Below are three easy and cost - effective
ways policymakers and public institutions can reduce their HFC emissions and lead by example to strengthen policy linkages between climate and health:
Not exact matches
At Britain in 2014 we're opening up social science research to
policymakers and the
public, encouraging challenge
and debate
and building a two -
way flow of questions
and knowledge.»
Building cities in a
way that slows vehicle demand while delivering high accessibility could prove to be a low - cost option for curbing greenhouse gas emissions, as well as a solution to pressing problems for
policymakers like local air pollution
and poor
public health.
Although one might be able to secure short - term gains this
way, misleading the
public and policymakers almost always backfires.
Nevertheless, they wrote, «The asteroid - threat community has been much more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the dominant worst - case scenarios
and communicating them to
policymakers, the media
and the
public — even though the climate change threat is more than a thousand times greater..., [therefore] quantitative comparison of climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable
way to put both threats into perspective.»
May it serve as a warning not only to
policymakers, but also to researchers, clinicians, peer reviewers, journal editors,
and journalists of the need to consider the harm to scientific credibility
and public health when dealing with studies funded by food companies with vested interests in the results —
and to find better
ways to fund such studies
and to prevent, disclose
and manage potentially conflicted interests,» writes Marion Nestle, Ph.D., M.P.H., of New York University, in a related commentary.
To that end, Smarick encourages private school leaders to think about three key areas of opportunity: building a school network structure, encouraging incubation of high - potential schools,
and considering an authorizer model as a
way to quell concerns over accountability to the
public and policymakers.
Collaborative is an award - winning expert in rethinking
and redesigning how student data are presented in
ways that are accessible, appealing,
and actionable for students, educators, parents,
policymakers,
and the
public at large.
• The RSD, conceived originally as a modest pilot program that had awarded turnaround charters for just four schools prior to Hurricane Katrina, was dramatically enlarged by Louisiana
policymakers as a
way to get
public schools open after the ensuing floods,
and was propelled by more than $ 20 million in federal charter school funding.
Policymakers and the
public must immediately engage in an open
and transparent community decision - making process about the best
ways to use test scores
and to develop accountability systems that fully support a broader, more accurate definition of college, career,
and citizenship readiness that ensures equity
and access for all students.
It does so in three
ways: providing timely, useful information to
policymakers; advancing awareness among the larger
public on complex education issues;
and highlighting effective models
and strategies intended to improve student outcomes.
In order to improve rural schools, authors recommend federal
policymakers stop promoting private school vouchers as a
way to expand educational opportunities in rural areas,
and to instead boost educational opportunities in local
public schools by increasing efforts to modernize rural classrooms
and integrate technology into teaching
and learning.
Self - policing is the surest
way to reassure outsiders
and reduce the urge for
policymakers to intrude on practice — especially when
public funds
and purposes are at stake.
This sort of backward thinking echo back to the days before the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001, when education
policymakers and practitioners preferred to ignore the racialist policies that often made American
public education a
way - station to poverty
and prison for poor
and minority children.
At the same time, there was growing interest in teacher quality among
policymakers, philanthropists
and education reformers looking for
ways to improve on a
public education system that was reportedly failing to produce students who could compete globally.
«Rather than try to impose a one - size - fits - all mandate on these
public schools of choice,
policymakers should be finding
ways to help charters flourish
and increase choices for parents as part of a comprehensive approach to giving every child a great
public school,» Grace said.
At a time of change for
public education, please help keep EdSource's voice strong as we develop new
ways to engage
policymakers and the
public.
Despite overwhelming evidence that the tests are invalid
ways to measure teaching
and learning —
and continuing signs of their unjust effects on students
and teachers — «reformers»
and policymakers continue to force high - stakes tests into the
public schools.
This has transformed the
way that
policymakers think about age at which
public education should begin — it used to be first grade, then kinder half day, then full day
and now preschool at age 4 or even 3.
Although decent responses exist for every one of these concerns, as do sundry
ways of curbing their excesses, it's probably time for education reformers
and policymakers to admit that just pushing harder on test - driven accountability as the primary tool for changing our creaky old
public - school system is apt to yield more backlash than accomplishment.
The second is to find
ways of effectively communicating this information in an understandable
and usable
way to
policymakers and the
public.
Framing carbon removal as a «third
way» risks even further «neglect [of carbon removal] in political negotiations
and public debate,» (as you write in the article) as
policymakers might see carbon removal as a distraction to prolong business - as - usual production of GHG emissions, which it clearly is not.
Policymakers and the
public need a mechanism for making a series of difficult
and interrelated choices over time,
and research in decision science offers a promising
way forward.
With every assessment the group publishes four technical reports, each thousands of pages long — one on the basic science,
and others on climate impacts
and how to adapt to them,
ways to curb emissions,
and a synthesis of all the findings — as well as a 20 - page summary for
policymakers that covers the material most relevant to world leaders
and the
public.
Geoengineering, in other words, can be viewed by civil society organizations as a strategic opening, as a
way to bring home the horrors of climate change to
policymakers and the
public.
With that long introduction out of the
way, what do these 6 charts tell the
policymakers, the taxpayers
and the general
public?
Part of the challenge in creating the incentives for
policymakers to take action on climate change
and to address the issue in a serious
way is to accurately communicate about the nature of
public opinion.
Regarding Nisbet
and getting around skeptics, his closing line is «Part of the challenge in creating the incentives for
policymakers to take action on climate change
and to address the issue in a serious
way is to accurately communicate about the nature of
public opinion.»
Even just acknowledging more openly the incredible magnitude of the deep structural uncertainties that are involved in climate - change analysis —
and explaining better to
policymakers that the artificial crispness conveyed by conventional IAM - based CBAs [Integrated Assessment Model — Cost Benefit Analyses] here is especially
and unusually misleading compared with more ordinary non-climate-change CBA situations — might go a long
way toward elevating the level of
public discourse concerning what to do about global warming.
I am optimistic by nature,
and I believe that although the SRL Phenomenon faces us with a dizzying array of challenges — whether as lawyers, judges,
policymakers, court staff or a member of the
public — we can
and shall find
ways for the justice system can develop a realistic contemporary approach to what we used to call access to justice.
The extent to which Text
and Data Mining is revolutionising the
way both
public and private sector researchers work has yet to be fully realised by EU
policymakers, argue data mining experts.
Childhood Begins at Home is a statewide campaign designed to help
policymakers and the
public understand the value of evidence - based home visiting
and effective
ways to support parents.
These programs may educate the general
public, service providers,
and policymakers about the scope
and problems associated with child maltreatment, the factors that lead to maltreatment,
and ways to prevent it.