Sentences with phrase «way worse men»

Both schools pull in more athletic revenue than the majority of front - line Big 12 candidates, but they have way worse men's basketball programs, smaller fanbases, less academic funding, and lower university rankings than the league's averages.

Not exact matches

David Tennant was believable as a man with the charm to get his way even without his powers of compulsion, and that made it all the worse that he'd violate everybody around him because it was easier.
The changing «ways» in the Bible (written by man) also can't seem to explain why incest is bad (not that I condone it), yet, how do you think Adam and Eve procreated after them?
Twain was a bad man, yes, in some ways, but he was the same mixture of good and bad as the rest of us, and every other artist and writer who ever lived, including the saintly ones.
im so sori this had to happend to eddy yet he is only human and only a man and it has nothing to do do with god and gods word im sori he has to be the example to the world that this is not the way but this is the life he has chosen if it is true he should have known wat happends in the dark will come in the light his bad yet god is a forgiven god just cuz you sit in church do nt make you saved just like sitting in the garage do nt make you a car.... - smile
Okay, I'm an atheist but I have to say that making a movie where an atheist has an affair with a Christian man's wife is a really bad way to try and have an atheist hero become accepted in the broader public.
igaftr isn't wrong and you're a sad person if you think people are born bad... what a pathetic way to look at your fellow man.
God has allowed over 6,000 years to pass since the first man's creation, but also has an «appointed time» to remove all bad conditions in the near future and make way for a paradise earth for «meek» ones.
Bad and divided as the church may be, it is the only organization really working at the job of affecting men's lives in the deep way in which they must be affected if what we prize is to survive.
But to say this is to justify, in a most fearful way, all that is worst in man's fallen condition.
Be very mindful how you pin a name on your brother sister; remember the church is there the burden and those who have sinned yet we become so eager to judge; the word has already judged him, God at this very moment is dealing with him in ways that no man can as we judge him, we have judged ourself, we can easily forgive when his sin is like ours, but when it is not; they killed CHRIST CAUSE HE SAID HE COULD RISE THE TEMPLE IN THREE DAYS; to the people of that day and time it was a lie; as we forgive him we are forgive ourselves for believing in man and not the word; the word is still true, and God can still use him; but we must believe and fellow the word God no matter what; God has a way of making something good out of what is bad; that where the hope comes in; the faith in blessed redemption; heal our nation lord; heal our minds love forgive all;
Nor should it be thought that good and bad men would be treated in the same way, giving them similar life and death (Surah XLV, 21).
But in this way does he accomplish nothing at all, since he is weighed down with men's opposition, and then gets the worst of the battle?
And Message of God is not different or Bad in Holy Quran also... problem is the way it has ben projected my MAN itself is sick and self destructive.
I have a bad feeling his comments are going to limit his political career but I admire the man for having the courage to say what needs to be said in the way that it needs to be said.
Jeremy have been asking the holy spirit for his help with this and in regards to the lame man that Jesus healed I do nt believe that sin was the issue for him just like the blind man was it his parents or did he sin the answer was neither but so that God would be glorified.What was the sin that may have been worse for him.The two situations are related of the woman caught in adultery the key words being go and sin no more only two references in the bible and will explain later the lame man we see at first his dependency on everyone else for his needs he cant do it he is in the best position to receive Gods grace but what does he do with it.Does he follow Jesus no we are told he goes to the temple and Jesus finds him now that he has his strength to do things on his own what his response to follow the way of the pharisees that is what is worse than his condition before so he is warned by go and sin no more.We get confused because we see the word sin but the giver of is speaking to him to go another way means death.Getting back to the two situations of the woman caught in adultery and the lame man here we see a picture of our hearts on the one our love for sin and on the other the desire to work out our salvation on our terms they are the two areas we have to submit to God.My experience was the self righteousness was the harder to deal with because it is linked in to our feelings of self worth and self confidence so we have to be broken so we are humble enough to realise that without God we can do nothing our flesh hates that so it is a struggle at first to change our way of thinking.brentnz
Unfortunately, man (me included) does not understand the purity of God and the awfulness of sin with the tendency to excuse sin in various ways, mostly by excusing what seems to them as not being «so bad».
Nevertheless, looked at the opposite way, at his actual nature, while similarly in the light of Christ, man is undeniably bad.
men have no right to say anything one way or the other due to the fact if you want the child so bad, you carry it.
