Crude demand sure to fall with low industry growth, people getting poorer (as a result of concentration of
wealth in few hands) and increasing CNG and electric powered cars.
NGOs became «convinced that large - scale, top - down development concentrates
wealth in fewer hands, transfers power to TNC's -LCB- transnational corporations], destroys traditional communities rather than developing them, disempowers the poor, and degrades the environment.»
They concentrate
wealth in a few hands, and stomp everyone else into the ground.]-RRB-.
Not exact matches
In this unfortunate tipping point, the concentration of wealth in the hands of the few results in economic implosion because the 99 percent can't afford to buy anything the 1 percent has to sel
In this unfortunate tipping point, the concentration of
wealth in the hands of the few results in economic implosion because the 99 percent can't afford to buy anything the 1 percent has to sel
in the
hands of the
few results
in economic implosion because the 99 percent can't afford to buy anything the 1 percent has to sel
in economic implosion because the 99 percent can't afford to buy anything the 1 percent has to sell.
But over the last
few years (since 2008), I think there's been a pretty dramatic growth
in what we'd call Tea Party politics
in that set — extreme conservatism that goes beyond
hands off fiscal and regulatory policy, the kind of feverish mindset
in which you could write with a straight face that progressives might be building toward some sort of mass
wealth confiscation or internment or even extermination for the likes of Tom Perkins.
We, on the other
hand, view it with hope: because more than anything, the events of the past
few days show that the truth is getting out — the truth that capital markets simply can not exist under the authoritarian rule of central planners, the truth that the stock market is a casino
in which the best one can hope for a quick flip, and finally the truth that our entire socio - economic regime, whose existence has been predicated by borrowing from the uncreated
wealth of the future, and where accumulated debt could be wiped out at the flip of a switch if things go wrong
in the process obliterating the welfare of billions (of less than 1 % ers), is one big lie.
It outlines a number of areas for Christians to consider and advises people to vote for a party that is interested
in «reversing the accumulation of power and
wealth in fewer and
fewer hands, whether those of the state, corporations or individuals».
I was just reading the Sermon on the Mount: «Blessed are the conservatives who keep
wealth in the
hands of the
few... Blessed are those who want to move towards the way things were
in the good old days... Blessed are those who repeal programs for the poor and give to the rich.»
Nationally, we are concentrating
wealth in fewer and
fewer hands.
The market's tendency to concentrate
wealth in fewer and
fewer hands should be countered by redistributive policies.
The concentration of
wealth puts control of the not - really - free market
in the
hands of a relatively
few families.
It is the inevitable social byproduct of the concentration of
wealth in the
hands of a
few.
It contributes to the concentration of
wealth in fewer and
fewer hands.
Too much
wealth landed
in the
hands of too
few people.
But when
wealth is concentrated
in a
few hands, it gives these
hands the power to shape markets to their own advantage.
We can, however, appreciate the passion for justice to ordinary people and opposition to concentrating
wealth in the
hands of a
few.
The objection is that it transfers
wealth from the public to the banks and it concentrates
wealth and power
in fewer and
fewer hands.
It also concentrates power as well as
wealth in fewer and
fewer hands.
The prophets picked up on this ideal, protesting the concentration of
wealth and power
in a
few hands.
The world's
wealth is being concentrated
in fewer and
fewer hands, and those to whom we turn for advice
in these matters tell us it is none of their business.
Deforestation, war, rampant exploitation of resources, and the serve concentration of the worlds
wealth in the
hands of a
few corporations.
As we have noted, the current distributional pattern characterized by gross concentration of land
in the
hands of the
few is the basis for the concentration of both
wealth and political power.
Yet, on the other
hand, neither have Mr. McGurn and Wall Street offered, or allowed, pace Milton Friedman, any creative ways or thinking to address the glaring and cruel gap
in wealth between the
few and the many throughout the world.
You're buying into the lie, because there are and have been people
in power who want us to continue to decimate our economy and our nation, pouring all of our
wealth into the
hands of a
few weapons manufacturers and oil corporations.
