It was what Pissarra refers to as a Darwinist phase of business development — when natural selection sorts
weak companies from strong.
One of the main reasons for the under performance is that the criteria are quite broad and include
many weaker companies that have cut their dividends after being included in the index, and have seen weak performance as a result.
Oil prices have bounced around the $ 60 per barrel mark, low enough to cause deeper financial stress
for weaker companies.
Under IFRS, temporary resuscitation of
weak companies through timely acquisitions has become like child's play.
Fundamentally weak companies typically face increased pressures on their financials in a rising interest - rate environment, allowing managers to potentially benefit when they can correctly pick winners while hedging out general market risks through short positions.
Ideally the company should have a strong competitive position in a stable industry, or should at least be one of the stronger companies in a cyclical industry that can ride out slumps
when weaker companies falter.
Weaker companies talk about how they will make it, and that their banks are on board, committing credit, waiving covenants, etc..
For example, U.S. federal government bonds are generally the highest quality, while some types of corporate bonds issued
by weaker companies are often referred to as «junk bonds» because of their high risks.
Running asset policies that were, in hindsight, very aggressive, they came into a period from 2000 to 2002 that would qualify as the perfect storm: large underwriting losses, losses in the equity and corporate bond markets and rating agencies on the warpath, downgrading
newly weak companies at a time when higher ratings would have helped cash flow.
Although lists like Dividend Aristocrats can sometimes suffer from Survivor Bias, as
many weaker companies could have been dumped from the list along the way, I like the concept because dividends are real money in our pocket.
The Piotroski F - Score has a proven record of increasing the probability of
eliminating weak companies and identifying the stocks of companies with good fundamentals.
Many of
the weaker companies have been eliminated through a 10 - year war with recession.
As stronger railroads bought up
weaker companies and divided up markets with the remaining competitors, the dangers of monopoly became more and more apparent.
«Time Warner is
a weaker company today than it was three years ago because Jeff Bewkes has run it to maximize its sale price for the past few years.
Workers may not want to go to
the weaker company.
One potential leading indicator is
the weakest company in an industry.
Theoretically, then there will be greater price dispersion between the stocks of
weaker companies and those that are fundamentally stronger when interest rates trend higher.
This could potentially separate
the weaker companies and sectors from the strong.
The devil in the details: how do you prevent normal business activity (eg: buying Christmas inventory) from taking the value of
a weak company below the value of unfunded pension obligations?
«I tend to avoid the shares of
weaker companies, even if their shares are selling at depressed prices.
The Piotroski F - Score Stock Screen is a value investing strategy to identify stocks of companies with good fundamentals and eliminate stocks of
weak companies.
Second, many of the businesses that went into receivership over the holidays were
weak companies.
In a bear market,
the weakest companies with the flimsiest business models the ones to get hit the hardest.
Because strong companies tend to survive and
weak companies are often acquired at a discount or go out of business, a database that includes only the survivors will likely yield much stronger results for a backtest than if «non-survivors» were included.
The Piotroski F - Score Test is a value investment analysis tool to identify stocks of companies with good fundamentals and eliminate stocks of
weak companies.
It is rarely a good idea to buy the stock of
a weak company in a competitive industry, regardless of the valuation.
When it hits,
weak companies and their investors will be washed away.
The Piotroski F - Score Stock Screen is a value investing strategy to identify stocks of companies with good fundamentals and eliminate stocks of
weak companies.
Again, I'd adjust my valuation accordingly... this will rightly distinguish the valuation of strong companies from
weak companies (and I penalise weak companies accordingly — see Aryzta, for example).
During the intermediate phase between bull and bear,
the weakest companies fail from unrecognized systemic risk.
Chatham House says a period of adjustment is expected in the transition to a low - carbon economy in which financially strong companies acquire strong assets currently belonging to
weaker companies.
«In that scenario we would not be surprised to see some increase in deals being done on
the weaker companies being financed.»