Not exact matches
In a profession that already feels under siege, the decision in most states — encouraged by the U.S. Department of Education — to press ahead with using student test scores as a significant component of a
teacher's
evaluation «just fuels the perception that we care more about weeding out
weak teachers than giving the vast majority of
teachers the time and support they need to make a successful transition to Common Core,» says Schwartz.
Just 36 percent of them, according to Public Agenda, believe that their tougher scrutiny of
weak teachers is leading to tenure denials and only 30 percent report that student achievement is being factored into their
teacher evaluations.
Using data captured by that state's intensive
teacher evaluation protocol, researchers identified
teachers who were
weak in one (or more) of a constellation of assessed characteristics, and then matched them with
teachers who were strong in corresponding areas.
At those good schools, she said, the state
teacher evaluation system could actually get in the way of getting rid of
weak teachers.
And, increasingly, we're getting solid evidence of what reforms may help:
teacher evaluations based on student performance, higher pay and prestige for good
teachers, dismissals for
weak teachers.
As a result, principals may be less inclined to dismiss their
weak teachers or even to risk offending them with low
evaluation scores.
Sure, Supt. John Deasy has managed to at least talk the talk on systemically reforming the district (even as he makes rather
weak moves as striking a deal with the AFT's City of Angels local on a
teacher evaluation plan that does little to actually measure the performance of
teachers based on their success with the students they instruct in classrooms) and has even allowed for families at 24th Street Elementary to exercise the district's own Parent Trigger policy and take over the school.
But now, as part of an agreement reached Thursday, the Education Department and the United Federation of
Teachers will put into effect an evaluation system that will bring independent observers into the city's classrooms to monitor the weakest t
Teachers will put into effect an
evaluation system that will bring independent observers into the city's classrooms to monitor the
weakest teachersteachers.
Effective, rigorous
teacher -
evaluation systems provide substantive, tailored feedback to individual
teachers that could be coupled with targeted professional development in
teachers»
weakest areas in order to improve
teachers» practice and, by extension, student achievement.
Evaluation of Effectiveness: Supporting Research Reports strongly suggest that most current
teacher evaluations are largely a meaningless process, failing to identify the strongest and
weakest teachers.
Washington's new
teacher evaluation law may be too
weak to satisfy the federal government.
Although the use of some of these successful models has spread, the broad landscape for
teacher evaluation has changed little, and impatience with the results of
weak systems has grown.
Litigation over value - added
teacher evaluations is being conducted in 14 states, and the legal battleground is shifting to the place where corporate reformers are
weakest.
Bridge's Measurement and
Evaluation team work closely with government bodies to understand which
teacher training and support techniques are most effective, and which
teacher demographics may indicate a stronger or
weaker efficacy in the classroom.
But to suggest that because these observational indicators (artificially) correlate with
teachers» value - added scores at «
weak» and «very
weak» levels (see Notes 1 and 2 below), that this means that these observational systems might «add» more «value» to the summative sides of
teacher evaluations (i.e., their predictive value) is premature, not to mention a bit absurd.
Good principals are important to the
teacher evaluation process, dismissing
weak teachers and replacing them with strong
teachers.