Since the economic system also concentrates
wealth and power
in fewer and
fewer hands and excludes the majority from participation even
in its material benefits, it generates enormous suffering.
In addition to concentrating wealth and power in fewer and fewer hands, the present system is impoverishing the Eart
In addition to concentrating
wealth and power
in fewer and fewer hands, the present system is impoverishing the Eart
in fewer and
fewer hands, the present system is impoverishing the Earth.
They demand nothing short of upper class / caste domination
in our society to end and strive for a new order wherein the
wealth of nations is no longer concentrated
in the
hands of a
few, but wherein people actively participate
in the development and well - being of the nation.
The empirical and historical fact is that the market favors the rich over the poor and tends to concentrate
wealth in fewer and
fewer hands.
The war hastened the process of concentrating the
wealth of this country
in the
hands of the
few; it is a process which has been going on at accelerated pace ever since.
Is the rising power and capital accumulation of FAMGA (Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon) together with advances
in block chains and artificial intelligence leading to the concentration of
wealth in ever
fewer hands, obsolescence of manual labour and even the destruction of capitalism, as Karl Marx believed
in the 19th century?
A provocative 2013 book written by French economist Thomas Piketty, Capital
in the Twenty - first Century, condemns the politics of austerity and unbridled capitalism that concentrate
wealth in the
hands of a
few and create persistent inequalities.
According to her website, Teachout believes
in «economic and political equality» and is against «concentration of
wealth and control
in the
hands of the
few.»
«The evils of racism, the evils of poverty, the inexcusable reality that our educational system fails our children, the concentration of
wealth in the
hands of too
few, and the experience of deprivation
in the lives of too many,» he said, alluding to the outbursts of racial violence following the deaths of black men at the
hands of police
in Ferguson, Mo. and Baltimore.
Requiem for the American Dream Directed and written by Peter Hutchison, Kelly Nyks and Jared P. Scott (USA)-- World Premiere, Documentary Anchored by a series of interviews with Noam Chomsky, this definitive documentary of the «Two Americas» is an unvarnished account of how policies have helped concentrate
wealth in the
hands of a
few at expense of everyone else.
Anchored by a series of interviews with Noam Chomsky, this definitive documentary of the «Two Americas» is an unvarnished account of how policies have helped concentrate
wealth in the
hands of a
few at expense of everyone else.
Our conclusion is that the problem is not merely privatization of our public schools, it is concentration of
wealth and power
in the
hands of a
few billionaires.
Never mind staggering levels of unemployment
in the inner cities or a system
in which more and more of the nation's
wealth is concentrated
in fewer and
fewer hands; just place the blame on individuals whose characters are deficient.
Seven years later oil was discovered, transforming the impoverished country's economy, but most of the
wealth stayed
in the
hands of a
few, leading to resentment and unrest.
(and the gain is not tax free) The real cause of the increase
in debt - to - income ratio is the following; 1) High taxation leaving
fewer dollars
in the
hands of the public 2) Record low interest rates and relaxed lending criteria 3) The
wealth affect of increasing Real Estate prices 4) ridiculous credit card interest rates 5) lack of real wage growth
«The financial regime of the past century has not only led to a massive accumulation of capital
in a
few private
hands and created a powerful oligarchy that operates a policy of radical
wealth defense through formally democratic means.
The way the global economy is organized and managed,
wealth is consolidated
in the
hands of the
few fortunate winners.
Never
in human history has so much
wealth been concentrated
in the
hands of so
few people.
Never before has so much
wealth been concentrated
in the
hands of so
few people.
This path logically leads to further dwindling resources which will
in turn concentrate the country's natural resources and therefore much of its
wealth in the
hands of a
few.
A friend of mine is concerned that the existence today of excessive executive compensation is leading to the accumulation of disproportionate
wealth and economic and political power
in the
hands of a
few.
That's an incredible amount of
wealth in the
hands of very, very
few.