We might note that these are, at best,
weak arguments since 16 year olds can only marry and join the army with their parents» permission and even 5 year olds pay tax in the form of VAT when their pocket money is translated into sweets.
First the «born in sin» I would suggest is
a weak argument since we are talking about the unborn and also would be offensive to parents of children that died prior to birth (me being one of them).
Not exact matches
This is a
weak argument, but interestingly,
since I wrote the article, is seems that nearly every book I read has ideas which parallel the content of my research.
Seriously... your
arguments are some of the
weakest I have encountered
since I left the VERY BLIND fundamentalist church.
In other words, that
argument is been dragged out for centuries and has been beaten down for its
weak position
since Pascal first suggested it.
Every time you do it, you show what a
weak argument you have,
since it shows the incorrect way you think.
And I don't necessarily disagree, I'm just saying that @jc's point would be more arguable, perhaps, as a
weak analogy fallacy rather that the ad hominem s / he chose,
since the crux of the
argument is the comparison, not the person making the
argument.
Of course Mass may feel that a linear regression of average Texas summer temperatures
since 1895 provides conclusive evidence for his case that AGW is currently far too
weak to play a significant role in the Texas 2011 heatwave (an
argument he recycles in his Aug 9 blog post), but it is strange Mass picks on Rupp et al 2012 without mentioning Massey et al 2012 in the same collection of papers that similarly finds AGW impacts in excess of Mass's method (3 times in excess by my calculation).
Was the director concerned that the results would undermine the already extremely
weak arguments that global warming from roughly the middle of the 1970s to near the end of the 1990s (there has been none
since) was almost entirely the result of human - caused processes?
[Sea levels] are [rising]
since we got out of the last ice age 20.000 years ago when the sea is 130 m below the current level This is a very
weak argument.
I suppose you could make a charter
argument out of it but I think it would be a pretty
weak one
since being mayor hardly qualifies as a «right».