I refer you to my previous observations about
the way science works.
It's not bad or wrong, it's just not
the way science works.
I can not think of anyone who has done more to disinform about, sabotage, undermine and vandalize
the way science works.
Other accusations were based not on selective misquotation but on a misunderstanding of
the way science works.
No, that isn't
the way science works.
«What Martin Durkin and Channel 4 don't understand is
the way science works.
Chief, You are forgetting
the way science works.
This is
the way science works.
My climate enemies have done scientific and other academic frauds; they've destroyed, withheld and pretended to misplace scientific data in order to prevent the human race discovering things about nature; they've forged documents to frame people they don't like; mendaciously and publicly accused innocent people of deplorable crimes that carry prison sentences; betrayed the trust reposed in their professions by fraudulently abrogating to themselves the magical competence to diagnose entire swathes of the (perfectly healthy) population with thought disorders just to score points in an academic bitch fight; deliberately and self - servingly lied to * massive * audiences about
the way science itself works — than which I can't for the life of me think of a greater crime against humanity in the recent history of the developed world, can you Joe?
Dr Allen said: «What Martin Durkin and Channel 4 don't understand is
the way science works.
That's
the way science works.
I don't think we should be scared of admitting that we just don't know, if indeed we just don't know (which I believe is a fair reflection of the state of the science)... I do not believe that Fu et al. weightings is some panacea nor that the «cancellation» works on all space and timescales (the statement needs to be * proved * it can not be accepted as an article of faith — that is not
the way science works).
The way science works is that you publish and if someone has an issue they do their own analysis and publish that and science debates and progresses.
This is
the way science works, and I'm looking forward to a constructive discussion.
This is a judgement call but it is
the way science works.
The Oxburgh Panel operated, and wrote their report, entirely independently and so we can not answer for the precise form of words used, but it does seem entirely consistent with
the way science works.
That's not
the way science works.
Because that is not
the way science works.
That is
the way science works.
Although the questions about dinosaurs keep piling up as more is discovered, Makovicky is confident of
the way science works: Eventually, questions like the ones in the article on the following pages will lead to astounding answers.
«That's
the way science works,» Droxler said.
«That's
the way science works.»
When I provide a postulate, it stands as fact unless one of the supporting premises is shown to be false — much like
the way science works.
«This exciting discovery is the product of a strong collaborative effort from the entire DES team,» said Basilio Santiago, a DES Milky
Way Science Working Group coordinator and a member of the DES - Brazil Consortium.
Not exact matches
In fact, she and others who met at GOSH are currently
working on an «open source hardware manifesto» to publish in the coming months that will detail some specific
ways repurposed objects can play a bigger role in
science and tech projects.
The
way it
works in Israel, you're supposed to go into the Army first, and they have a computer
science division, I would have done that.
One
way that Trump could improve the
work visas would be to encourage more U.S. citizens to pursue STEM (
science, technology, engineering, and math) careers.
And then to try to link academic
work that's basic
science to that — if you're going to down the Russia line I think we have to go down the UK line and the US line in the same
way.
Cambridge Analytica, a data
science company that
worked for President Trump's campaign, announced Tuesday that it has suspended chief executive Alexander Nix after a British television station aired secretly recorded video that appeared to show him talking about entrapment as a
way to win campaigns.
Just clarifying your faith structure... matter, which can neither be created nor destroyed but only change forms (according to
science), somehow just appeared in some form and
worked its
way to complex life.
science has mountains of evidence and mountains of proof pointing to the
way things began and the
way things
work.
Imagine where
science would be if it
worked that
way.
In
science, you start from the bottom and
work your
way up.
Science has mountains of evidence and mountains of proof pointing to the
way things began and the
way things have evolved and the
way things
work.
And yet the flight to physics rather gives the game away, since measured any
way you like — volume of papers, number of
working researchers, total amount of funding — deductive, theory - building physics in the mold of Newton and Lagrange, Maxwell and Einstein, is a tiny fraction of modern
science as a whole.
Science isn't a religion, it's a reliable
way of discovering how the universe
works.
We might note the obvious influence of Leo Strauss's Natural Right and History upon Bénéton's framing of modernity, but he
works out the implications of historicist relativism and Weberian social
science in
ways that are more attuned to both the contemporary academy and to our day - to - day lives.
Only a complete revision of how we approach educating both children and, yes, even adults in the
way the world
works, according to
science and NOT supersti - tion, is going to give us the hope we so desperately seek in ensuring that the U.S. survives and thrives far into this millennium.
It would be like having your
science teacher explain in detail what we have discovered in regards to evolution and been able to test and repeat but then ends with «Even though this is what we have observed time and again and has been peer reviewed and see no reason it should
work in any other
way, we just don't know how
science worked 10,000 years ago.
Science PROVED it does not
work the
way the bible said it did!!!
Theology, my opinion is that it is the same as
science, merely an observation of creation, worded into a
way that fits in to the confines of our minds, Our minds
work on logic via calculation and when God
works outside of that it is seen as a miracle.
As a christian and one who has lived in the world of
science all my
working life the answer is that God was the orgin of life that started in a
way that is still largly unknown to both the religious and scientific communities.
Science has theories about the
way the world
works which are not necessarily true, yes, but those theories must hold up to observable fact and testing.
The late Willis Harmon, former President of the Institute of Noetic
Science and a founder of the World Business Academy, a network of business people who believe that business has a positive role to play in reshaping the world, put it this
way: there is «a growing awareness that the present global system doesn't
work.
Perhaps the best argument against a super-intelligent agent creating the universe is that moderately - intelligent
science fiction writers often dream up universes that are
way cooler and often even «
work» better than the reality we all experience.
But the problem is they start with a conclusion and look for
ways to prove it, as opposed to the opposite, which is how
science works.»
Atheists claim that «Atheism is trying to explain the
way the universe
works using
science and reason» or «Atheism is about proving that religion gets humanity no where».
Supersti - tion no longer deserves the reverence it once was accustomed to receiving;
science has come quite a long
way in discovering how the world
works.
Yes, religion has done some good along the
way, and some of the earlier scientists were religious and even church - funded, but
science has since been able to explain much of how the world
works.
Many others are what she calls «spiritual entrepreneurs,» seeking creative
ways to
work with the tensions between
science and faith outside the constraints of traditional religion.....