Not surprisingly, some of the greatest support for
wealthier societies doing more is found in relatively poor economies that are not major sources of emissions.
Not exact matches
Rather than hoarding their money or creating family dynasties as many of their predecessors
did, a growing number of
wealthy Americans are pledging their fortunes to benefit
society.
In the former, euergesia (to
do good) was a practice of the
wealthy, who contributed to the well - being of
society.
So, for these and other reasons, we
do not now often see our
society as one divided into
wealthy exploiting owners and poor exploited workers.
I am not calling for cuts to government programs as of now — they are necessary for so many people's basic survival — but Mr. Beck
does have a pertinent point: voting to tax someone else (typically
wealthier than us) to provide assistance
does not necessarily demonstrate a
society that «cares» — much more caring is a
society that willingly donates those funds to charities they have taken the time to research, and more caring still if the members of that
society take the time to volunteer to administer that aid.
However, for the
wealthy and millionaires, mingling with the common opposite sexes
do not come naturally because of their placement in the
society and the places they frequent.
That being said, they
do justice to Mr. Sorkin's fine writing and directing as the film examines this almost hidden part of
society that caters to the whims, addictions and games of extraordinarily
wealthy and successful men.
The
wealthy have used this time to purge
society of criminals and ne'er -
do - wells.
Moreover, like vouchers, online learning is theoretically egalitarian but could further stratify
society, as the
wealthy and educated exploit new technology before low - income and working - class students
do.
«We must recognize that different colleges provide different experiences for students, and, if we as a
society value equal opportunity as we say we
do, it's critical that Colorado's low - income students have the same access to elite colleges as their
wealthier peers,» said Van Schoales, CEO of A + Denver.
I worry that if we, as a
society, don't figure out how to make this happen, the diversity of points of view we find in the books and articles we read will slowly shrink, until we're left with a situation where we only have the points of view of people
wealthy enough not to need the money and people so over the top invested in sharing their ideas that they don't care about money at all.
This
does not sit well with the Payne's, who want to debut their own daughter, also named Katherine, into
society so she can marry a
wealthy husband.
You could dig up statistics on the
wealthy, chronicle those who are showy in our
society, and write a book about the glamour of the well - to -
do.
What we
do know is that the game follows a low - class protagonist named Charlie who lives in a
society that only the
wealthy can enjoy.
However, when presented with the opportunity to marry the
wealthy businessman Charles Nevelson and move to New York as a
society matron rather than alone as a poor student, she
did not hesitate to
do so.
You fight the natural disaster with the economy /
society you have, not the economy /
society you might want or wish to have (note: this
does not apply to the armies of
wealthy countries).
The move is inspired partly by studies of
wealthy societies that show when a country grows through a certain level of basic prosperity more money
does not make people more content.
What the sensible and practical middle ground of
society must
do is defuse the fear and frame a positive social narrative in favour of healthy and
wealthy human
societies and environmental conservation and restoration.
As more devices keep us connected 24/7 to an increasingly hectic world, as blinking cursors and back - lit screens invade the intimacy of our inner sanctums,
society would
do well to follow the wise words of Benjamin Franklin: «Early to bed and early to rise makes a man healthy,
wealthy and wise.»