Sentences with phrase «weak effect of warming»

«The things acting to reduce malaria spread, like improved healthcare and disease control, are much more powerful than the weak effect of warming,» Gething says.

Not exact matches

Schlesinger and Ramankutty reach broadly similar conclusions, but they also point out that even though greenhouse gases now dominate global warming, if part of the warming during this century is indeed due to solar changes, the additional greenhouse effect may be weaker than was previously thought (Nature, vol 360, p 330).

But then how to explain a similar rapid warming that occurred during the early 20th century, when the effects of greenhouse gases were considerably weaker than today?

«Such a slowdown is consistent with the projected effects of anthropogenic climate change, where warming and freshening of the surface ocean from melting ice caps leads to weaker overturning circulation,» DeVries explained.

This may help explain some of the changes that are not explained by the orbital curves in the other thread, especially the initiation of warming and cooling since the GCR effects can be much more powerful (partly forcing as postulated in the paper, but also amplification of the weaker orbital forcing).

It also helps explain the initial cooling after the Industrial Revolution began (the smoke effect overwhelmed the relatively weak warming effect back then), the increase of global temperture during WW2 (shut down of industries) and decrease after WW2 (re-industrialization) and acceleration in the 1970's after the passage of the Clean Air Act.

«Compared to the Arctic, global warming causes only weak Antarctic sea ice loss, which is why the IPO can have such a striking effect in the Antarctic,» explained study's co-author Cecilia Bitz from University of Washington in a statement.

When it is politically convenient to do so, ENSO is claimed to be an effect of «global warming» — i.e. that «global warming» causes more and larger El Nino and fewer and weaker La Nina episodes.

I agree with Mike [Mann] that the weak steering currents over the south - central US coincident with Harvey are consistent with our expectations for a warmer world, which of course includes effects of a very warm Arctic.»

«I agree with Mike [Mann] that the weak steering currents over the south - central US coincident with Harvey are consistent with our expectations for a warmer world, which of course includes effects of a very warm Arctic,» Jennifer Francis, a climate scientist at Rutgers University, told ThinkProgress.

Of course even a weak effect may be measurable with high precision laboratory equipment, but is it something that you would accept as a full proof of the GH warminOf course even a weak effect may be measurable with high precision laboratory equipment, but is it something that you would accept as a full proof of the GH warminof the GH warming?

(This is also the reason, why the warming of real greenhouses is based essentially on stopping convection rather than on the radiative greenhouse effect, which is in them too weak to observe.)

The net effect of these processes taken together is a sustained growth of the carbon storage in the Southern Ocean, notwithstanding a weaker global ocean carbon uptake predicted by all models in a warming climate.

Some of the late 20th century warming is therefore from a solar heat lag from the increase in solar output from 1750 - 1950 +, meaning C02 effect is even weaker than in your paper above.

There is an effect of a Stratospheric feed - back in winter whereby weaker UV levels during low solar cause less warming of the Strat in low latitudes and thereby weaken the Strat deltaT, and giving a nudge to displacement / disruption of the PV.

Most of the warming in climate models is not from CO2 directly but from feedback effects, and the evidence for strong positive climate feedback on temperature is very weak (to the point of non-existence) as compared to the evidence of greenhouse gas warming (yes, individual effects like ice cover melting are undeniably positive feedback effects, the question is as to the net impact of all such effects).

Knowledge of Global Warming Causes & Effects Weak At Best Though 87 % of Americans have heard of the greenhouse effect, only 57 % of people know that it refers to gases in the atmosphere trapping heat, with 13 % never having heard the term; 50 % of people know that global warming is mostly caused by human activity; 45 % of people understanding that CO2 traps heat; just 25 % of people have even heard the terms coral bleaching or ocean acidifiWarming Causes & Effects Weak At Best Though 87 % of Americans have heard of the greenhouse effect, only 57 % of people know that it refers to gases in the atmosphere trapping heat, with 13 % never having heard the term; 50 % of people know that global warming is mostly caused by human activity; 45 % of people understanding that CO2 traps heat; just 25 % of people have even heard the terms coral bleaching or ocean acidifiwarming is mostly caused by human activity; 45 % of people understanding that CO2 traps heat; just 25 % of people have even heard the terms coral bleaching or ocean acidification.

While the upper - troposphere tropical warming induces a poleward shift of the jet in winter, Arctic Amplification and a weaker stratospheric polar vortex result in the opposite effect.

This may help explain some of the changes that are not explained by the orbital curves in the other thread, especially the initiation of warming and cooling since the GCR effects can be much more powerful (partly forcing as postulated in the paper, but also amplification of the weaker orbital forcing).