Man, too bad you didn't post this a couple weeks ago, as I made another gingerbread cookie recipe from Martha's site and it was kinda lame... way too bready, not very sweet and frankly not very enjoyable.
Oh man too bad I'm not in Vancouver but all the way in MA for school.
And all he kept saying is that it's really not so bad and there must be a way I can salvage it (Men.
I can nitpick on each of our 14 players performance in this game if i want, but I happen to think that overall, obtaining a draw against a title contender playing away, especially playing with 10 men for almost 45 minutes, was not such a bad result after all, not only if the standard is applied to a fragile team such as AFC, but also if it were to be applied to some other «fantastic» team such as for example, Leicester... I can imagine that if we were to loose the game the way Leicester did at the Emirates, many (visitors to this site) would be condemning our players bottlers, chokers instead of hailing them for defending bravely for 20 minutes with 10 men... LOL..
And to make it worse Wenger is one stubborn old man who is stuck in his old ways and is ready to go down in an attempt to prove the world wrong.
Can't expect nor wait for a dip of Man City, they are an engine running and nothing can change this, Gardiola took a minute but it's on and he is focused on going all the way, distance teams each week as he does... He doesn't wait for a bad result or dip of other teams but focused on winning and performing well each game.
Nice article seetsuma... I quite agree with you — arsenal's transfer window is looking good thus far... however I know wenger is not done yet... He wants the league title once more & he knows how to get it... he maintained 4th position with the worst team we've had for a while - now improvement is beginning to crawl its way back yet arsenal fans on here won't just support this man... Pathetic!
Khabib is a poor man's GSP, with way worse standup.
Cazorla — too bad he was lost too soon... not blinded enough to think he would solve all of our ills but he was and is the only deep - lying player on this team that can pass more than 12 yards on a consistent basis... like Rosicky, gone way too soon but can't dwell on it too long or we end up in the crazy world of Wenger's man love for the one and only Diaby... don't resign because even if he were to come back he's been out to long and he just gives Wenger an excuse to not replace with talent
So there are 2 ways to look at it: 1) Our loss to Man U was due to a bad day, mostly from our defenders, and next time it will automatically get better.....
Arrogant fool has lost most of the fans with obvious bad tactics, excuses and lack of activity spending fans money (should never be as split as it is now AKB / AOB) the fans is what makes Arsenal, who i may add pay all the big bucks to watch The Arsenal in a fancy stadium that they paid for and what did they get in return... an old delusional stubborn man who runs their club the way he thinks its should be... 200m in the bank and nobody available??
A few goals here, a few there, and suddenly Chelsea2 have a few more points in the league, another away goal in Europe, and José Mourinho isn't sneering and flailing his way through press conferences like a man doing a bad impression of José Mourinho.
It's a dog - bites - man story in the worst way.
Seriously, the only way we'll beat Man City tomorrow is by them playing worse than US!..
They have a shelf life of 8/10 years at the very top if they are lucky so who can begrudge them the opportunity to make hay whilst the sun is shining... am not saying Sanchez is not money driven but the way the guy plays i can mortgage my life he actually enjoys the game, enjoys wining first and foremost then money comes 2nd... like the author of the article rightly pointed out, he was in Messi's shadow at Barca and could not express himself fully, now he is at a club where he is the main man and given a free role and license to express himself and i very much doubt if he will want to go to a club like Madrid (as been rumoured in the dailies today) to relieve the bad experience he suffered at Barca because let us face facts, he is never going to displace CR7 as the main man, so even if Madrid sells Benzema or Bale to make room for him he will be back to the same position he was at Barca, this time he will be playing 2nd fiddle to CR7 so my guess is all the Madrid talks is been fed the press by his agents to drive a hard bargain when contract extension talks resumes.....
