacher which opened the
way for the school to dismiss her.
Similarly, the Dickson biography declares that although two specific decisions were reported as «By the Court»
judgments, Dickson's own papers put it beyond doubt that Dickson himself wrote the reasons in
question — but, again, there is no discussion of why the impersonal label was used at all, no indication of why Dickson did not assume individual responsibility in the usual
way, no hint of a broader practice or policy.
Specifically, the
question was whether a claim to enforce a foreign
judgment is a claim to «enforce an order of a court or any other order that may be enforced in the same
way as an order of a court» (under section 16 (1)(b)-RRB-.
In his
judgment, Lord Mance deals with the
question of the report and suggests several
ways in which the report could have been admitted but concludes that none of these were adopted.
The
judgment of Lord Justice Rimer in the instant case is a full one, tracing the twists and turns in the case law, from the fons et origo on one - man companies (Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961] AC 12, [1960] 3 All ER 420), through the policy - driven phase (that the secretary of state's guarantee was, in effect, meant only for «real» employees) as exemplified in Buchan v SSE [1997] IRLR 80, and then to SSTI v Bottrill [2000] 1 All ER 915, [1999] IRLR 326, where the Court of Appeal had not followed Buchan and had instead held that it was a
question of fact, but in such a
way as (the Court of Appeal now accepted) had led to uncertainty of application.
While it is true that
judgments based on statutes will be binding only while the relevant parts of that statute is in force, I suppose my
question deals with the scenario where judges would prefer to rule in a certain
way, however are unable to do so because of statutes that haven't been amended to reflect changing community values, and they do not want to set a precedent in the meantime.
In deciding if these powers should be used to weed out a claim as having no chance of success or be used to resolve all or part of an action, the motion judge must ask the following
question: can the full appreciation of the evidence and issues that is required to make dispositive findings be achieved by
way of summary
judgment, or can this full appreciation only be achieved by
way of a trial?
«Although it is unlikely that there will be further attempts to rely upon TUPE in this
way,» he says, «the Court of Appeal is due to give
judgment in Power v Regent Security Services Ltd on the
question of whether an employee can rely upon the terms in his original contract of employment.»