Not exact matches
I know that we've discussed this issue at length in the past, so if you've commented on the topic before, consider
presenting what you think to
be both the strongest AND THE
WEAKEST elements of your own
argument... in the spirit of the fast.
The
weakest arguments should
be discussed and
presented in the closing paragraphs of the essay body.
Lee has an opinion, you might not agree or like it, but it
's hard to argue its unethical per se if it neglects to
present all sides or deconstructs counter
arguments, it could simply
be viewed as
weaker by some.
Carvin
is correct, however, that his best chance of winning this case
is to hope that the justices will place their partisan preferences before the law, as the legal
arguments presented in his briefs
are weak.