So that makes up in some way for Arsenal having the bad luck to get a Premier League team while the likes of Liverpool, Man United and Chelsea get Exeter, Sheffield United and Scunthorpe.
the obvious fact is that the club began to stagnate in football terms a decade ago after the CL semi against man utd and has been in outright retreat over the last 3 years... some fans were calling for wenger to leave in 2011 - 12 as it was clear he could not cope with a more competitive environment others have been more tolerant, hanging on to fa cup glory and hoping that he would somehow self correct his weak and erratic management style but most now realise that is not possible and that the club will deteriorate further under his management so also want him gone, that has left a hard core of wenger loyalists who are either fixated with the past (selecting episodic good and bad times to justify wengers decade long failure) or too frightened of the future to contemplate a change (with selective reference to failed managerial changes by way of justification) or both, to conclude, through a mixture of panglossian fatalism and corporate philosophising, how lucky we are to have such an honourable and educated man in charge... along with their confused references to club loyalty and addiction to computer games these are troubled souls who need our sympathy and concerned medical advice... SO JUST F OFF STOCK UP ON CANNED SOUP AND GO SUPPORT ASTON VILLA ON FIFA!
I wanted wenger gone z5 years ago when it was clear he would not deliver but surely there is no doubting He has demolished this team over last 3 years... no passion no style and obvious lack of quality... There is simply no way a serious club can keep a man like this at the top... Chances are this will spell melt down in league to... But whatever happens it will be a worse season than last... I for one will not be sad to see the back of him
Top 50 Premier League players in 2014/15, with Arsenal & Chelsea stars ranking high Top 30 worst Premier League players of the 2014/15 season: Man United & Liverpool flops lead the way
I watched Man u v Seville last week, and Man U played exceptionally bad except De Ga... And the commentary seem to have forgot to pick this up... All the way during the game, no mention that Man U have not had a shot on goal... (No get my facts right) They had one shot on goal for 90 mins..
Arsenal have had plenty of bad luck, but to find ourselves just off the top four and ahead of our big rivals Liverpool and Man United and just three points behind Man City after the way we have started the reason is a huge bonus.
not bad players just average ones and slightly above average in girouds case... but because they have spearheaded attack for nigh on 5 years is one reason why arsenal have underperformed... we needed two quality attackers this window and adding one ai nt going to swing it our way but sadly seems like the yoghurt man has past his sell by date but still deluding himself that he has a first X!
We may have been raped in the SF, You all forget what was, said since last season, everyone agreed the midfield was poor, and the summer didn't help and we braced our selves for the worst, now we have made history perhaps with poor football but the problems never left, some people say «we lost to fucking Roma» I doubt you all understand what it means to have the players you need and want, eusebio di Francesco has what is needed to play HIS football, lucho signed poor midfielders BUT they were required for his FOOTBALL not in any way the Barca way (he played attacking and entertaining but it's sad to see no one wanted to acknowledge that those signings weren't right, He got figured out and left like a man with BALLS Valverde restored positional play and brought emphasis to the midfield but he lacks the MF to do it.
Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste
They took a man grabbing his clothed crotch, and by blurring it implied he did something way worse.
The way they missed all these chances was just bad, don't tell me stoke goalie was doing great the way I saw it the shots on him were really soft and weak, and the chance that giroud missed in the 75th min just proves that he's not good enough to lead a top level football club offences, I've always supported giroud before but now enough is enough, I still support him though because it's not his fault for being our first man it's wenger's fault, who proved to be the most deluded man I've ever seen
The man is and always will be an Arsenal legend, while Jose Maureen moaning Mourinho is a nasty, spiteful, dishonest piece of work who deserves all the bad things that are hopefully headed his way.
The worst thing about the draw, in my opinion, is the fact that we have to play away but here come the positives: First of all the Gunners seem to be playing well and hitting form and after the way we played away to beat Man City recently we should have no real fear.
As usual Jon you make some good points but with all respect to Leeds, Villa and Forest, no way would Spurs spend the amount of time in the lower leagues [just one year] that those three have spent recently and I'm sure you remember that great Spurs side in their double year dropping their first point after 14 games to Man City and suffering their first defeat to Sheffield Wednesday by the odd goal in three on Boxing day and almost beating our 66 point record [2 points a win in those days] which stood from the glorious thirties thanks to a shock home defeat on the last day of the season by West Brom with their frightening forward line of Jones, White, Smith, Allen, and Dyson and to make things worse the following year the signing of Jimmy Greaves, and don't let anybody tell different without doubt the greatest striker the English game as ever seen.
Personally I think its bad news, what better way for the players to send off the man they love and hold in high esteem than to make sure he leaves the club on a high?..
Everything you have said is true, but I still think it's a bad decision and, the way Arsene's luck goes, will almost certainly be followed by a long term injury to one of our wide men in the next game or two.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z